
Fundamentals & Valuation
Financial Due Diligence Analyzer
Financial Due Diligence Analyzer runs comprehensive, repeatable financial diligence for acquisitions, investments, and partnerships. Built for PE firms, corporate development teams, and founders, it ingests financial statements, revenue breakdowns, and deal terms — even partial data — to produce a s
總覽
Financial Due Diligence Analyzer runs comprehensive, repeatable financial diligence for acquisitions, investments, and partnerships.
Financial Due Diligence Analyzer runs comprehensive, repeatable financial diligence for acquisitions, investments, and partnerships. Built for PE firms, corporate development teams, and founders, it ingests financial statements, revenue breakdowns, and deal terms — even partial data — to produce a structured diligence package with findings, quantified risks, and negotiation points. Key features include a Quality of Earnings (QoE) engine with EBITDA normalization checklists and run-rate adjustments; Working Capital analysis with NWC trends, peg calculations, and seasonal adjustments; Revenue Quality scoring with customer concentration, churn, and cohort analysis; Debt & Liabilities discovery for off-balance-sheet and contingent obligations; Cash Flow Bridge from EBITDA to free cash flow and capex forecasting; and a Red Flag Scanner ranking 23 common deal-killers. Use it to standardize diligence, accelerate deal decisioning, and surface actionable remediation and valuation adjustments.
Skill.md
這個 Skill 如何運作
Financial Due Diligence Analyzer runs comprehensive, repeatable financial diligence for acquisitions, investments, and partnerships. Built for PE firms, corporate development teams, and founders, it ingests financial statements, revenue breakdowns, and deal terms — even partial data — to produce a s
Run comprehensive financial due diligence on acquisition targets, investment opportunities, or partnership prospects. Built for PE firms, corporate development teams, and founders evaluating deals.
What This Does
Generates a complete due diligence package:
- Quality of Earnings (QoE) — normalize EBITDA, strip one-time items, identify recurring vs non-recurring revenue
- Working Capital Analysis — NWC trends, peg calculation, seasonal adjustments
- Revenue Quality — customer concentration, churn, cohort analysis, contract backlog
- Debt & Liabilities — hidden obligations, off-balance-sheet items, contingent liabilities
- Cash Flow Bridge — EBITDA to free cash flow conversion, capex requirements
- Red Flag Scanner — 23 common deal-killers ranked by severity
How to Use
Tell your agent: "Run financial due diligence on [company/deal]"
Provide what you have:
- Financial statements (P&L, balance sheet, cash flow) — even partial
- Revenue breakdown by customer/product
- Known deal terms (purchase price, structure)
The agent will generate a structured diligence report with findings, risks, and negotiation points.
QoE Framework
EBITDA Normalization Checklist
| Adjustment Category | Common Items | Direction |
|---|---|---|
| Owner compensation | Above/below market salary, personal expenses | +/- |
| One-time revenue | PPP loans, insurance claims, litigation settlements | - |
| One-time expenses | Restructuring, M&A costs, natural disaster | + |
| Related party | Above/below market rent, intercompany charges | +/- |
| Accounting changes | Revenue recognition timing, reserve adjustments | +/- |
| Run-rate adjustments | New contracts, lost customers, price changes | +/- |
Revenue Quality Score (0-100)
| Factor | Weight | Scoring |
|---|---|---|
| Recurring vs one-time | 25% | >80% recurring = 25, >60% = 18, >40% = 12, <40% = 5 |
| Customer concentration | 20% | Top customer <10% = 20, <20% = 15, <30% = 10, >30% = 3 |
| Retention rate | 20% | >95% = 20, >90% = 15, >85% = 10, <85% = 5 |
| Contract backlog | 15% | >12mo coverage = 15, >6mo = 10, >3mo = 6, <3mo = 2 |
| Growth trajectory | 10% | >30% YoY = 10, >15% = 7, >5% = 4, declining = 1 |
| Pricing power | 10% | Annual increases + low churn = 10, some = 6, none = 2 |
Working Capital Peg
NWC Peg = Average of trailing 12 months normalized NWC
Normalized NWC = Current Assets (excl. cash) - Current Liabilities (excl. debt)
Adjustments:
