UFC 331: Gable Steveson vs. Sean Sharaf (Heavyweight, Prelims)

$402K Vol
Jan 1, 1
Resolved
Probability Trend
Sean Sharaf 100.0%
Gable Steveson 0.1%

Core Summary

According to the latest prediction market data for the query “UFC 331: Gable Steveson vs. Sean Sharaf (Heavyweight, Prelims)”, traders have formed a strong consensus.

Currently, Ends before Round 3? is dominating the market with an overwhelming 88% chance of winning. Fight won by KO/TKO? follows in second place at 78.5%, while Steveson to win by KO/TKO? sits in third with 72%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $402K, reflecting intense industry interest.

Breakdown of Competitive Tiers

To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:

🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader

  • Ends before Round 3? (88%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Ends before Round 3? is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 88¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction.

🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers

  • Fight won by KO/TKO? (78.5%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Fight won by KO/TKO? maintains a 78.5% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 79¢.
  • Steveson to win by KO/TKO? (72%): Sitting in third place with a 72% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Steveson to win by KO/TKO?, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.

🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~0%)

Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:

  • Alternative Options: This includes Steveson in Round 1 (70.5%), Steveson in Round 2 (54%), and Fight won by submission? (16.5%).
  • Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Fight to Go the Distance? are still attracting notable interest.

Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard

The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:

RankPredicted OutcomeWin ProbabilityTrading VolumeBuy Yes (Cost)Buy No (Cost)
1Ends before Round 3?88.0%88¢12¢
2Fight won by KO/TKO?78.5%79¢22¢
3Steveson to win by KO/TKO?72.0%72¢28¢
4Steveson in Round 170.5%71¢30¢
5Steveson in Round 254.0%54¢46¢
6Fight won by submission?16.5%17¢84¢
7Fight to Go the Distance?8.5%92¢
8Fight won by decision?8.0%92¢

Result Rules

This market will resolve to "Gable Steveson" if Gable Steveson is officially declared the winner of the fight against Sean Sharaf at UFC 331: Van vs. Pantoja 2, scheduled for September 19, 2026.

It will resolve to "Sean Sharaf" if Sean Sharaf is officially declared the winner.

If the fight is declared a draw or technical draw, ruled a No Contest, not scored, canceled, or postponed beyond October 3, 2026, this market will resolve "50-50."

The resolution source for this market will be official information from the UFC.

AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps

While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.

Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.

Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities

Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:

  • The Most Overvalued Outcome Fight won by submission? currently trades at 16.5%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 1%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -15.5%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
  • The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Fight won by KO/TKO? as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 78.5% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 81.9% — yielding an impressive +3.4% EV Gap.
  • Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Steveson in Round 1 (EV Gap: +2.2%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
MarketTrade ValueFair ValueEV Gap
Ends before Round 3?88.0%86.6%-1.4%
Fight won by KO/TKO?Best EV78.5%81.9%+3.4%
Steveson to win by KO/TKO?72.0%70.3%-1.7%
Steveson in Round 170.5%72.7%+2.2%
Steveson in Round 254.0%44.2%-9.8%
Fight won by submission?16.5%1.0%-15.5%
Fight to Go the Distance?8.5%6.9%-1.6%
Fight won by decision?8.0%3.6%-4.4%

Trade Activities

Here is the trade activities for this event.

Sep 19, 2026

  • 08:51 PM
    CACabe
    $60.00

    Bought 64.516128 Gable Steveson for UFC 331: Gable Steveson vs. Sean Sharaf (Heavyweight, Prelims) at 0.93

  • 08:50 PM
    PIpiedra.
    $4.24

    Bought 53 Sean Sharaf for UFC 331: Gable Steveson vs. Sean Sharaf (Heavyweight, Prelims) at 0.08

  • 08:47 PM
    $39.00

    Bought 50 Under for O/U 1.5 Rounds at 0.78

  • 08:45 PM
    MOmoneymachine4
    $6.00

    Bought 50 No for Will the fight end before Round 3? at 0.12

  • 08:45 PM
    CLClawbangers
    $1,000.00

    Bought 1075.268814 Gable Steveson for UFC 331: Gable Steveson vs. Sean Sharaf (Heavyweight, Prelims) at 0.93

  • 08:43 PM
    STstrctr
    $955.02

    Bought 1026.9 Gable Steveson for UFC 331: Gable Steveson vs. Sean Sharaf (Heavyweight, Prelims) at 0.93

  • 08:43 PM
    $43.67

    Bought 55.98718 Under for O/U 1.5 Rounds at 0.78

  • 08:41 PM
    KAKaiMy
    $3.90

    Bought 5 Under for O/U 1.5 Rounds at 0.78

  • 08:40 PM
    GHghxst - 24725
    $2.00

    Bought 25 Sean Sharaf for UFC 331: Gable Steveson vs. Sean Sharaf (Heavyweight, Prelims) at 0.08

  • 08:38 PM
    0X0x37AbAbFFfD2E2FAB9De4B5a7d94d27e35E10B142-1775550724348
    $1.00

    Bought 1.075257 Gable Steveson for UFC 331: Gable Steveson vs. Sean Sharaf (Heavyweight, Prelims) at 0.93

  • 08:35 PM
    $21.00

    Bought 105 Yes for Will the fight be won by submission? at 0.2

  • 08:34 PM
    0X0x79Af6c69b46b0579e9217639Ba890009a9B5b720-1774897669407
    $5.00

    Bought 25 Yes for Will the fight be won by submission? at 0.2

Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event

NI1
nigiri99
Event PnL
+$107.58
Volume
$17,351.00
Positions
Sean Sharaf
VE2
VeryLucky888
Event PnL
-$19.78
Volume
$14,300.76
Positions
Gable StevesonUnderYes+1
WA3
WarewaPain
Event PnL
+$0.01
Volume
$9,088.59
Positions
Sean Sharaf
BE4
BejingOlympics
Event PnL
+$0.00
Volume
$7,331.29
Positions
Gable Steveson
KI5
kingflop
Event PnL
+$66.67
Volume
$7,268.16
Positions
Gable StevesonUnder
RO6
roscoff
Event PnL
+$27.46
Volume
$4,624.39
Positions
UnderNoNo+2
BI7
binkybarnes55
Event PnL
+$45.87
Volume
$3,058.08
Positions
Gable Steveson
DV8
dv-pm
Event PnL
-$57.70
Volume
$2,885.00
Positions
Gable Steveson

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current market consensus on "UFC 331: Gable Steveson vs. Sean Sharaf (Heavyweight, Prelims)"?

As of the latest update, Ends before Round 3? leads the field as the frontrunner with a 88% win probability, followed by Fight won by KO/TKO? at 78.5% and Steveson to win by KO/TKO? at 72%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $402K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.

How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?

The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.

Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?

Our latest run flags Fight won by KO/TKO? as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 78.5% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 81.9% — an Expected Value gap of +3.4%, making it the premium value play in this pool.

Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?

Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Fight won by submission?. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 16.5%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 1%, a negative EV Gap of -15.5% that signals the contract is overpriced.

Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?

Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Steveson in Round 1 holds a positive EV Gap of +2.2%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.

Get Started