
Who will be the next Secretary-General of the UN?
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Who will be the next Secretary-General of the UN?”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Rebeca Grynspan is dominating the market with an overwhelming 36.1% chance of winning. Achim Steiner follows in second place at 34.5%, while Colombe Cahen-Salvador sits in third with 32.3%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $84.7K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Rebeca Grynspan (36.1%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Rebeca Grynspan is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 36¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $5.5K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Achim Steiner (34.5%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Achim Steiner maintains a 34.5% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 35¢.
- Colombe Cahen-Salvador (32.3%): Sitting in third place with a 32.3% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Colombe Cahen-Salvador, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~0%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes Rafael Grossi (20.5%), Maria Fernanda Espinosa Garcés (14.1%), and David Choquehuanca (7%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Jacinda Ardern are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rebeca Grynspan | 36.1% | $5.5K | 36¢ | 64¢ |
| 2 | Achim Steiner | 34.5% | $2.6K | 35¢ | 66¢ |
| 3 | Colombe Cahen-Salvador | 32.3% | $2.7K | 32¢ | 68¢ |
| 4 | Rafael Grossi | 20.5% | $23.2K | 21¢ | 80¢ |
| 5 | Maria Fernanda Espinosa Garcés | 14.1% | $3.1K | 14¢ | 86¢ |
| 6 | David Choquehuanca | 7.0% | $2.6K | 7¢ | 93¢ |
| 7 | Jacinda Ardern | 3.8% | $1.9K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 8 | Vuk Jeremić | 2.2% | $2.6K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 9 | Bruno Donat | 1.0% | $2.4K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 10 | Amina Mohammed | 1.0% | $3.9K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 11 | Mia Mottley | 1.0% | $2.1K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 12 | Kristalina Georgieva | 0.8% | $1.9K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 13 | Michelle Bachelet | 0.6% | $28.2K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 14 | Alicia Bárcena | 0.4% | $2.1K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
Result Rules
A United Nations Secretary-General selection is expected to be held in 2026 to choose the next Secretary-General of the United Nations.
This market will resolve according to the listed person who is officially chosen to be the next Secretary-General of the United Nations in this selection process.
Temporary, interim, or placeholder Secretary-Generals appointed before the next Secretary-General selection will not count.
If no United Nations Secretary-General selection takes place or the results of this selection are not known by February 28, 2027, this market will resolve to "Other".
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the United Nations; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Achim Steiner currently trades at 34.5%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 1%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -33.5%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Rafael Grossi as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 20.5% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 42.3% — yielding an impressive +21.8% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Bruno Donat (EV Gap: +7.2%) and Alicia Bárcena (EV Gap: +5.7%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rebeca Grynspan | 36.1% | 30.3% | -5.8% |
| Achim Steiner | 34.5% | 1.0% | -33.5% |
| Colombe Cahen-Salvador | 32.3% | 1.1% | -31.2% |
| Rafael GrossiBest EV | 20.5% | 42.3% | +21.8% |
| Maria Fernanda Espinosa Garcés | 14.1% | 8.8% | -5.3% |
| David Choquehuanca | 7.0% | 0.7% | -6.3% |
| Jacinda Ardern | 3.8% | 2.1% | -1.6% |
| Vuk Jeremić | 2.2% | 0.5% | -1.7% |
| Bruno Donat | 1.0% | 8.2% | +7.2% |
| Amina Mohammed | 1.0% | 6.0% | +5.0% |
| Mia Mottley | 1.0% | 0.7% | -0.4% |
| Kristalina Georgieva | 0.8% | 4.8% | +4.0% |
| Michelle Bachelet | 0.6% | 4.6% | +4.0% |
| Alicia Bárcena | 0.4% | 6.1% | +5.7% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Sep 21, 2026
- 05:59 PMSMsmallreceipt$20.00
Bought 20 No for Will Achim Steiner be the next Secretary General of the United Nations? at 1
- 05:59 PMHAhaveagoodday$5.00
Bought 5 No for Will Amina Mohammed be the next Secretary General of the United Nations? at 1
- 05:59 PMNOnorthdrawer$20.00
Bought 20 No for Will Vuk Jeremić be the next Secretary General of the United Nations? at 1
- 05:59 PMGRgraynotebook19$10.00
Bought 10 No for Will Kristalina Georgieva be the next Secretary General of the United Nations? at 1
- 05:59 PMGOgodblessme2026$19.80
Bought 20 No for Will Maria Fernanda Espinosa Garcés be the next Secretary General of the United Nations? at 0.99
- 05:59 PMGOgod83743894$5.00
Bought 5 No for Will Alicia Bárcena be the next Secretary General of the United Nations? at 1
- 05:59 PMGOgodblessme2026$19.80
Bought 20 No for Will Jacinda Ardern be the next Secretary General of the United Nations? at 0.99
- 05:59 PMQUquietparcel$19.00
Bought 20 No for Will Rafael Grossi be the next Secretary General of the United Nations? at 0.95
- 05:59 PMMImildwindow27$5.00
Bought 5 No for Will Bruno Donat be the next Secretary General of the United Nations? at 1
- 05:59 PMPLplainfolder$20.00
Bought 20 No for Will Colombe Cahen-Salvador be the next Secretary General of the United Nations? at 1
- 05:59 PMKAkakadu12$34.09
Sold 103.31 No for Will Rebeca Grynspan be the next Secretary General of the United Nations? at 0.33
- 05:59 PMGOgodblessme2026$20.00
Bought 20 No for Will Michelle Bachelet be the next Secretary General of the United Nations? at 1
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "Who will be the next Secretary-General of the UN?"?
As of the latest update, Rebeca Grynspan leads the field as the frontrunner with a 36.1% win probability, followed by Achim Steiner at 34.5% and Colombe Cahen-Salvador at 32.3%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $84.7K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Rafael Grossi as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 20.5% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 42.3% — an Expected Value gap of +21.8%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Achim Steiner. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 34.5%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 1%, a negative EV Gap of -33.5% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Bruno Donat holds a positive EV Gap of +7.2%, and Alicia Bárcena shows +5.7%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
