
How many Senators will vote for the Clarity Act?
核心摘要
根據「How many Senators will vote for the Clarity Act?」的最新預測市場資料,交易者已形成強烈共識。
目前,Above 50 以壓倒性的 47.5% 獲勝機率主導市場;Above 58 以 36.5% 位居第二,Above 55 以 36% 排名第三。該市場的下注量已達 $78.1K,反映出市場的高度關注。
競爭梯隊拆解
為了更好地評估各潛在結果的位置,可依據隱含機率與合約定價將市場劃分為三個明顯的交易梯隊:
🥇 第一梯隊:絕對領跑者
- Above 50 (47.5%):Above 50 目前擁有最高機率,深受訂單簿青睞。看好該結果的交易者面對的「Buy Yes」合約價為 48¢,顯示出市場的高度確信。僅該合約就已產生 $32.7K 的成交量。
🥈 第二梯隊:主要挑戰者
- Above 58 (36.5%):作為最可行的替代選項,Above 58 保持著 36.5% 的成真機率,其「Buy Yes」份額目前成交價為 37¢。
- Above 55 (36%):以 36% 的機率位列第三,市場對 Above 55 持謹慎懷疑態度,除非勢頭轉變,否則視其為外圍黑馬。
🥉 第三梯隊:長尾選項(合計約 0%)
在前三名之外,還有大量宏觀變數與冷門結果被持續追蹤。儘管單個機率偏低,但它們是投機交易者的重要對沖:
- 替代選項:包括 Above 60 (30%)、Above 62 (19.5%),以及 Above 64 (17%)。
- 投機成交:儘管統計機率偏低,像 Above 66 這類長尾合約仍吸引著可觀的關注。
完整訂單簿與定價面板
下表列出了該預測池中所有結果的合約價格、機率與市場深度的完整拆解:
| 排名 | 預測結果 | 獲勝機率 | 成交量 | 買入 Yes(成本) | 買入 No(成本) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Above 50 | 47.5% | $32.7K | 48¢ | 53¢ |
| 2 | Above 58 | 36.5% | $6.9K | 37¢ | 64¢ |
| 3 | Above 55 | 36.0% | $9.0K | 36¢ | 64¢ |
| 4 | Above 60 | 30.0% | $8.7K | 30¢ | 70¢ |
| 5 | Above 62 | 19.5% | $10.5K | 20¢ | 81¢ |
| 6 | Above 64 | 17.0% | $3.9K | 17¢ | 83¢ |
| 7 | Above 66 | 8.0% | $4.7K | 8¢ | 92¢ |
| 8 | Above 68 | 3.6% | $1.9K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
裁決規則
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the number of Senators voting "Yea" on the first Senate vote on final passage of crypto market structure legislation occurring before January 1, 2027 is above the number specified in this market's title. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
"Above" means strictly greater than the number specified in the title. For example, a market titled "Above 58" will resolve to "Yes" only if 59 or more Senators vote "Yea".
For purposes of this market, "crypto market structure legislation" is defined identically to Polymarket's "Crypto Market Structure legislation becomes law in 2026?" market: https://polymarket.com/event/crypto-market-structure-legislation-becomes-law-in-2026-20260727223933088
The qualifying vote must be a vote on final passage of the bill conducted in the full Senate - not a committee vote, and not a vote on a motion to proceed, a motion to invoke cloture, or an amendment. Not every Senator needs to have participated in the vote. The first vote on final passage will be used for resolution regardless of whether the bill passes on that vote; subsequent votes on passage — including any re-vote following a motion to reconsider, or a vote on a conference report or House-amended version — will not be considered.
If no qualifying vote occurs before January 1, 2027, this market will resolve to "No". If qualifying legislation passes the Senate before January 1, 2027 without a prior recorded vote on final passage (e.g., passage by voice vote or unanimous consent), this market will resolve to "Yes" regardless of the number specified in this market's title.
Once the result of the vote has been announced, any subsequent request by a Senator to add, remove, or change a vote will not be considered for purposes of this market, regardless of any change to the official vote tally.
This market will resolve according to official records of the U.S. Senate (http://senate.gov) and Library of Congress (http://congress.gov).
