
The Streamer Awards: Best Content Group
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “The Streamer Awards: Best Content Group”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, CORE is dominating the market with an overwhelming 96% chance of winning. Clooless follows in second place at 3.7%, while Fuslie, Squeex, Ludwig, Rae sits in third with 3%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $4.3K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- CORE (96%): Currently commanding the highest probability, CORE is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 96¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $2.5K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Clooless (3.7%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Clooless maintains a 3.7% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 4¢.
- Fuslie, Squeex, Ludwig, Rae (3%): Sitting in third place with a 3% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Fuslie, Squeex, Ludwig, Rae, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~0%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes AMP (2.5%), and QSMP (2.3%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like AMP are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CORE | 96.0% | $2.5K | 96¢ | 4¢ |
| 2 | Clooless | 3.7% | $767 | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 3 | Fuslie, Squeex, Ludwig, Rae | 3.0% | $137 | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 4 | AMP | 2.5% | $498 | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 5 | QSMP | 2.3% | $386 | 2¢ | 98¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve according to the content group that wins Best Content Group at the 2026 Streamer Awards, scheduled to be live streamed on Thursday, November 12, 2026 at 3:00 PM PT (6:00 PM ET) on Twitch and YouTube.
If, for any reason, no winner is declared by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Other".
In case of a tie for the winner, this market will resolve in favor of the content group whose listed title comes first in alphabetical order.
The primary resolution source for this market will be information from thestreamerawards.com or the official broadcast of the Streamer Awards on Twitch or YouTube; however, a consensus of credible information will also be used.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome CORE currently trades at 96%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 58.3%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -37.7%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| CORE | 96.0% | 58.3% | -37.7% |
| Clooless | 3.7% | 0.1% | -3.5% |
| Fuslie, Squeex, Ludwig, Rae | 3.0% | 0.1% | -2.9% |
| AMP | 2.5% | 0.6% | -1.9% |
| QSMP | 2.3% | 0.5% | -1.8% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Nov 12, 2026
- 10:05 AMXTxtxpleasecallme$1.87
Bought 23.375 No for Will CORE win Best Content Group at the 2026 Streamer Awards? at 0.08
- 10:01 AMANangelsanddemons$5.00
Bought 5.0555 No for Will Clooless win Best Content Group at the 2026 Streamer Awards? at 0.99
- 05:48 AMTHTheWindKnowsmyName$141.67
Bought 152.333328 Yes for Will CORE win Best Content Group at the 2026 Streamer Awards? at 0.93
- 05:05 AMJAjafacakee$0.05
Sold 5 Yes for Will QSMP win Best Content Group at the 2026 Streamer Awards? at 0.01
- 04:39 AMAUauros2$1.17
Bought 10.636364 No for Will CORE win Best Content Group at the 2026 Streamer Awards? at 0.11
- 12:13 AMI7i7d3v2$5.00
Bought 5.434775 Yes for Will CORE win Best Content Group at the 2026 Streamer Awards? at 0.92
- 12:05 AMAUauros2$131.43
Bought 142.858687 Yes for Will CORE win Best Content Group at the 2026 Streamer Awards? at 0.92
Nov 11, 2026
- 11:42 PMHFhfv$1.00
Sold 50 Yes for Will Clooless win Best Content Group at the 2026 Streamer Awards? at 0.02
- 11:40 PMCHchristmas-punch$5.00
Bought 5.434775 Yes for Will CORE win Best Content Group at the 2026 Streamer Awards? at 0.92
- 11:39 PMISIstaroth$0.00
Sold 0.04 Yes for Will AMP win Best Content Group at the 2026 Streamer Awards? at 0.03
- 11:39 PMISIstaroth$21.78
Bought 22.4536 No for Will AMP win Best Content Group at the 2026 Streamer Awards? at 0.97
- 11:39 PMTHTheWindKnowsmyName$0.68
Sold 22.5 Yes for Will AMP win Best Content Group at the 2026 Streamer Awards? at 0.03
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "The Streamer Awards: Best Content Group"?
As of the latest update, CORE leads the field as the frontrunner with a 96% win probability, followed by Clooless at 3.7% and Fuslie, Squeex, Ludwig, Rae at 3%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $4.3K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around CORE. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 96%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 58.3%, a negative EV Gap of -37.7% that signals the contract is overpriced.
