Who will attend a round of US-Iran peace talks by December 31?

$47.3K Vol
2027年1月1日
Active
機率趨勢
Steve Witkoff 70.5%
Jared Kushner 69.0%
Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf 66.0%
Abbas Araghchi 64.0%
Majid Takht-Ravanchi 51.5%

核心摘要

根據「Who will attend a round of US-Iran peace talks by December 31?」的最新預測市場資料,交易者已形成強烈共識。

目前,Steve Witkoff 以壓倒性的 72% 獲勝機率主導市場;Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf 以 70.5% 位居第二,Jared Kushner 以 67.5% 排名第三。該市場的下注量已達 $47.3K,反映出市場的高度關注。

競爭梯隊拆解

為了更好地評估各潛在結果的位置,可依據隱含機率與合約定價將市場劃分為三個明顯的交易梯隊:

🥇 第一梯隊:絕對領跑者

  • Steve Witkoff (72%):Steve Witkoff 目前擁有最高機率,深受訂單簿青睞。看好該結果的交易者面對的「Buy Yes」合約價為 72¢,顯示出市場的高度確信。僅該合約就已產生 $974 的成交量。

🥈 第二梯隊:主要挑戰者

  • Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf (70.5%):作為最可行的替代選項,Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf 保持著 70.5% 的成真機率,其「Buy Yes」份額目前成交價為 71¢。
  • Jared Kushner (67.5%):以 67.5% 的機率位列第三,市場對 Jared Kushner 持謹慎懷疑態度,除非勢頭轉變,否則視其為外圍黑馬。

🥉 第三梯隊:長尾選項(合計約 0%)

在前三名之外,還有大量宏觀變數與冷門結果被持續追蹤。儘管單個機率偏低,但它們是投機交易者的重要對沖:

  • 替代選項:包括 Abbas Araghchi (62.5%)、Majid Takht-Ravanchi (55%),以及 Masoud Pezeshkian (44.5%)。
  • 投機成交:儘管統計機率偏低,像 J.D. Vance 這類長尾合約仍吸引著可觀的關注。

完整訂單簿與定價面板

下表列出了該預測池中所有結果的合約價格、機率與市場深度的完整拆解:

排名預測結果獲勝機率成交量買入 Yes(成本)買入 No(成本)
1Steve Witkoff72.0%$97472¢28¢
2Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf70.5%$94971¢30¢
3Jared Kushner67.5%$93068¢33¢
4Abbas Araghchi62.5%$1.1K63¢38¢
5Majid Takht-Ravanchi55.0%$1.6K55¢45¢
6Masoud Pezeshkian44.5%$54945¢56¢
7J.D. Vance44.0%$2.2K44¢56¢
8Rafael Grossi37.5%$77338¢63¢
9Ishaq Dar33.0%$1.4K33¢67¢
10Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani26.0%$4.3K26¢74¢
11Marco Rubio23.0%$2.3K23¢77¢
12Kazem Gharibabadi19.5%$4.4K20¢81¢
13Nick Stewart17.5%$68718¢83¢
14Badr bin Hamad Al Busaidi16.0%$1.6K16¢84¢
15Ahmad Vahidi14.5%$2514¢86¢
16Donald Trump12.0%$5912¢88¢
17Esmail Qaani11.6%$1.8K12¢88¢
18Pete Hegseth5.5%$2.5K95¢
19Mojtaba Khamenei5.4%$19.1K95¢

裁決規則

This market will resolve to "Yes" if the listed individual attends any formal senior-level round of peace talks between representatives of the United States and Iran between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.

A qualifying round must be a deliberate in-person diplomatic meeting or negotiating round concerning US-Iran relations, involving senior representatives of both the United States and Iran who are acting in an official capacity and are authorized to conduct or materially direct diplomacy on behalf of their governments.

Indirect in-person diplomacy through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors will qualify, provided senior representatives of both the United States and Iran are participating in the same formal diplomatic process with the knowledge and authorization of their respective governments. The representatives need not be in the same room at the same time.

