Premier League: Teams relegated (2026-27)
核心摘要
根據「Premier League: Teams relegated (2026-27)」的最新預測市場資料,交易者已形成強烈共識。
目前,Coventry City 以壓倒性的 57.5% 獲勝機率主導市場;Hull City 以 53% 位居第二,Manchester City 以 44.5% 排名第三。該市場的下注量已達 $291.9K,反映出市場的高度關注。
競爭梯隊拆解
為了更好地評估各潛在結果的位置,可依據隱含機率與合約定價將市場劃分為三個明顯的交易梯隊:
🥇 第一梯隊:絕對領跑者
- Coventry City (57.5%):Coventry City 目前擁有最高機率,深受訂單簿青睞。看好該結果的交易者面對的「Buy Yes」合約價為 57¢,顯示出市場的高度確信。僅該合約就已產生 $8.9K 的成交量。
🥈 第二梯隊:主要挑戰者
- Hull City (53%):作為最可行的替代選項,Hull City 保持著 53% 的成真機率,其「Buy Yes」份額目前成交價為 53¢。
- Manchester City (44.5%):以 44.5% 的機率位列第三,市場對 Manchester City 持謹慎懷疑態度,除非勢頭轉變,否則視其為外圍黑馬。
🥉 第三梯隊:長尾選項(合計約 0%)
在前三名之外,還有大量宏觀變數與冷門結果被持續追蹤。儘管單個機率偏低,但它們是投機交易者的重要對沖:
- 替代選項:包括 Ipswich Town (35.5%)、Crystal Palace (27.5%),以及 Sunderland (26.5%)。
- 投機成交:儘管統計機率偏低,像 Fulham 這類長尾合約仍吸引著可觀的關注。
完整訂單簿與定價面板
下表列出了該預測池中所有結果的合約價格、機率與市場深度的完整拆解:
| 排名 | 預測結果 | 獲勝機率 | 成交量 | 買入 Yes(成本) | 買入 No(成本) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coventry City | 57.5% | $8.9K | 57¢ | 43¢ |
| 2 | Hull City | 53.0% | $67.1K | 53¢ | 47¢ |
| 3 | Manchester City | 44.5% | $111.3K | 44¢ | 56¢ |
| 4 | Ipswich Town | 35.5% | $10.0K | 36¢ | 65¢ |
| 5 | Crystal Palace | 27.5% | $4.4K | 28¢ | 73¢ |
| 6 | Sunderland | 26.5% | $6.3K | 27¢ | 74¢ |
| 7 | Fulham | 17.0% | $6.7K | 17¢ | 83¢ |
| 8 | Nottingham Forest | 16.0% | $7.1K | 16¢ | 84¢ |
| 9 | Newcastle United | 10.9% | $7.5K | 11¢ | 89¢ |
| 10 | Tottenham Hotspur | 6.5% | $13.7K | 7¢ | 94¢ |
| 11 | Bournemouth | 6.0% | $6.0K | 6¢ | 94¢ |
| 12 | Leeds United | 5.8% | $1.4K | 6¢ | 94¢ |
| 13 | Everton | 5.1% | $1.6K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 14 | Brentford | 4.3% | $15.3K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 15 | Aston Villa | 3.3% | $5.5K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 16 | Brighton & Hove Albion | 3.1% | $4.8K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 17 | Chelsea | 2.9% | $932 | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 18 | Liverpool | 2.9% | $2.7K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 19 | Manchester United | 2.4% | $9.0K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 20 | Arsenal | 2.3% | $1.7K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
裁決規則
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the listed team is relegated from Premier League at the conclusion of the 2026-27 Premier League season. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
Official relegation is defined as a team losing its place in Premier League for the following season through their final standing in the 2026-27 Premier League, via relegation playoff defeat, or by any other official league decision recognized by Premier League.
If the 2026-27 Premier League season is cancelled, postponed after June 30, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, or there are no teams confirmed for relegation within that timeframe, the corresponding market will resolve to "No".
