
How many Jensen Huang affairs will be reported by December 31?
核心摘要
根据「How many Jensen Huang affairs will be reported by December 31?」的最新预测市场数据,交易者已形成强烈共识。
目前,3 以压倒性的 53% 获胜概率主导市场;4 以 25.5% 位居第二,5 以 6.5% 排名第三。该市场的下注量已达 $89.2K,反映出市场的高度关注。
竞争梯队拆解
为了更好地评估各潜在结果的位置,可依据隐含概率与合约定价将市场划分为三个明显的交易梯队:
🥇 第一梯队:绝对领跑者
- 3 (53%):3 目前拥有最高概率,深受订单簿青睐。看好该结果的交易者面对的「Buy Yes」合约价为 53¢,显示出市场的高度确信。仅该合约就已产生 $32.0K 的成交量。
🥈 第二梯队:主要挑战者
- 4 (25.5%):作为最可行的替代选项,4 保持着 25.5% 的成真概率,其「Buy Yes」份额目前成交价为 26¢。
- 5 (6.5%):以 6.5% 的概率位列第三,市场对 5 持谨慎怀疑态度,除非势头转变,否则视其为外围黑马。
🥉 第三梯队:长尾选项(合计约 15%)
在前三名之外,还有大量宏观变量与冷门结果被持续追踪。尽管单个概率偏低,但它们是投机交易者的重要对冲:
- 替代选项:包括 6 (6.5%),以及 7+ (6%)。
- 投机成交:尽管统计概率偏低,像 6 这类长尾合约仍吸引着可观的关注。
完整订单簿与定价面板
下表列出了该预测池中所有结果的合约价格、概率与市场深度的完整拆解:
| 排名 | 预测结果 | 获胜概率 | 成交量 | 买入 Yes(成本) | 买入 No(成本) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 53.0% | $32.0K | 53¢ | 47¢ |
| 2 | 4 | 25.5% | $22.0K | 26¢ | 75¢ |
| 3 | 5 | 6.5% | $10.8K | 7¢ | 94¢ |
| 4 | 6 | 6.5% | $6.9K | 7¢ | 94¢ |
| 5 | 7+ | 6.0% | $20.0K | 6¢ | 94¢ |
裁决规则
On November 8, 2026, Jensen Huang acknowledged in a message to NVIDIA employees that he had been unfaithful to his wife; news reports have identified the woman involved as Alice Huang. On November 11, 2026, The New York Times reported that Huang had also had an affair with Kimberly Powell, NVIDIA’s vice president of healthcare; Huang, Powell and NVIDIA have not confirmed that report. On November 12, 2026, Reuters reported that Huang had an intimate relationship with a second NVIDIA employee, whom it did not name.
This market will resolve according to the number of people with whom Jensen Huang has been reported to have had an affair as of December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. The count starts at three (Alice Huang, Kimberly Powell and the NVIDIA employee reported by Reuters) and increases by one for each additional person who is the subject of a qualifying report published by a qualifying outlet between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
An affair refers to a romantic or sexual relationship outside Jensen Huang’s marriage. The affair itself may have taken place at any time during his marriage; only the timing of the report matters.
The qualifying outlets are The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, Financial Times, Reuters, the Associated Press, CNN, Bloomberg, ABC News, CBS News, NBC News and Fox News. Only news articles published on an outlet’s own platform qualify; editorials, opinion pieces, columns, broadcast or video segments, podcasts, social media posts and sponsored content will not qualify.
A report will qualify if it meets any of the following:
1. presents the affair as fact;
2. reports the affair based on the outlet’s own sourcing, such as people familiar with the matter, documents or recordings (as in The New York Times’ November 11, 2026 report on Kimberly Powell);
3. reports an alleged affair between Jensen Huang and a specific person other than Alice Huang, Kimberly Powell, the employee reported by Reuters or anyone else already counted, regardless of whether the outlet presents the allegation as credible; or
4. reports that Jensen Huang, directly or through his official or legal representatives, has acknowledged such an affair.
Reports under 1 or 2 qualify whether or not the person involved is named, provided they clearly distinguish that person from Alice Huang, Kimberly Powell, the unnamed NVIDIA employee reported by Reuters and anyone else already counted. A report does so if it, or other reporting from a qualifying outlet, makes clear that the person is not someone already counted (e.g., by describing them as a third NVIDIA employee with whom Huang had a relationship, or as someone who has never worked at NVIDIA). A report confirming that Huang had affairs with at least a stated number of people will set the count to that number if it is higher than the count otherwise established.
If it is unclear whether a person in a report is someone already counted, that person will be treated as already counted, and this market will resolve to the lower number.
The following will not add to the count:
(i) reports that name or otherwise identify the NVIDIA employee reported by Reuters or anyone else already counted;
(ii) reports about any person, named or unnamed, that do not make clear, on their own or together with other reporting from a qualifying outlet, that the person is not someone already counted;
(iii) general references to Huang’s infidelity (e.g., “Huang has been unfaithful for a while”); and
(iv) allegations about an unnamed person that the outlet only relays from others, such as social media posts or other outlets’ reporting.