Follow-on technical talks from the June 22 Switzerland round will not qualify by themselves. Technical, staff-level, working-group, implementation, monitoring, preparatory, or deconfliction meetings will not qualify unless they occur as part of a new formally convened senior-level U.S.-Iran peace-talks round.

Brief greetings, chance encounters, photo opportunities, ceremonial appearances, or talks not deliberately aimed at diplomacy or negotiation will not count.

The meeting must be in-person (including indirect in-person meetings) and must be publicly acknowledged by either government or reported by a consensus of credible media. Remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count.

Attendance refers to the listed individual being physically present and actively participating.

If a formal senior-level round of peace talks between representatives of the United States and Iran takes place over multiple days, attendance at any part of the meeting will qualify.

The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the listed individual and the governments of the United States and Iran; however, a consensus of credible reporting will also be used.

AI 估值分析:發現市場錯誤定價與 EV 差

人群共識與投機成交塑造了更宏觀的預測市場,而我們的量化演算法提供了資料驅動的反向視角。透過分析基本面訊號、底層趨勢與歷史分布,我們的 AI 估值模型為每個結果獨立測算出一個「公允價值」機率。

將該公允價值與當前交易價值對比,可揭示出重大背離——即期望值(EV)差。正 EV 差代表統計上被低估的結果,而負 EV 差則提示市場可能存在反應過度。

頂級 AI Alpha 與錯誤定價套利機會

根據最新一輪資料模型測算,以下幾個關鍵合約存在顯著偏離:

  • 最被高估的結果:Majid Takht-Ravanchi 當前交易價為 55%,但我們的 AI 測算其公允價值僅為 37.5%,形成 -17.5% 的較大負 EV 差,表明人群可能過度炒作該結果、把溢價推得過高。
  • 最佳價值標的(最高 EV):我們的模型將 Marco Rubio 識別為盤面上最具價值的機會。市場僅給予其 23% 的交易機率,而我們 AI 的公允價值評估為 81.8%——形成可觀的 +58.8% EV 差。
  • 被忽視的黑馬:其他值得注意的偏離包括 Masoud Pezeshkian(EV 差:+55.5%)以及 Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani(EV 差:+46.1%)。儘管我們的預測模型給予更強的統計支撐,這些長尾機會仍被即時訂單簿大幅低估。
MarketTrade ValueFair ValueEV Gap
Steve Witkoff72.0%70.9%-1.1%
Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf70.5%72.4%+1.9%
Jared Kushner67.5%80.7%+13.2%
Abbas Araghchi62.5%48.9%-13.6%
Majid Takht-Ravanchi55.0%37.5%-17.5%
Masoud Pezeshkian44.5%100.0%+55.5%
J.D. Vance44.0%47.9%+3.9%
Rafael Grossi37.5%24.0%-13.5%
Ishaq Dar33.0%29.0%-4.0%
Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani26.0%72.1%+46.1%
Marco RubioBest EV23.0%81.8%+58.8%
Kazem Gharibabadi19.5%11.4%-8.1%
Nick Stewart17.5%1.0%-16.5%
Badr bin Hamad Al Busaidi16.0%57.0%+41.0%
Ahmad Vahidi14.5%14.1%-0.4%
Donald Trump12.0%13.0%+1.0%
Esmail Qaani11.6%8.9%-2.7%
Pete Hegseth5.5%9.5%+4.0%
Mojtaba Khamenei5.4%3.9%-1.5%

交易動態

以下是該事件的交易動態。

Aug 15, 2026

  • 08:29 PM
    0X0xF6c6A8
    $88.91

    Bought 118.54 No for Will Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026? at 0.75

  • 08:29 PM
    0X0xBD1c36
    $88.91

    Bought 118.54 No for Will Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026? at 0.75

  • 08:28 PM
    0X0xc26deA
    $54.13

    Bought 112.78 No for Will Majid Takht-Ravanchi attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026? at 0.48

