
Who will be the next UFC Pound-For-Pound #1 in 2026?
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Who will be the next UFC Pound-For-Pound #1 in 2026?”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Islam/None in 2026 is dominating the market with an overwhelming 95.2% chance of winning. Khamzat Chimaev follows in second place at 2.4%, while Alexander Volkanovski sits in third with 1.2%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $602.1K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Islam/None in 2026 (95.2%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Islam/None in 2026 is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 95¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $5.3K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Khamzat Chimaev (2.4%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Khamzat Chimaev maintains a 2.4% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 2¢.
- Alexander Volkanovski (1.2%): Sitting in third place with a 1.2% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Alexander Volkanovski, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~1.3%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes Petr Yan (1%), Ilia Topuria (0.4%), and Tom Aspinall (0.3%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Alexandre Pantoja are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Islam/None in 2026 | 95.2% | $5.3K | 95¢ | 5¢ |
| 2 | Khamzat Chimaev | 2.4% | $2.9K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 3 | Alexander Volkanovski | 1.2% | $567.8K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 4 | Petr Yan | 1.0% | $2.3K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 5 | Ilia Topuria | 0.4% | $3.8K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 6 | Tom Aspinall | 0.3% | $2.2K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 7 | Alexandre Pantoja | 0.2% | $1.6K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 8 | Dricus Du Plessis | 0.2% | $1.5K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 9 | Arman Tsarukyan | 0.1% | $5.4K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 10 | Alex Pereira | 0.1% | $2.8K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 11 | Merab Dvalishvili | 0.1% | $1.3K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 12 | Max Holloway | 0.1% | $887 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 13 | Joshua Van | 0.1% | $2.3K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 14 | Magomed Ankalaev | 0.1% | $718 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 15 | Jack Della Maddalena | 0.1% | $1.3K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve according to the next UFC fighter to be ranked 1st in the UFC Pound-For-Pound rankings, following Islam Makhachev.
If Islam Makhachev remains #1 in the UFC Pound-For-Pound rankings through December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, or there is otherwise no next UFC fighter to be ranked 1st in the Pound-For-Pound rankings within this timeframe, this market will resolve to “Islam/No Next #1 in 2026”.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from the UFC (https://www.ufc.com/athletes).
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Islam/None in 2026 currently trades at 95.2%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 35.8%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -59.4%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Ilia Topuria as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 0.4% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 33.2% — yielding an impressive +32.8% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Merab Dvalishvili (EV Gap: +25.1%) and Max Holloway (EV Gap: +21.6%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Islam/None in 2026 | 95.2% | 35.8% | -59.4% |
| Khamzat Chimaev | 2.4% | 7.3% | +4.9% |
| Alexander Volkanovski | 1.2% | 0.6% | -0.6% |
| Petr Yan | 1.0% | 0.4% | -0.6% |
| Ilia TopuriaBest EV | 0.4% | 33.2% | +32.8% |
| Tom Aspinall | 0.3% | 4.7% | +4.5% |
| Alexandre Pantoja | 0.2% | 2.8% | +2.6% |
| Dricus Du Plessis | 0.2% | 18.3% | +18.1% |
| Arman Tsarukyan | 0.1% | 6.7% | +6.6% |
| Alex Pereira | 0.1% | 16.4% | +16.3% |
| Merab Dvalishvili | 0.1% | 25.2% | +25.1% |
| Max Holloway | 0.1% | 21.6% | +21.6% |
| Joshua Van | 0.1% | 12.6% | +12.5% |
| Magomed Ankalaev | 0.1% | 12.6% | +12.5% |
| Jack Della Maddalena | 0.1% | 21.3% | +21.3% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Oct 24, 2026
- 06:20 PM0X0xf9a4D29F121bf6446A67C3C9181c4eb6e80b5E8F-1782759996075$3.00
Bought 150 Yes for Will Alexander Volkanovski be the next fighter to be ranked first in the UFC Pound-For-Pound Rankings in 2026? at 0.02
- 07:21 AMAJAJSV$1.22
Bought 40.714286 Yes for Will Khamzat Chimaev be the next fighter to be ranked first in the UFC Pound-For-Pound Rankings in 2026? at 0.03
- 05:49 AM0X0xf9a4D29F121bf6446A67C3C9181c4eb6e80b5E8F-1782759996075$0.35
Bought 34.94 Yes for Will Alexander Volkanovski be the next fighter to be ranked first in the UFC Pound-For-Pound Rankings in 2026? at 0.01
Oct 22, 2026
- 04:20 PMNINIDALAVADALA$0.83
Bought 83.333334 Yes for Will Petr Yan be the next fighter to be ranked first in the UFC Pound-For-Pound Rankings in 2026? at 0.01
- 12:42 PMMEMeowie2k$24.83
Bought 25.6 No for Will Khamzat Chimaev be the next fighter to be ranked first in the UFC Pound-For-Pound Rankings in 2026? at 0.97
Oct 21, 2026
- 02:38 AMPPPPMT$0.18
Sold 18 Yes for Will Khamzat Chimaev be the next fighter to be ranked first in the UFC Pound-For-Pound Rankings in 2026? at 0.01
Oct 20, 2026
- 08:45 PMJAjabalimeta$0.00
Sold 5.95 Yes for Will Ilia Topuria be the next fighter to be ranked first in the UFC Pound-For-Pound Rankings in 2026? at 0
Oct 19, 2026
- 05:46 AM0X0xfBd8C9C22cA76B3662d0e53A4f79719FDC684027-1779347618060$0.00
Sold 15 Yes for Will Arman Tsarukyan be the next fighter to be ranked first in the UFC Pound-For-Pound Rankings in 2026? at 0
- 02:30 AMSMsmallreceipt$0.00
Sold 0.51 Yes for Will Ilia Topuria be the next fighter to be ranked first in the UFC Pound-For-Pound Rankings in 2026? at 0
Oct 17, 2026
- 07:47 AMFEFelicityBright$0.19
Sold 3.1 No for Will Islam Makhachev remain #1 in the UFC Pound-For-Pound Rankings? at 0.06
Oct 16, 2026
- 12:23 AMSMsmarterstrat$1.20
Sold 20 No for Will Islam Makhachev remain #1 in the UFC Pound-For-Pound Rankings? at 0.06
- 12:22 AMHUhuy67$21.71
Bought 23.1 Yes for Will Islam Makhachev remain #1 in the UFC Pound-For-Pound Rankings? at 0.94
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "Who will be the next UFC Pound-For-Pound #1 in 2026?"?
As of the latest update, Islam/None in 2026 leads the field as the frontrunner with a 95.2% win probability, followed by Khamzat Chimaev at 2.4% and Alexander Volkanovski at 1.2%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $602.1K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Ilia Topuria as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 0.4% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 33.2% — an Expected Value gap of +32.8%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Islam/None in 2026. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 95.2%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 35.8%, a negative EV Gap of -59.4% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Merab Dvalishvili holds a positive EV Gap of +25.1%, and Max Holloway shows +21.6%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
