返回 Skill 市集

Risk & Control

liquidity-analysis

This Skill performs DEX liquidity-depth assessment and pool-composition analysis for Solana tokens to support pre-trade decisioning and risk management.

45 天前更新1 分鐘內設定完

總覽

This Skill performs DEX liquidity-depth assessment and pool-composition analysis for Solana tokens to support pre-trade decisioning and risk management.

This Skill performs DEX liquidity-depth assessment and pool-composition analysis for Solana tokens to support pre-trade decisioning and risk management. Key features include TVL and per-price-range depth calculations, slippage-estimation and slippage-curve plotting for arbitrary trade sizes, detection of concentrated-liquidity (CLMM) vs constant-product behavior, and heuristics for rug-risk (single-wallet LP ownership, unlocked LP tokens, newly-created or thin pools). Use cases include position-sizing guidance (rule-of-thumb: keep trade size under ~2% of pool depth), execution-cost forecasting, exit planning, LP due diligence, and automated alerts for risky pools. Core advantages are reduced execution cost and unexpected slippage, earlier detection of rug-pull vectors, and clear, quantitative inputs for trade sizing and order routing on Solana AMMs.

Skill.md

這個 Skill 如何運作

This Skill performs DEX liquidity-depth assessment and pool-composition analysis for Solana tokens to support pre-trade decisioning and risk management.

SKILL.mdALPHIO / 已驗證

Liquidity Analysis — DEX Depth Assessment for Solana Tokens

Liquidity analysis answers three critical questions before every trade: Can I get in at a reasonable price? Can I get out when I need to? and Is this pool safe? Without it, you risk excessive slippage, failed exits, and rug pulls.

Why Liquidity Analysis Matters

Position sizing: Maximum position size is bounded by available liquidity. A $10K position in a pool with $20K TVL will move the price significantly. Rule of thumb: keep trade size under 2% of pool depth to limit slippage below 1%.

Execution cost: Slippage is a direct cost. On a 5 SOL buy, the difference between 0.3% and 3% slippage is real money lost on every entry and exit.

Rug risk detection: Thin liquidity, single pools, unlocked LP tokens, and newly created pools are warning signs. Liquidity analysis catches these before you enter.

Exit planning: Entry liquidity may differ from exit liquidity. If LP is unlocked and owned by one wallet, it can be pulled at any time.

Key Concepts

Total Value Locked (TVL)

Total value of assets deposited in a pool. For a SOL/TOKEN pool with 100 SOL and 1M TOKEN at $0.01 each, TVL = 100 * SOL_price + 1M * $0.01. TVL alone is insufficient — you need depth at the current price range.

Liquidity Depth

How much can be traded before moving the price X%. In constant-product AMMs, depth is uniform. In concentrated liquidity (CLMM), depth varies by price range — thick near the current price, thin or zero outside active ranges.

Concentration Factor (CLMM)

Concentrated liquidity pools focus capital in a narrow price range, providing deeper liquidity within that range but nothing outside it. A pool with $50K TVL concentrated in a +/-5% range provides the same depth as a $500K constant-product pool within that range, but zero depth beyond it.

Slippage Curve

Slippage is not linear. Plotting slippage against trade size produces a curve that's gentle for small trades and steep for large ones. The shape depends on pool type, TVL, and concentration.

Pool Composition

Who provides liquidity matters. Locked LP tokens cannot be withdrawn (safer). Single-sided liquidity means the pool is imbalanced. Pool age indicates stability — pools older than 7 days with consistent TVL are more reliable.

Data Sources

Four complementary data sources, from free to comprehensive:

SourceAuth RequiredBest ForLimitations
DexScreenerNoneQuick pool lookup, liquidity.usdNo on-chain pool details
Jupiter Quote APINoneEmpirical slippage at any sizeAggregate across pools
BirdeyeAPI keyDetailed pool data, trade historyRate limited on free tier
On-chainRPC onlyLP lock status, exact reservesRequires program knowledge

See references/data_sources.md for complete endpoint documentation and usage examples.

Core Analysis Pipeline

Step 1: Identify Pools

Fetch all pools for a token. Most Solana tokens have multiple pools across Raydium, Orca, and Meteora.

import httpx

def get_pools(mint: str) -> list[dict]:
    """Fetch all DEX pools for a token from DexScreener."""
    resp = httpx.get(f"https://api.dexscreener.com/tokens/v1/solana/{mint}")
    resp.raise_for_status()
    pairs = resp.json()
    return [p for p in pairs if p.get("liquidity", {}).get("usd", 0) > 0]

Step 2: Measure Depth

For each pool, extract liquidity metrics:

def extract_depth(pool: dict) -> dict:
    """Extract liquidity metrics from a DexScreener pool."""
    return {
        "dex": pool.get("dexId", "unknown"),
        "liquidity_usd": pool.get("liquidity", {}).get("usd", 0),
        "volume_24h": pool.get("volume", {}).get("h24", 0),
        "pool_age_hours": _pool_age_hours(pool.get("pairCreatedAt", 0)),
        "pair_address": pool.get("pairAddress", ""),
    }

Step 3: Estimate Slippage

Use Jupiter quotes at multiple sizes to build an empirical slippage curve. This captures real routing across all pools:

import httpx

SOL_MINT = "So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112"
LAMPORTS = 1_000_000_000

async def estimate_slippage(token_mint: str, sol_amounts: list[float]) -> list[dict]:
    """Query Jupiter for slippage at multiple trade sizes.

