$3,885.400
+21.758 (+0.56%)At close
Price Predictions
Open in app to unlock longer-horizon forecasts.
SEB Prediction & Forecast by Similar Chart Analysis
Alphio's SEB stock price prediction model matches the current Seaboard Corp tape against historical breakout patterns, then publishes 1-day and 1-week targets first. The 1-day print is $3879.57 (-0.15%). The 1-week path is $3889.29 (+0.10%). Longer windows use the same pattern set plus seasonality; the 1-month and multi-year forecasts sit behind unlock because they include precise min / avg / max bands.
Should I Buy Seaboard Corp Stock?
Seaboard Corp (SEB) is currently trading at $3885.40, with a forward P/E ratio of 11.93, which suggests it is relatively undervalued compared to its earnings potential. However, the RSI is at 46.72, indicating it is neither overbought nor oversold, which suggests caution. The stock has seen a year-to-date decline of 12.16%, but it has a strong one-year change of +17.03%, showing potential for recovery. The main risk is the declining gross margin, which is currently at 7.56%, down from previous quarters, indicating potential pressure on profitability.
SEB stock price ended at $3,885.40 on Friday, after rising +0.56%
Seaboard Corp (SEB) last closed at $3885.4, gaining +0.56%. These facts feed the 1-day and 1-week SEB price prediction above.
Forecast Drivers
Seaboard Corp (SEB) forecast drivers combine similar chart patterns, seasonality, and moving averages.
Similar patterns
Bullish
Seasonality
Bearish
SMA 20
Bearish
SMA 200
Bearish
Similar Chart Patterns
Stocks whose recent price path most closely matches SEB, ranked by similarity.
Seasonality analysis for SEB
Historically the probability of a positive October return for SEB is 36.51%. January offers the highest probability of a positive month at 86.89%, while September is the weakest seasonal window. Alphio blends this calendar with technical signals and similar chart pattern matching before it writes the forecast.
This page is for research only and is not investment advice. Models can be wrong. Past performance does not guarantee future results.