AI 估值分析:發現市場錯誤定價與 EV 差
人群共識與投機成交塑造了更宏觀的預測市場,而我們的量化演算法提供了資料驅動的反向視角。透過分析基本面訊號、底層趨勢與歷史分布,我們的 AI 估值模型為每個結果獨立測算出一個「公允價值」機率。
將該公允價值與當前交易價值對比,可揭示出重大背離——即期望值(EV)差。正 EV 差代表統計上被低估的結果,而負 EV 差則提示市場可能存在反應過度。
頂級 AI Alpha 與錯誤定價套利機會
根據最新一輪資料模型測算,以下幾個關鍵合約存在顯著偏離:
- 最被高估的結果:Above 64 當前交易價為 17%,但我們的 AI 測算其公允價值僅為 11.7%,形成 -5.3% 的較大負 EV 差,表明人群可能過度炒作該結果、把溢價推得過高。
- 最佳價值標的(最高 EV):我們的模型將 Above 66 識別為盤面上最具價值的機會。市場僅給予其 8% 的交易機率,而我們 AI 的公允價值評估為 18.7%——形成可觀的 +10.7% EV 差。
- 被忽視的黑馬:其他值得注意的偏離包括 Above 60(EV 差:+8.6%)以及 Above 58(EV 差:+4.3%)。儘管我們的預測模型給予更強的統計支撐,這些長尾機會仍被即時訂單簿大幅低估。
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Above 50 | 47.5% | 53.8% | +6.3% |
| Above 58 | 36.5% | 40.8% | +4.3% |
| Above 55 | 36.0% | 36.6% | +0.6% |
| Above 60 | 30.0% | 38.6% | +8.6% |
| Above 62 | 19.5% | 22.3% | +2.7% |
| Above 64 | 17.0% | 11.7% | -5.3% |
| Above 66Best EV | 8.0% | 18.7% | +10.7% |
| Above 68 | 3.6% | 2.8% | -0.9% |
交易動態
以下是該事件的交易動態。
Sep 15, 2026
- 08:01 PMUMumbrella-labs$0.07
Sold 7 Yes for Will over 64 Senators vote for the Clarity Act? at 0.01
- 07:32 PMBIbig-bird1$0.06
Sold 0.07 No for Will over 50 Senators vote for the Clarity Act? at 0.84
- 07:32 PMTITigerManagmentSports$3.59
Sold 25.63 Yes for Will over 50 Senators vote for the Clarity Act? at 0.14
- 07:27 PMBIbig-bird1$0.05
Sold 0.06 No for Will over 50 Senators vote for the Clarity Act? at 0.84
- 07:27 PMRErexzander$17.20
Bought 20 No for Will over 50 Senators vote for the Clarity Act? at 0.86
- 07:27 PMRErexzander$16.80
Sold 20 No for Will over 50 Senators vote for the Clarity Act? at 0.84
- 07:27 PMBIbig-bird1$0.08
Sold 0.09 No for Will over 50 Senators vote for the Clarity Act? at 0.84
- 07:27 PMBIbig-bird1$0.05
Sold 0.06 No for Will over 50 Senators vote for the Clarity Act? at 0.84
- 07:27 PMBIbig-bird1$0.11
Sold 0.13 No for Will over 50 Senators vote for the Clarity Act? at 0.84
- 07:27 PMRErexzander$17.20
Bought 20 No for Will over 50 Senators vote for the Clarity Act? at 0.86
- 07:27 PMALalgo168$64.50
Bought 75 No for Will over 50 Senators vote for the Clarity Act? at 0.86
- 07:26 PMBIbig-bird1$0.14
Sold 0.17 No for Will over 50 Senators vote for the Clarity Act? at 0.84
正在押注該事件的鯨魚錢包
常見問題
目前市場對「How many Senators will vote for the Clarity Act?」的共識是什麼?
截至最新更新,Above 50 以 47.5% 的獲勝機率領跑,其次是 Above 58(36.5%),以及 Above 55(36%)。該市場總成交量已達 $78.1K,顯示出充足的流動性與高交易參與度。
AI 公允價值與即時市場交易價值有何不同?
即時市場交易價值反映的是公眾情緒、訂單簿動能與投機資金。我們的 AI 公允價值則由量化模型獨立計算,剔除情緒炒作、專注底層數據。兩者出現顯著背離時即形成 EV 差,提示市場對某個結果可能存在錯誤定價。
目前哪個結果的期望值(EV)最高?
最新一輪測算顯示,Above 66 是最顯著的錯誤定價。市場對其隱含機率僅給到 8%,而我們的 AI 測算其公允價值為 18.7%——形成 +10.7% 的期望值差,是該市場中最具價值的標的。
市場共識是否對某個結果反應過度?
是的——資料顯示市場對 Above 64 存在明顯的反應過度。人群把其即時交易價值推高至 17%,但我們的公允價值評估認為其真實機率僅為 11.7%,形成 -5.3% 的負 EV 差,表明該合約被高估。
長尾資料中是否藏有高價值的黑馬選項?
當然有。除了頭部結果之外,我們的模型在排名靠後的選項中發現了被低估的潛力。Above 60 擁有 +8.6% 的正 EV 差,Above 58 則為 +4.3%。儘管量化層面更有支撐,這些合約仍被即時訂單簿低估。