    Args:
        token_mint: Token mint address to buy.
        sol_amounts: List of SOL amounts to test (e.g., [0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10]).

    Returns:
        List of dicts with sol_amount, output_tokens, price_per_token, slippage_bps.
    """
    results = []
    base_price = None
    async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
        for sol in sol_amounts:
            lamports = int(sol * LAMPORTS)
            resp = await client.get(
                "https://api.jup.ag/quote/v1",
                params={
                    "inputMint": SOL_MINT,
                    "outputMint": token_mint,
                    "amount": str(lamports),
                    "slippageBps": 5000,
                },
            )
            if resp.status_code != 200:
                continue
            data = resp.json()
            out_amount = int(data["outAmount"])
            price = sol / out_amount if out_amount > 0 else 0
            if base_price is None:
                base_price = price
            slippage_bps = int((price - base_price) / base_price * 10000) if base_price > 0 else 0
            results.append({
                "sol_amount": sol,
                "output_tokens": out_amount,
                "price_per_token": price,
                "slippage_bps": max(0, slippage_bps),
            })
    return results

Step 4: Assess Concentration

For CLMM pools (Orca Whirlpool, Raydium CLMM, Meteora DLMM), liquidity may be concentrated in a narrow range. Check if the current price is within the active range and how deep liquidity extends:

def assess_concentration(pools: list[dict]) -> dict:
    """Assess concentration risk from pool data."""
    clmm_pools = [p for p in pools if p.get("dexId") in ("raydium", "orca") and "clmm" in p.get("labels", [])]
    cpmm_pools = [p for p in pools if p not in clmm_pools]

    total_clmm = sum(p.get("liquidity", {}).get("usd", 0) for p in clmm_pools)
    total_cpmm = sum(p.get("liquidity", {}).get("usd", 0) for p in cpmm_pools)
    total = total_clmm + total_cpmm

    return {
        "clmm_ratio": total_clmm / total if total > 0 else 0,
        "cpmm_liquidity": total_cpmm,
        "clmm_liquidity": total_clmm,
        "concentration_risk": "high" if total_clmm / total > 0.8 and total > 0 else "low",
    }

Step 5: Compute Liquidity Score

Composite score from 0 (dangerous) to 100 (deep, safe liquidity):

def compute_liquidity_score(
    total_liquidity_usd: float,
    pool_count: int,
    largest_pool_pct: float,
    oldest_pool_hours: float,
    max_slippage_bps_at_1sol: int,
) -> int:
    """Compute composite liquidity score (0-100).

    Components:
        Depth (40%): log-scaled TVL from $1K (0) to $1M+ (40)
        Diversity (15%): more pools = more resilient
        Concentration (15%): penalty if one pool dominates
        Age (15%): older pools are more reliable
        Slippage (15%): lower slippage = better
    """
    import math
    # Depth: 0-40 points
    depth = min(40, int(40 * math.log10(max(total_liquidity_usd, 1)) / 6))

    # Diversity: 0-15 points
    diversity = min(15, pool_count * 3)

    # Concentration: 0-15 points (penalty for single-pool dominance)
    concentration = int(15 * (1 - largest_pool_pct))

    # Age: 0-15 points (7+ days = full marks)
    age = min(15, int(15 * oldest_pool_hours / 168))

    # Slippage: 0-15 points
    slippage = max(0, 15 - max_slippage_bps_at_1sol // 10)

    return max(0, min(100, depth + diversity + concentration + age + slippage))

Risk Flags

Flag these conditions before entering any position:

最適合用於

何時使用

This Skill performs DEX liquidity-depth assessment and pool-composition analysis for Solana tokens to support pre-trade decisioning and risk management.

01 · 會前準備

準備決策簡報

在投資委員會開會前,把零散證據整理成結構化的論據。

02 · 團隊協作

統一交接標準

讓分析師、投資組合經理與 Agent 產出一致的研究結果。

03 · 即時更新

更新投資邏輯

出現新催化劑、KPI 發布或財報結果後,更新情境假設。

社群回饋

越用越好用。

隨著 Skill 被使用與評審,回饋將顯示在這裡。

提交回饋

探索更多

相關 Skills

查看全部
免費開始