
MLB: NL Platinum Glove Winner
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “MLB: NL Platinum Glove Winner”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Pete Crow-Armstrong is dominating the market with an overwhelming 88.1% chance of winning. Jared Triolo follows in second place at 2.3%, while Gabriel Moreno sits in third with 0.7%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $1.2M, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Pete Crow-Armstrong (88.1%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Pete Crow-Armstrong is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 88¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $9.8K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Jared Triolo (2.3%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Jared Triolo maintains a 2.3% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 2¢.
- Gabriel Moreno (0.7%): Sitting in third place with a 0.7% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Gabriel Moreno, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~9%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes Matt Chapman (0.7%), Patrick Bailey (0.6%), and Ezequiel Tovar (0.4%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Christian Walker are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pete Crow-Armstrong | 88.0% | $9.8K | 88¢ | 12¢ |
| 2 | Jared Triolo | 2.3% | $1.8K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 3 | Gabriel Moreno | 0.7% | $1.3K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 4 | Matt Chapman | 0.7% | $1.1K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 5 | Patrick Bailey | 0.6% | $865.1K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 6 | Ezequiel Tovar | 0.4% | $785 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 7 | Christian Walker | 0.3% | $1.7K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 8 | Ke'Bryan Hayes | 0.1% | $879 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 9 | Matt Olson | 0.1% | $283.0K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 10 | Nico Hoerner | 0.1% | $1.1K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 11 | Dansby Swanson | 0.1% | $656 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 12 | Ian Happ | 0.1% | $554 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 13 | Brenton Doyle | 0.1% | $790 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 14 | Fernando Tatis Jr. | 0.1% | $1.0K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 15 | Ha-Seong Kim | 0.1% | $780 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 16 | Brice Turang | 0.1% | $584 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 17 | Sal Frelick | 0.1% | $682 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 18 | Masyn Winn | 0.1% | $875 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 19 | Javier Sanoja | 0.1% | $885 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 20 | Andy Pages | 0.1% | $262 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 21 | JJ Wetherholt | 0.1% | $1.1K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 22 | Max Muncy | 0.1% | $268 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve to the player who wins the 2026 National League Platinum Glove award for the 2026 MLB Season.
In the event of a tie, this market will resolve according to the official winner as determined by MLB rules. If multiple winners are announced then this market will resolve to the player whose listed last name comes first alphabetically.
If the 2026 MLB season is cancelled, postponed after December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, or there is otherwise no winner declared within that timeframe, this market will resolve to “Other”.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from Major League Baseball; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Pete Crow-Armstrong currently trades at 88.1%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 69.2%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -18.8%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Ha-Seong Kim as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 0.1% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 14.7% — yielding an impressive +14.6% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Masyn Winn (EV Gap: +13.8%) and Ian Happ (EV Gap: +12.6%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Crow-Armstrong | 88.0% | 69.2% | -18.8% |
| Jared Triolo | 2.3% | 8.2% | +5.9% |
| Gabriel Moreno | 0.7% | 10.0% | +9.3% |
| Matt Chapman | 0.7% | 11.8% | +11.1% |
| Patrick Bailey | 0.6% | 4.1% | +3.5% |
| Ezequiel Tovar | 0.4% | 3.8% | +3.4% |
| Christian Walker | 0.3% | 8.1% | +7.8% |
| Ke'Bryan Hayes | 0.1% | 0.1% | -0.1% |
| Matt Olson | 0.1% | 11.6% | +11.4% |
| Nico Hoerner | 0.1% | 6.7% | +6.6% |
| Dansby Swanson | 0.1% | 4.6% | +4.5% |
| Ian Happ | 0.1% | 12.7% | +12.6% |
| Brenton Doyle | 0.1% | 4.1% | +4.0% |
| Fernando Tatis Jr. | 0.1% | 4.5% | +4.5% |
| Ha-Seong KimBest EV | 0.1% | 14.7% | +14.6% |
| Brice Turang | 0.1% | 4.6% | +4.5% |
| Sal Frelick | 0.1% | 5.1% | +5.1% |
| Masyn Winn | 0.1% | 13.8% | +13.8% |
| Javier Sanoja | 0.1% | 10.4% | +10.4% |
| Andy Pages | 0.1% | 5.9% | +5.8% |
| JJ Wetherholt | 0.1% | 4.6% | +4.5% |
| Max Muncy | 0.1% | 5.9% | +5.8% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Sep 6, 2026
- 05:21 PMDRDr.PNL$43.31
Sold 49.22 Yes for Will Pete Crow-Armstrong win the 2026 NL Platinum Glove award? at 0.88
Sep 3, 2026
- 07:13 AMRIrichyee$25.52
Sold 29 Yes for Will Pete Crow-Armstrong win the 2026 NL Platinum Glove award? at 0.88
- 07:08 AMRIrichyee$18.09
Sold 20.1 Yes for Will Pete Crow-Armstrong win the 2026 NL Platinum Glove award? at 0.9
- 07:03 AMSDsdfsdfsdfsdf2$9.10
Sold 10 Yes for Will Pete Crow-Armstrong win the 2026 NL Platinum Glove award? at 0.91
- 07:02 AMSDsdfsdfsdfsdf2$18.20
Sold 20 Yes for Will Pete Crow-Armstrong win the 2026 NL Platinum Glove award? at 0.91
- 07:02 AMSDsdfsdfsdfsdf2$18.20
Sold 20 Yes for Will Pete Crow-Armstrong win the 2026 NL Platinum Glove award? at 0.91
- 07:02 AMSDsdfsdfsdfsdf2$18.20
Sold 20 Yes for Will Pete Crow-Armstrong win the 2026 NL Platinum Glove award? at 0.91
- 07:02 AMSDsdfsdfsdfsdf2$74.38
Sold 79.98 Yes for Will Pete Crow-Armstrong win the 2026 NL Platinum Glove award? at 0.93
- 07:02 AMWOworeste$13.24
Bought 189.11 No for Will Pete Crow-Armstrong win the 2026 NL Platinum Glove award? at 0.07
Sep 2, 2026
- 04:40 PMNEneutralwave23$4.73
Sold 4.73 No for Will Matt Olson win the 2026 NL Platinum Glove award? at 1
- 04:39 PMNEneutralwave23$4.73
Bought 4.734 No for Will Matt Olson win the 2026 NL Platinum Glove award? at 1
- 03:00 PMRIrichyee$1.20
Sold 20 No for Will Pete Crow-Armstrong win the 2026 NL Platinum Glove award? at 0.06
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "MLB: NL Platinum Glove Winner"?
As of the latest update, Pete Crow-Armstrong leads the field as the frontrunner with a 88.1% win probability, followed by Jared Triolo at 2.3% and Gabriel Moreno at 0.7%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $1.2M, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Ha-Seong Kim as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 0.1% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 14.7% — an Expected Value gap of +14.6%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Pete Crow-Armstrong. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 88.1%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 69.2%, a negative EV Gap of -18.8% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Masyn Winn holds a positive EV Gap of +13.8%, and Ian Happ shows +12.6%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
