What will the next Muse model family be named?

$94.6K Vol
Jan 1, 2027
Active
Probability Trend
Muse Fire 9.0%
Muse Blaze 8.0%
Muse Flare 5.4%
Muse Watermelon 3.2%
Muse Flame 1.9%

Core Summary

According to the latest prediction market data for the query “What will the next Muse model family be named?”, traders have formed a strong consensus.

Currently, Muse Fire is dominating the market with an overwhelming 17.5% chance of winning. Muse Flame follows in second place at 15%, while Muse Watermelon sits in third with 11.5%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $94.6K, reflecting intense industry interest.

Breakdown of Competitive Tiers

To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:

🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader

  • Muse Fire (17.5%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Muse Fire is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 18¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $21.5K in volume.

🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers

  • Muse Flame (15%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Muse Flame maintains a 15% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 15¢.
  • Muse Watermelon (11.5%): Sitting in third place with a 11.5% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Muse Watermelon, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.

🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~56.1%)

Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:

  • Alternative Options: This includes Muse Flare (9.8%), Muse Nova (9.5%), and Muse Blaze (5.5%).
  • Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Muse Flare are still attracting notable interest.

Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard

The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:

RankPredicted OutcomeWin ProbabilityTrading VolumeBuy Yes (Cost)Buy No (Cost)
1Muse Fire17.5%$21.5K18¢83¢
2Muse Flame14.9%$13.8K15¢85¢
3Muse Watermelon11.5%$13.6K12¢89¢
4Muse Flare9.8%$17.2K10¢90¢
5Muse Nova9.5%$14.2K10¢91¢
6Muse Blaze5.5%$14.2K6¢95¢

Result Rules

This market will resolve according to the model family name of the next model Meta releases in a new model family, released by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.

A qualifying release is Meta's first publicly released model of a new model family. New versions, updates, modes, variants, or re-releases of models in existing families will not qualify.

Each listed option's family name is its name excluding "Muse". This market will resolve to the listed option whose family name, together with "Muse", appears in the qualifying model's official name, regardless of word order, capitalization, spacing, punctuation, or hyphenation, and regardless of accompanying modifiers such as version numbers, dates, or mode, size, or variant designations. A family name appearing only as part of a longer word will not count. If the official name contains the family names of multiple listed options, this market will resolve to the option that comes first in alphabetical order, exactly as listed in this market group.

This market will resolve to "Other" if no qualifying release occurs by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, if the qualifying model's official name does not include "Muse", contains no word other than "Muse" and such modifiers, or contains no listed option's family name.

The official name is the name under which the model is presented in Meta's primary launch announcement or, absent one, its model card. API identifiers, URL slugs, interface labels, and codenames will not be considered. Any subsequent renaming, cancellation, or reclassification will not affect resolution.

A qualifying model must be launched and publicly accessible, including via open beta or open rolling waitlist signups. A closed beta or any form of private access will not suffice. The release must either be clearly defined and publicly announced by Meta as accessible to the general public, or otherwise be made publicly accessible and explicitly labeled on the company's official website. Labeling errors, placeholder text, or version names displayed on the website that do not correspond to a model that is actually accessible to the general public will not qualify.

This market will resolve according to the first qualifying release. If multiple models are released on the same calendar date (ET), all will be considered; if only one qualifies, this market will resolve according to it. If multiple qualify, this market will resolve to the option that comes first in alphabetical order, exactly as listed in this market group.

The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from Meta, with additional verification from a consensus of credible reporting.

AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps

While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.

Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.

Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities

Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:

  • The Most Overvalued Outcome Muse Fire currently trades at 17.5%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 11.4%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -6.1%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
  • The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Muse Watermelon as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 11.5% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 21.3% — yielding an impressive +9.8% EV Gap.
MarketTrade ValueFair ValueEV Gap
Muse Fire17.5%11.3%-6.1%
Muse Flame14.9%8.9%-6.1%
Muse WatermelonBest EV11.5%21.3%+9.8%
Muse Flare9.8%7.6%-2.2%
Muse Nova9.5%7.1%-2.4%
Muse Blaze5.5%2.7%-2.8%

Trade Activities

Here is the trade activities for this event.