The primary resolution source will be official announcements from Premier League. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
AI 估值分析:發現市場錯誤定價與 EV 差
人群共識與投機成交塑造了更宏觀的預測市場,而我們的量化演算法提供了資料驅動的反向視角。透過分析基本面訊號、底層趨勢與歷史分布,我們的 AI 估值模型為每個結果獨立測算出一個「公允價值」機率。
將該公允價值與當前交易價值對比,可揭示出重大背離——即期望值(EV)差。正 EV 差代表統計上被低估的結果,而負 EV 差則提示市場可能存在反應過度。
頂級 AI Alpha 與錯誤定價套利機會
根據最新一輪資料模型測算,以下幾個關鍵合約存在顯著偏離:
- 最被高估的結果:Manchester City 當前交易價為 44.5%,但我們的 AI 測算其公允價值僅為 32.7%,形成 -11.7% 的較大負 EV 差,表明人群可能過度炒作該結果、把溢價推得過高。
- 最佳價值標的(最高 EV):我們的模型將 Chelsea 識別為盤面上最具價值的機會。市場僅給予其 2.9% 的交易機率,而我們 AI 的公允價值評估為 19%——形成可觀的 +16.1% EV 差。
- 被忽視的黑馬:其他值得注意的偏離包括 Manchester United(EV 差:+13.6%)以及 Aston Villa(EV 差:+11.5%)。儘管我們的預測模型給予更強的統計支撐,這些長尾機會仍被即時訂單簿大幅低估。
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coventry City | 57.5% | 59.3% | +1.8% |
| Hull City | 53.0% | 54.1% | +1.1% |
| Manchester City | 44.5% | 32.7% | -11.7% |
| Ipswich Town | 35.5% | 37.1% | +1.6% |
| Crystal Palace | 27.5% | 30.1% | +2.6% |
| Sunderland | 26.5% | 24.7% | -1.8% |
| Fulham | 17.0% | 24.4% | +7.4% |
| Nottingham Forest | 16.0% | 12.7% | -3.3% |
| Newcastle United | 10.9% | 9.8% | -1.2% |
| Tottenham Hotspur | 6.5% | 12.6% | +6.1% |
| Bournemouth | 6.0% | 15.8% | +9.8% |
| Leeds United | 5.8% | 10.0% | +4.3% |
| Everton | 5.1% | 15.3% | +10.2% |
| Brentford | 4.3% | 9.6% | +5.2% |
| Aston Villa | 3.3% | 14.8% | +11.5% |
| Brighton & Hove Albion | 3.1% | 14.4% | +11.2% |
| ChelseaBest EV | 2.9% | 19.0% | +16.1% |
| Liverpool | 2.9% | 3.6% | +0.6% |
| Manchester United | 2.4% | 15.9% | +13.6% |
| Arsenal | 2.3% | 7.9% | +5.6% |
交易動態
以下是該事件的交易動態。
Oct 28, 2026
- 08:26 PMMIMillhouse2026$7.36
Sold 8 No for Will Tottenham Hotspur be relegated from the 2026-27 Premier League? at 0.92
- 08:26 PMMIMillhouse2026$7.36
Sold 8 No for Will Tottenham Hotspur be relegated from the 2026-27 Premier League? at 0.92
- 08:23 PMOBobliq$0.23
Sold 0.26 No for Will Newcastle United be relegated from the 2026-27 Premier League? at 0.88
- 07:37 PMRARazuchiONE$4.00
Sold 39.99 Yes for Will Newcastle United be relegated from the 2026-27 Premier League? at 0.1
- 07:27 PMRARazuchiDISNEY$3.53
Sold 35.34 Yes for Will Newcastle United be relegated from the 2026-27 Premier League? at 0.1
- 07:27 PMBOBOOST250$17.99
Bought 19.992653 No for Will Newcastle United be relegated from the 2026-27 Premier League? at 0.9
- 07:27 PMOBobliq$18.24
Bought 20.26666 No for Will Newcastle United be relegated from the 2026-27 Premier League? at 0.9
- 07:27 PMSEsebpredict$175.57
Bought 195.07777 No for Will Newcastle United be relegated from the 2026-27 Premier League? at 0.9
- 07:27 PMSOsongbird123$18.00
Bought 20 No for Will Newcastle United be relegated from the 2026-27 Premier League? at 0.9
- 07:22 PMCAcarrack-porcelain$3.00
Bought 6.382979 No for Will Hull City be relegated from the 2026-27 Premier League? at 0.47
- 06:17 PMBAbananabreakfast$1.62
Bought 6 Yes for Will Sunderland be relegated from the 2026-27 Premier League? at 0.27
- 03:08 PMNAnaconte2$1.91
Sold 4.16 No for Will Hull City be relegated from the 2026-27 Premier League? at 0.46
正在押注該事件的鯨魚錢包
常見問題
目前市場對「Premier League: Teams relegated (2026-27)」的共識是什麼?
截至最新更新,Coventry City 以 57.5% 的獲勝機率領跑,其次是 Hull City(53%),以及 Manchester City(44.5%)。該市場總成交量已達 $291.9K,顯示出充足的流動性與高交易參與度。
AI 公允價值與即時市場交易價值有何不同?
即時市場交易價值反映的是公眾情緒、訂單簿動能與投機資金。我們的 AI 公允價值則由量化模型獨立計算,剔除情緒炒作、專注底層數據。兩者出現顯著背離時即形成 EV 差,提示市場對某個結果可能存在錯誤定價。
目前哪個結果的期望值(EV)最高?
最新一輪測算顯示,Chelsea 是最顯著的錯誤定價。市場對其隱含機率僅給到 2.9%,而我們的 AI 測算其公允價值為 19%——形成 +16.1% 的期望值差,是該市場中最具價值的標的。
市場共識是否對某個結果反應過度?
是的——資料顯示市場對 Manchester City 存在明顯的反應過度。人群把其即時交易價值推高至 44.5%,但我們的公允價值評估認為其真實機率僅為 32.7%,形成 -11.7% 的負 EV 差,表明該合約被高估。
長尾資料中是否藏有高價值的黑馬選項?
當然有。除了頭部結果之外,我們的模型在排名靠後的選項中發現了被低估的潛力。Manchester United 擁有 +13.6% 的正 EV 差,Aston Villa 則為 +11.5%。儘管量化層面更有支撐,這些合約仍被即時訂單簿低估。