- Remove seasonal spikes (use monthly data, not quarterly)
- Strip one-time receivables/payables
- Normalize inventory to steady-state
- Adjust for known post-close changes
If NWC at close > Peg → Seller receives difference
If NWC at close < Peg → Buyer receives difference
Red Flag Scanner (23 Points)
Critical (Deal-killers)
- Revenue concentration >40% single customer
- Declining revenue with no credible turnaround plan
- Negative or deteriorating cash conversion (EBITDA to FCF <50%)
- Undisclosed litigation or regulatory action
- Key person dependency with no succession plan
- Material related-party transactions at off-market terms
- Unrecorded liabilities (tax, environmental, legal)
Serious (Price adjustments)
- Customer churn accelerating quarter-over-quarter
- Gross margin compression >200bps annually
- Capex requirements understated (deferred maintenance)
- Working capital trends moving against buyer
- Aggressive revenue recognition policies
- Unusual pre-close transactions (dividends, bonuses)
- Technology debt requiring material investment
- Regulatory changes threatening core business model
Notable (Negotiation points)
- Management team retention risk
- Vendor concentration >30% single supplier
- IP ownership gaps or licensing dependencies
- Insurance coverage gaps
- Environmental liabilities (real estate)
- Employee benefit obligations (pension, OPEB)
- Tax position optimization opportunities
- Integration complexity indicators
Valuation Sanity Check
Quick Multiples Reference (2025-2026)
| Sector | EV/Revenue | EV/EBITDA | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| SaaS (<$10M ARR) | 4-8x | 15-25x | Higher for >120% NRR |
| SaaS ($10-50M ARR) | 6-12x | 20-35x | Rule of 40 premium |
| Professional Services | 1-2x | 8-12x | People-dependent discount |
| Manufacturing | 0.5-1.5x | 6-10x | Asset-heavy adjustment |
| Healthcare Services | 1-3x | 10-15x | Regulatory moat premium |
| Fintech | 5-15x | 20-40x | Wide range, growth-dependent |
| E-commerce | 1-3x | 10-18x | Brand and margin quality |
Purchase Price Allocation
Enterprise Value
- Net Debt (total debt - cash)
- Transaction Expenses
- Working Capital Adjustment (vs Peg)
+ Earnout (if applicable, risk-adjusted at 50-70% probability)
= Equity Value to Seller
Output Format
Your due diligence report should include:
- Executive Summary — deal overview, key findings, go/no-go recommendation
- Quality of Earnings — normalized EBITDA bridge with adjustments
- Revenue Analysis — quality score, concentration, trends
- Working Capital — NWC peg, seasonal analysis, close estimate
- Cash Flow — EBITDA to FCF bridge, capex analysis
- Red Flags — scored findings with severity and $ impact
- Valuation Check — multiples comparison, sanity test
- Negotiation Points — specific items for purchase agreement
Built by AfrexAI — AI context packs for business operations ($47 each).
More tools:
- AI Revenue Leak Calculator — Find where you're losing money
- Agent Setup Wizard — Deploy AI agents in minutes
- Full Context Pack Store — 10 industry packs, $47 each
最適合用於
何時使用
Financial Due Diligence Analyzer runs comprehensive, repeatable financial diligence for acquisitions, investments, and partnerships. Built for PE firms, corporate development teams, and founders, it ingests financial statements, revenue breakdowns, and deal terms — even partial data — to produce a s

01 · 會前準備
準備決策簡報
在投資委員會開會前,把零散證據整理成結構化的論據。

02 · 團隊協作
統一交接標準
讓分析師、投資組合經理與 Agent 產出一致的研究結果。

03 · 即時更新
更新投資邏輯
出現新催化劑、KPI 發布或財報結果後,更新情境假設。
社群回饋
越用越好用。
隨著 Skill 被使用與評審,回饋將顯示在這裡。
探索更多
相關 Skills
查看全部Industry Primer
Analyze an industry's structure, profit pools, key players, supply chain, and regime drivers. Use when starting research on an industry, mapping market structure, or framing sector-level opportunity…
Bear Case Builder
Stress test consensus with bearish counter-narratives, failure modes, and probability-severity analysis. Use when building downside cases, short theses, or risk scenarios against a bullish narrative.
Business Model Comp Matching
Match a company to the right peer set by business model, revenue mix, margin structure, and economics. Use when standard comp sets are misleading or when the user asks for more precise peer selection.