  • 08:28 PM
    0X0xb3CC7F
    $54.13

    Bought 112.78 No for Will Majid Takht-Ravanchi attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026? at 0.48

  • 08:17 PM
    0X0xe9aD8f
    $3.85

    Bought 5 No for Will Marco Rubio attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026? at 0.77

  • 08:17 PM
    0X0xae491e
    $3.85

    Bought 5 No for Will Marco Rubio attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026? at 0.77

  • 06:35 PM
    0X0x7371e6
    $57.07

    Bought 158.54 No for Will Abbas Araghchi attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026? at 0.36

  • 06:32 PM
    0X0xb3CC7F
    $70.11

    Bought 159.33 No for Will Majid Takht-Ravanchi attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026? at 0.44

  • 06:32 PM
    0X0xF1128a
    $70.11

    Bought 159.33 No for Will Majid Takht-Ravanchi attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026? at 0.44

  • 06:23 PM
    0X0xBD1c36
    $118.52

    Bought 144.54 No for Will Nick Stewart attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026? at 0.82

  • 06:23 PM
    0X0x7371e6
    $118.52

    Bought 144.54 No for Will Nick Stewart attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026? at 0.82

  • 06:09 PM
    0X0xb3CC7F
    $64.56

    Bought 169.89 No for Will Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026? at 0.38

正在押注該事件的鯨魚錢包

AR1
ArmageddonRewardsBilly
Event PnL
-$27.20
Volume
$1,599.99
Positions
NoNoNo+2
VI2
vinii
Event PnL
+$67.05
Volume
$532.76
Positions
NoNoYes+4
AJ3
AJSV
Event PnL
+$9.28
Volume
$498.43
Positions
NoNoYes+13
TE4
Te0n2
Event PnL
+$27.70
Volume
$405.03
Positions
NoNoNo
PR5
PrayForPeace
Event PnL
+$19.90
Volume
$376.70
Positions
YesYesYes+1
FL6
Fluo
Event PnL
-$26.45
Volume
$371.57
Positions
NoNoNo+7
GU7
GuyFromTinder
Event PnL
-$52.13
Volume
$327.89
Positions
NoNoYes+3
OX8
OxfordExpress
Event PnL
-$16.74
Volume
$325.54
Positions
YesYesYes

常見問題

目前市場對「Who will attend a round of US-Iran peace talks by December 31?」的共識是什麼?

截至最新更新,Steve Witkoff 以 72% 的獲勝機率領跑,其次是 Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf(70.5%),以及 Jared Kushner(67.5%)。該市場總成交量已達 $47.3K,顯示出充足的流動性與高交易參與度。

AI 公允價值與即時市場交易價值有何不同?

即時市場交易價值反映的是公眾情緒、訂單簿動能與投機資金。我們的 AI 公允價值則由量化模型獨立計算,剔除情緒炒作、專注底層數據。兩者出現顯著背離時即形成 EV 差,提示市場對某個結果可能存在錯誤定價。

目前哪個結果的期望值(EV)最高?

最新一輪測算顯示,Marco Rubio 是最顯著的錯誤定價。市場對其隱含機率僅給到 23%,而我們的 AI 測算其公允價值為 81.8%——形成 +58.8% 的期望值差,是該市場中最具價值的標的。

市場共識是否對某個結果反應過度?

是的——資料顯示市場對 Majid Takht-Ravanchi 存在明顯的反應過度。人群把其即時交易價值推高至 55%,但我們的公允價值評估認為其真實機率僅為 37.5%,形成 -17.5% 的負 EV 差,表明該合約被高估。

長尾資料中是否藏有高價值的黑馬選項?

當然有。除了頭部結果之外,我們的模型在排名靠後的選項中發現了被低估的潛力。Masoud Pezeshkian 擁有 +55.5% 的正 EV 差,Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani 則為 +46.1%。儘管量化層面更有支撐,這些合約仍被即時訂單簿低估。

免費開始