Oct 9, 2026

  • 07:53 AM
    YIyinian500W
    $4.50

    Bought 50 Yes for Will the next Muse model family be named Muse Fire? at 0.09

  • 07:53 AM
    KIKiernanMeister
    $775.62

    Sold 843.07 No for Will the next Muse model family be named Muse Fire? at 0.92

  • 07:49 AM
    SAsanliparaguay
    $3.00

    Sold 50 Yes for Will the next Muse model family be named Muse Blaze? at 0.06

  • 07:47 AM
    RARazuchiDISNEY
    $8.00

    Sold 100 Yes for Will the next Muse model family be named Muse Blaze? at 0.08

  • 07:35 AM
    DRDr.PNL
    $84.76

    Sold 93.14 No for Will the next Muse model family be named Muse Blaze? at 0.91

  • 07:33 AM
    CHchennw
    $184.17

    Sold 2630.94 Yes for Will the next Muse model family be named Muse Fire? at 0.07

  • 07:27 AM
    PPpppooooolllmmmk
    $2.46

    Sold 35.13 Yes for Will the next Muse model family be named Muse Blaze? at 0.07

  • 07:27 AM
    PPpppooooolllmmmk
    $10.00

    Sold 100 Yes for Will the next Muse model family be named Muse Blaze? at 0.1

  • 07:26 AM
    PPpppooooolllmmmk
    $5.00

    Sold 50 Yes for Will the next Muse model family be named Muse Blaze? at 0.1

  • 07:24 AM
    WAWarriorH
    $67.68

    Bought 72 No for Will the next Muse model family be named Muse Blaze? at 0.94

  • 07:24 AM
    PPpppooooolllmmmk
    $44.58

    Sold 636.87 Yes for Will the next Muse model family be named Muse Blaze? at 0.07

  • 07:24 AM
    0X0x0d3dbEA9C4707F50Bc4bDd4cfcB034CfaeDcaa93-1772305407452
    $1.20

    Sold 10 Yes for Will the next Muse model family be named Muse Blaze? at 0.12

Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event

A51
0xa5ef…2966
Event PnL
+$4,475.97
Volume
$7,308.97
Positions
NoNoNo+3
DC2
0xdc3E831cad
Event PnL
+$372.57
Volume
$3,605.96
Positions
YesYesYes+1
AR3
ArmageddonRewardsBilly
Event PnL
-$19.54
Volume
$2,582.46
Positions
NoNoNo+2
KI4
KimchiCapital
Event PnL
+$119.29
Volume
$1,954.85
Positions
NoNoNo+1
TR5
tradetosurvive1
Event PnL
-$86.11
Volume
$1,581.27
Positions
YesYesYes+2
VI6
vinii
Event PnL
+$54.85
Volume
$1,434.57
Positions
NoYesNo
AJ7
AJSV
Event PnL
+$34.60
Volume
$1,409.90
Positions
YesYesYes+3
AC8
ACara
Event PnL
-$121.52
Volume
$1,062.46
Positions
YesYes

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current market consensus on "What will the next Muse model family be named?"?

As of the latest update, Muse Fire leads the field as the frontrunner with a 17.5% win probability, followed by Muse Flame at 15% and Muse Watermelon at 11.5%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $94.6K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.

How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?

The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.

Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?

Our latest run flags Muse Watermelon as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 11.5% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 21.3% — an Expected Value gap of +9.8%, making it the premium value play in this pool.

Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?

Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Muse Fire. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 17.5%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 11.4%, a negative EV Gap of -6.1% that signals the contract is overpriced.

Get Started