
Lions vs. Cardinals
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Lions vs. Cardinals”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Exact Margin: Tie is dominating the market with an overwhelming 39% chance of winning. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $94.7K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Exact Margin: Tie (39%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Exact Margin: Tie is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 39¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $33 in volume.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Exact Margin: Tie | 39.0% | $33 | 39¢ | 61¢ |
Result Rules
In the upcoming NFL football game between Lions and Cardinals, scheduled for October 11 at 4:25PM ET:
This market will resolve to "Lions" if Lions win the game.
This market will resolve to "Cardinals" if Cardinals win the game.
Overtime is included if played.
If the game ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50.
If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Exact Margin: Tie currently trades at 39%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 2%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -37%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exact Margin: Tie | 39.0% | 2.0% | -37.0% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Oct 9, 2026
- 05:37 AMAJAJSV$1.70
Bought 5 Cardinals for 2H Spread: Cardinals (-6.5) at 0.34
- 05:36 AMHAhawaiicj$28.00
Bought 40 Lions for Lions vs. Cardinals at 0.7
- 05:30 AM——$9.68
Bought 13.82857 Lions for Lions vs. Cardinals at 0.7
- 05:04 AMCHCharlieEcho71$2.94
Bought 4.2 Lions for Lions vs. Cardinals at 0.7
- 04:55 AMJDJDragon$10.00
Bought 17.24138 Under for Lions vs. Cardinals: O/U 56.5 at 0.58
- 04:54 AMJDJDragon$30.00
Bought 51.724138 Under for Lions vs. Cardinals: O/U 56.5 at 0.58
- 03:57 AMLOlostbuthaveam$1.86
Bought 6 Cardinals for Lions vs. Cardinals at 0.31
- 03:39 AMAJAJSV$1.70
Bought 5 Cardinals for 2H Spread: Cardinals (-2.5) at 0.34
- 02:31 AMLPlpcapital1$30.40
Bought 40 Lions for 2H Spread: Cardinals (-4.5) at 0.76
- 01:28 AMBUbubububblebutt$9.40
Bought 30.322581 Cardinals for Lions vs. Cardinals at 0.31
- 12:30 AMAYayybdot$12.72
Bought 18.17 Lions for Lions vs. Cardinals at 0.7
Oct 8, 2026
- 09:40 PM——$50.00
Bought 98.039216 Lions for Spread: Lions (-5.5) at 0.51
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "Lions vs. Cardinals"?
As of the latest update, Exact Margin: Tie leads the field as the frontrunner with a 39% win probability. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $94.7K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Exact Margin: Tie. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 39%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 2%, a negative EV Gap of -37% that signals the contract is overpriced.
