
Nobel Economics Prize Winner 2026
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Nobel Economics Prize Winner 2026”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Ariel Pakes is dominating the market with an overwhelming 20% chance of winning. Lawrence Katz follows in second place at 17.5%, while Michael Woodford sits in third with 11.5%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $84.9K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Ariel Pakes (20%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Ariel Pakes is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 20¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $15.7K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Lawrence Katz (17.5%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Lawrence Katz maintains a 17.5% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 18¢.
- Michael Woodford (11.5%): Sitting in third place with a 11.5% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Michael Woodford, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~51%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes Susan Athey (10.5%), David Autor (9%), and Richard Blundell (7.6%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Robert Barro are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ariel Pakes | 20.0% | $15.7K | 20¢ | 80¢ |
| 2 | Lawrence Katz | 17.5% | $4.7K | 18¢ | 83¢ |
| 3 | Michael Woodford | 11.5% | $2.4K | 12¢ | 89¢ |
| 4 | Susan Athey | 10.5% | $14.0K | 11¢ | 90¢ |
| 5 | David Autor | 9.0% | $2.5K | 9¢ | 91¢ |
| 6 | Richard Blundell | 7.5% | $7.6K | 8¢ | 92¢ |
| 7 | Robert Barro | 6.7% | $4.3K | 7¢ | 93¢ |
| 8 | Hal Varian | 6.5% | $1.4K | 7¢ | 94¢ |
| 9 | Ernst Fehr | 6.3% | $1.6K | 6¢ | 94¢ |
| 10 | Partha Dasgupta | 5.3% | $7.7K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 11 | Sidney Winter | 4.0% | $1.2K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 12 | Matthew Rabin | 2.2% | $3.6K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 13 | Luigi Zingales | 2.0% | $4.8K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 14 | Victor Chernozhukov | 1.6% | $905 | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 15 | Andreu Mas-Colell | 1.1% | $3.9K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 16 | Javier Milei | 0.7% | $6.7K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 17 | Demian Reidel | 0.6% | $1.8K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
Result Rules
The Nobel Prize in Economics is awarded annually by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. The 2026 Nobel Prize in Economics is scheduled to be announced on October 12, 2026, at 11:45 AM CEST (5:45 AM ET) at the earliest.
The Nobel Prize in Economics means the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the listed person is named a laureate of the 2026 Nobel Prize in Economics in the official announcement from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
The prize may be shared by up to three laureates. A listed person who shares the 2026 Nobel Prize in Economics will resolve to "Yes" regardless of how many other laureates are named alongside them.
If the 2026 Nobel Prize in Economics is withheld, is reserved for a later year, or has otherwise not been announced by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "No".
The primary resolution source for this market will be the official announcement from the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, published at https://www.nobelprize.org/; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Lawrence Katz currently trades at 17.5%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 5.8%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -11.7%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Richard Blundell as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 7.6% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 29.2% — yielding an impressive +21.7% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Demian Reidel (EV Gap: +17.5%) and Susan Athey (EV Gap: +12.7%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ariel Pakes | 20.0% | 21.4% | +1.4% |
| Lawrence Katz | 17.5% | 5.8% | -11.7% |
| Michael Woodford | 11.5% | 11.9% | +0.4% |
| Susan Athey | 10.5% | 23.2% | +12.7% |
| David Autor | 9.0% | 6.1% | -2.9% |
| Richard BlundellBest EV | 7.5% | 29.2% | +21.7% |
| Robert Barro | 6.7% | 9.4% | +2.7% |
| Hal Varian | 6.5% | 5.1% | -1.4% |
| Ernst Fehr | 6.3% | 6.8% | +0.4% |
| Partha Dasgupta | 5.3% | 5.7% | +0.4% |
| Sidney Winter | 4.0% | 7.9% | +3.9% |
| Matthew Rabin | 2.2% | 8.5% | +6.3% |
| Luigi Zingales | 2.0% | 4.7% | +2.7% |
| Victor Chernozhukov | 1.6% | 8.1% | +6.5% |
| Andreu Mas-Colell | 1.1% | 2.4% | +1.4% |
| Javier Milei | 0.7% | 5.9% | +5.2% |
| Demian Reidel | 0.6% | 18.1% | +17.5% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Oct 10, 2026
- 11:40 PMSLslobod$7.20
Sold 9 No for Will Ariel Pakes win the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2026? at 0.8
- 11:38 PMGFgfdgfvfvssdd$17.89
Bought 20.1 No for Will Lawrence Katz win the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2026? at 0.89
- 11:38 PMSLslobod$266.05
Bought 313 No for Will Lawrence Katz win the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2026? at 0.85
- 11:36 PMSLslobod$954.00
Sold 1060 No for Will Richard Blundell win the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2026? at 0.9
- 11:32 PMSLslobod$46.00
Sold 50 No for Will Richard Blundell win the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2026? at 0.92
- 11:15 PMEMEmethN1l2367$0.50
Sold 50 Yes for Will Sidney Winter win the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2026? at 0.01
- 09:57 PMWAWarriorH$49.50
Bought 50 No for Will Sidney Winter win the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2026? at 0.99
- 09:57 PMLOlongdated-poli$4.00
Sold 200 Yes for Will Sidney Winter win the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2026? at 0.02
- 09:57 PMVIViscaElBarca$4.00
Sold 200 Yes for Will Sidney Winter win the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2026? at 0.02
- 09:57 PMPRprivateaccount$512.77
Bought 528.63 No for Will Sidney Winter win the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2026? at 0.97
- 09:26 PMPRPragueSizeLord$2.00
Bought 16.666667 Yes for Will Michael Woodford win the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2026? at 0.12
- 09:23 PMPRPragueSizeLord$5.00
Bought 62.5 Yes for Will Hal Varian win the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2026? at 0.08
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "Nobel Economics Prize Winner 2026"?
As of the latest update, Ariel Pakes leads the field as the frontrunner with a 20% win probability, followed by Lawrence Katz at 17.5% and Michael Woodford at 11.5%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $84.9K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Richard Blundell as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 7.6% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 29.2% — an Expected Value gap of +21.7%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Lawrence Katz. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 17.5%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 5.8%, a negative EV Gap of -11.7% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Demian Reidel holds a positive EV Gap of +17.5%, and Susan Athey shows +12.7%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
