$6.760
-0.387 (-5.72%)At close
- High
- 7.175
- Open
- 7.160
- VWAP
- 6.88
- Vol
- 170.37K
- Mkt Cap
- —
- Low
- 6.710
- Amount
- 1.17M
- EV/EBITDA, TTM
- 0.00
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. is a nuclear energy company focused on developing conventional uranium deposit combined with small modular reactor (SMR) technology, focused on vertical integration in the nuclear fuel cycle to support domestic energy independence and high-tech power demands. Its Aurora Uranium Project is situated within Malheur County in Southeastern Oregon, in the Quinn River Valley. Its area is covered by a thin layer of alluvium over lakebed sediments, which unconformably overlie interbedded dacite/rhyolite lava flows, tuffaceous units, pyroclastic breccia, and local fault breccia. Its site is 3 miles (4.8 kilometers) from the Nevada border and approximately 6 miles (9.7 kilometers) west of McDermitt, Nevada. It also develops small, long life (SLLIM) and very small, long life (VSLLIM) modular nuclear reactors. Its VSLLIM serves remote communities, defense applications, and mining sites. Its SLLIM serves communities and industrial projects, including data centers.
AI analysis of Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp (NUCL)
sellEagle Nuclear Energy Corp. (NUCL) is not a good buy right now due to its significant financial losses and negative momentum. The current price is $6.76, and the company has reported a staggering net income loss of $25,810,550 in Q2 2026. Additionally, the RSI is at 30.846, indicating that the stock is oversold, but this could also suggest further downside risk. The forward P/E ratio is 0, reflecting a lack of profitability, and the stock has a 5-day change of -7.27%, showing a downward trend. The main risk is the company's ongoing financial struggles, highlighted by a total equity drop to -$6,980,216 in Q2 2026, which raises concerns about its viability.
Valuation Metrics
Events Timeline
News
8.508-10NewsfilterEagle Nuclear Energy Positioned for Growth Amid U.S. Uranium Supply Deficit
8.508-05GlobenewswireEagle Nuclear Energy Engages Independent Auditor for Growth Strategy
8.508-03NewsfilterEagle Nuclear Energy Joins Global Uranium Index
8.507-27PRnewswireUranium Contract Prices Hit All-Time Highs Amid Policy Shifts
8.507-27NewsfilterUranium Prices Hit Record Highs as Eagle Nuclear Advances Projects
NUCL FAQ — answered by Alphio AI
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. is a nuclear energy company focused on developing conventional uranium deposit combined with small modular reactor (SMR) technology, focused on vertical integration in the nuclear fuel cycle to support domestic energy independence and high-tech power demands. Its Aurora Uranium Project is situated within Malheur County in Southeastern Oregon, in the Quinn River Valley. Its area is covered by a thin layer of alluvium over lakebed sediments, which unconformably overlie interbedded dacite/rhyolite lava flows, tuffaceous units, pyroclastic breccia, and local fault breccia. Its site is 3 miles (4.8 kilometers) from the Nevada border and approximately 6 miles (9.7 kilometers) west of McDermitt, Nevada. It also develops small, long life (SLLIM) and very small, long life (VSLLIM) modular nuclear reactors. Its VSLLIM serves remote communities, defense applications, and mining sites. Its SLLIM serves communities and industrial projects, including data centers. It operates in the Energy sector.
Eagle Nuclear Energy Corp. (NUCL) is not a good buy right now due to its significant financial losses and negative momentum. The current price is $6.76, and the company has reported a staggering net income loss of $25,810,550 in Q2 2026. Additionally, the RSI is at 30.846, indicating that the stock is oversold, but this could also suggest further downside risk. The forward P/E ratio is 0, reflecting a lack of profitability, and the stock has a 5-day change of -7.27%, showing a downward trend. The main risk is the company's ongoing financial struggles, highlighted by a total equity drop to -$6,980,216 in Q2 2026, which raises concerns about its viability.
This page is for research only and is not investment advice. Models can be wrong. Past performance does not guarantee future results.