
MI-04 House Election Winner
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “MI-04 House Election Winner”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Sean McCann (D) is dominating the market with an overwhelming 72% chance of winning. Bill Huizenga (R) follows in second place at 14.5%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $102.9K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Sean McCann (D) (72%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Sean McCann (D) is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 72¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $41.4K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Bill Huizenga (R) (14.5%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Bill Huizenga (R) maintains a 14.5% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 14¢.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sean McCann (D) | 72.0% | $41.4K | 72¢ | 28¢ |
| 2 | Bill Huizenga (R) | 14.5% | $61.9K | 14¢ | 86¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve according to the party of the candidate who wins the MI-04 congressional district seat in the U.S. House of Representatives in the 2026 midterm elections. The midterm elections will take place on November 3, 2026.
A candidate's party will be determined by their ballot-listed or otherwise identifiable affiliation with that party at the time all of the 2026 House elections are conclusively called by this market's resolution sources. A candidate without a ballot-listed affiliation to either the Democrat or Republican parties will be considered a member of one of these parties based on the party with which they most recently expressed their intent to caucus at the time all of the House elections are conclusively called by this market's resolution sources.
This market will resolve based on the result of the election as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results as reported by the United States government, specifically the Federal Election Commission (https://www.fec.gov/).
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Sean McCann (D) currently trades at 72%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 53.2%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -18.8%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Bill Huizenga (R) as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 14.5% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 32.1% — yielding an impressive +17.6% EV Gap.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sean McCann (D) | 72.0% | 53.2% | -18.8% |
| Bill Huizenga (R)Best EV | 14.5% | 32.1% | +17.6% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Nov 4, 2026
- 08:27 AMMEmelonmanm$9.50
Bought 95 No for Will the Democratic Party win the MI-04 House seat? at 0.1
- 08:27 AMCBCb94C437EA5e6f088c6c0C143c592ab8EFBed$4.50
Bought 5 Yes for Will the Democratic Party win the MI-04 House seat? at 0.9
- 08:27 AMCBCb94C437EA5e6f088c6c0C143c592ab8EFBed$36.40
Sold 40 No for Will the Republican Party win the MI-04 House seat? at 0.91
- 08:22 AMCBCb94C437EA5e6f088c6c0C143c592ab8EFBed$45.50
Bought 50 Yes for Will the Democratic Party win the MI-04 House seat? at 0.91
- 08:22 AM0X0x1F85EB9C455c5BDEF5D96C2739076678c7157B02-1778811447702$1.92
Bought 16 No for Will the Democratic Party win the MI-04 House seat? at 0.12
- 08:22 AMBAbananabreakfast$71.20
Bought 80 Yes for Will the Democratic Party win the MI-04 House seat? at 0.89
- 08:22 AMAJAJSV2$1.80
Bought 15 No for Will the Democratic Party win the MI-04 House seat? at 0.12
- 08:22 AM——$8.58
Bought 78 No for Will the Democratic Party win the MI-04 House seat? at 0.11
- 08:22 AMBAbananabreakfast$403.68
Bought 448.53 Yes for Will the Democratic Party win the MI-04 House seat? at 0.9
- 08:22 AMV3v38$1,958.18
Bought 2225.21 Yes for Will the Democratic Party win the MI-04 House seat? at 0.88
- 08:22 AM0X0xD71776A8d4FdDeb3c150C4607B3f8bec31213B85-1778810464493$99.80
Bought 114.71 No for Will the Republican Party win the MI-04 House seat? at 0.87
- 08:22 AM0X0x4f1a1eae1Ba4CB2A7D2950b45c3C88Db9dFe0613-1763367176943$65.25
Bought 75 No for Will the Republican Party win the MI-04 House seat? at 0.87
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "MI-04 House Election Winner"?
As of the latest update, Sean McCann (D) leads the field as the frontrunner with a 72% win probability, followed by Bill Huizenga (R) at 14.5%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $102.9K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Bill Huizenga (R) as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 14.5% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 32.1% — an Expected Value gap of +17.6%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Sean McCann (D). The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 72%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 53.2%, a negative EV Gap of -18.8% that signals the contract is overpriced.