A report under 4 qualifies only if it reports an acknowledgment, including one in private testimony that has been made public, that names a person who is distinguished from those already counted as described above, or makes clear that Huang was unfaithful with more people than the count otherwise established (for example, by acknowledging affairs with four or more people). Reports of acknowledgments that are not explicit and unambiguous, or that are clearly sarcastic, made in jest or immediately clarified as not being genuine, will not qualify.
Alice Huang, Kimberly Powell and the NVIDIA employee reported by Reuters count toward the total even though they were reported before market creation. Any additional person counts only if a qualifying report about them is first published between market creation and December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Reports that only reference or link to articles published before market creation will not qualify unless they themselves meet the requirements above, and an article first published before market creation will qualify only if a later update first makes it meet those requirements, in which case the time of the update governs.
The resolution source for this market will be reporting from the qualifying outlets; for acknowledgments, official information from Jensen Huang or his official or legal representatives may also be used.
AI 估值分析:发现市场错误定价与 EV 差
人群共识与投机成交塑造了更宏观的预测市场,而我们的量化算法提供了数据驱动的反向视角。通过分析基本面信号、底层趋势与历史分布,我们的 AI 估值模型为每个结果独立测算出一个「公允价值」概率。
将该公允价值与当前交易价值对比,可揭示出重大背离——即期望值(EV)差。正 EV 差代表统计上被低估的结果,而负 EV 差则提示市场可能存在反应过度。
顶级 AI Alpha 与错误定价套利机会
根据最新一轮数据模型测算,以下几个关键合约存在显著偏离:
- 最被高估的结果:4 当前交易价为 25.5%,但我们的 AI 测算其公允价值仅为 13.2%,形成 -12.3% 的较大负 EV 差,表明人群可能过度炒作该结果、把溢价推得过高。
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 53.0% | 41.8% | -11.2% |
| 4 | 25.5% | 13.2% | -12.3% |
| 5 | 6.5% | 2.7% | -3.8% |
| 6 | 6.5% | 4.3% | -2.2% |
| 7+ | 6.0% | 5.3% | -0.7% |
交易动态
以下是该事件的交易动态。
Nov 13, 2026
- 01:10 PMDIDiplopia2$0.01
Bought 0.17 Yes for Will 5 Jensen Huang affairs be reported by December 31? at 0.07
- 01:08 PMLUlulu213$4.90
Bought 9.423077 No for Will 3 Jensen Huang affairs be reported by December 31? at 0.52
- 01:08 PM——$4.48
Bought 8.784314 No for Will 3 Jensen Huang affairs be reported by December 31? at 0.51
- 01:08 PMMOMONO67$24.08
Bought 47.22 No for Will 3 Jensen Huang affairs be reported by December 31? at 0.51
- 01:08 PMCIcigarettes$1.60
Bought 20 Yes for Will 7 or more Jensen Huang affairs be reported by December 31? at 0.08
- 01:08 PMCIcigarettes$1.20
Bought 20 Yes for Will 6 Jensen Huang affairs be reported by December 31? at 0.06
- 01:08 PMCIcigarettes$1.40
Bought 20 Yes for Will 5 Jensen Huang affairs be reported by December 31? at 0.07
- 01:08 PMCIcigarettes$5.60
Bought 20 Yes for Will 4 Jensen Huang affairs be reported by December 31? at 0.28
- 01:08 PMG.G.Hchen$153.00
Bought 300 No for Will 3 Jensen Huang affairs be reported by December 31? at 0.51
- 12:58 PMRRRR344KK$51.00
Bought 100 No for Will 3 Jensen Huang affairs be reported by December 31? at 0.51
- 12:57 PMRRRR344KK$51.00
Bought 100 No for Will 3 Jensen Huang affairs be reported by December 31? at 0.51
- 12:54 PMRHrhinogiraffe$2.96
Bought 37 Yes for Will 7 or more Jensen Huang affairs be reported by December 31? at 0.08
正在押注该事件的鲸鱼钱包
常见问题
当前市场对「How many Jensen Huang affairs will be reported by December 31?」的共识是什么?
截至最新更新,3 以 53% 的获胜概率领跑,其次是 4(25.5%),以及 5(6.5%)。该市场总成交量已达 $89.2K,显示出充足的流动性与高交易参与度。
AI 公允价值与实时市场交易价值有何不同?
实时市场交易价值反映的是公众情绪、订单簿动能与投机资金。我们的 AI 公允价值则由量化模型独立计算,剔除情绪炒作、专注底层数据。两者出现显著背离时即形成 EV 差,提示市场对某个结果可能存在错误定价。
市场共识是否对某个结果反应过度?
是的——数据显示市场对 4 存在明显的反应过度。人群把其实时交易价值推高至 25.5%,但我们的公允价值评估认为其真实概率仅为 13.2%,形成 -12.3% 的负 EV 差,表明该合约被高估。
