Athletic Club vs. Elche CF - More Markets

$420K Vol
Sep 12, 2026
Active
Probability Trend
Elche CF 54.5%
Athletic Club 45.5%

Core Summary

According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Athletic Club vs. Elche CF - More Markets”, traders have formed a strong consensus.

Currently, Both Teams to Score is dominating the market with an overwhelming 50.5% chance of winning. Both Teams to Score in First Half follows in second place at 18.5%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $420K, reflecting intense industry interest.

Breakdown of Competitive Tiers

To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:

🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader

  • Both Teams to Score (50.5%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Both Teams to Score is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 51¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $11.3K in volume.

🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers

  • Both Teams to Score in First Half (18.5%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Both Teams to Score in First Half maintains a 18.5% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 19¢.

Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard

The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:

RankPredicted OutcomeWin ProbabilityTrading VolumeBuy Yes (Cost)Buy No (Cost)
1Both Teams to Score50.5%$11.3K51¢50¢
2Both Teams to Score in First Half18.5%$67419¢82¢

Result Rules

More markets for the La Liga game, scheduled for September 12 at 12:30 PM ET.

AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps

While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.

Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.

Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities

Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:

  • The Most Overvalued Outcome Both Teams to Score in First Half currently trades at 18.5%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 6.9%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -11.6%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
MarketTrade ValueFair ValueEV Gap
Both Teams to Score50.5%49.7%-0.8%
Both Teams to Score in First Half18.5%6.9%-11.6%

Trade Activities

Here is the trade activities for this event.

Sep 12, 2026

  • 09:15 AM
    SUsuntori
    $9.52

    Bought 16.413792 Over for Athletic Club vs. Elche CF: O/U 2.5 at 0.58

  • 09:08 AM
    VDvdsgsdfgb
    $200.00

    Bought 454.545455 Athletic Club for Spread: Athletic Club (-1.5) at 0.44

  • 08:53 AM
    SUsuntori
    $5.02

    Bought 7.61 Under for Athletic Club vs. Elche CF: O/U 3.5 at 0.66

  • 08:48 AM
    $10.00

    Bought 11.11111 Over for Athletic Club vs. Elche CF: Athletic Club O/U 0.5 at 0.9

  • 08:34 AM
    0X0xc77490B3dD308ca2dA51D5447732818c22c42777-1772207635412
    $10.00

    Bought 12.345678 Over for Athletic Club vs. Elche CF: O/U 1.5 at 0.81

  • 08:27 AM
    GPGptball
    $78.60

    Bought 135.517242 Over for Athletic Club vs. Elche CF: O/U 2.5 at 0.58

  • 08:26 AM
    SAsampani24
    $500.00

    Bought 2777.777778 Over for Athletic Club vs. Elche CF: O/U 4.5 at 0.18

  • 08:25 AM
    16168888888168
    $3.45

    Bought 5.22 Under for Athletic Club vs. Elche CF: O/U 3.5 at 0.66

  • 08:25 AM
    SAsampani24
    $1,000.00

    Bought 2857.142858 Over for Athletic Club vs. Elche CF: O/U 3.5 at 0.35

  • 08:25 AM
    16168888888168
    $2.25

    Bought 5.24 Under for Athletic Club vs. Elche CF: O/U 2.5 at 0.43

  • 08:24 AM
    SAsampani24
    $3,000.00

    Bought 5172.413792 Over for Athletic Club vs. Elche CF: O/U 2.5 at 0.58

  • 07:08 AM
    OLOlsaO
    $20.90

    Bought 22 Over for Athletic Club vs. Elche CF: O/U 0.5 at 0.95

Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event

SA1
sampani24
Event PnL
-$54.03
Volume
$10,807.33
Positions
OverOverOver
FL2
Flaznorp
Event PnL
-$23.79
Volume
$6,217.64
Positions
Elche CFUnderUnder+11
JA3
JAMJAMJAM4
Event PnL
-$17.55
Volume
$3,510.00
Positions
Elche CF
VE4
VeryLucky888
Event PnL
+$16.32
Volume
$3,032.03
Positions
UnderOverUnder
GO5
GoalLineGhost
Event PnL
+$11.64
Volume
$2,253.05
Positions
UnderOver
DV6
dv-pm
Event PnL
+$12.63
Volume
$2,206.75
Positions
Athletic ClubOverOver
A67
0xa697…6031
Event PnL
+$6.80
Volume
$1,360.58
Positions
Elche CFUnder
228
0x228B…4872
Event PnL
+$175.00
Volume
$999.99
Positions
Athletic Club

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current market consensus on "Athletic Club vs. Elche CF - More Markets"?

As of the latest update, Both Teams to Score leads the field as the frontrunner with a 50.5% win probability, followed by Both Teams to Score in First Half at 18.5%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $420K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.

How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?

The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.

Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?

Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Both Teams to Score in First Half. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 18.5%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 6.9%, a negative EV Gap of -11.6% that signals the contract is overpriced.

Get Started