
Israeli Legislative Election Winner
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Israeli Legislative Election Winner”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Likud is dominating the market with an overwhelming 64% chance of winning. Yashar follows in second place at 30%, while Together sits in third with 29%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $261.2K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Likud (64%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Likud is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 64¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $118.1K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Yashar (30%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Yashar maintains a 30% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 30¢.
- Together (29%): Sitting in third place with a 29% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Together, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~0%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes Shas (0.3%), The Democrats (0.3%), and Otzma Yehudit (0.3%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Shas are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Likud | 64.0% | $118.1K | 64¢ | 36¢ |
| 2 | Yashar | 30.0% | $65.6K | 30¢ | 70¢ |
| 3 | Together | 29.0% | $44.0K | 29¢ | 71¢ |
| 4 | Shas | 0.3% | $9.8K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 5 | The Democrats | 0.3% | $10.3K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 6 | Otzma Yehudit | 0.3% | $13.5K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
Result Rules
Legislative elections are expected to be held in Israel on October 27, 2026.
This market will resolve according to the political party or coalition that wins the greatest number of seats in the Israeli Knesset as a result of this election.
If the results of this election are not definitively known by June 30, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Other".
In the event of a tie between multiple parties or coalitions for the most seats won, this market will resolve in favor of the party or coalition whose candidate list received a greater number of valid votes. In the event that results in a tie, this market will resolve in favor of the party whose listed name appears first in alphabetical order.
This market's resolution will be based solely on the number of seats won by the named party or coalition in the Israeli Knesset.
This market will resolve based on the election results, as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results as reported by Israel’s Central Election Committee (Va'adet HaBehirot HaMerkazit) (https://www.gov.il/en/departments/central-elections-committee/govil-landing-page).
The following rules govern the merging, joint contention, and splitting of listed parties:
- If Likud or Together (or any successor party created through a merger) merge or contest the election jointly with any other party, the option corresponding to Likud or Together will represent the resultant candidate list or merged party.
Otherwise:
- If a listed party merges with, or contests the election as part of a joint candidate list with, one or more unlisted parties prior to the election, the option corresponding to the listed party will represent all seats won by the merged party or joint candidate list. If a listed party merges with, or contests the election as part of a joint candidate list with, one or more other listed parties prior to the election, the option corresponding to the party which held the most seats in the prior Knesset will represent all seats won by the merged party/joint candidate list. If these rules do not adequately determine which option represents a merged party or joint candidate list, the listed party whose name, as listed in this market, comes first in alphabetical order, will represent all seats won by the merged party or joint candidate list.
- If a listed party splits into multiple parties prior to the election, the option corresponding to the listed party will represent the resulting party that holds the greatest number of seats in the Israeli Knesset as a result of the split. If these rules do not adequately determine which party represents a listed option after a split, the listed option will represent all seats won by the party resulting from the split whose primary English name comes first in alphabetical order.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Likud currently trades at 64%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 31.7%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -32.3%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Shas as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 0.3% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 11.3% — yielding an impressive +11.1% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Otzma Yehudit (EV Gap: +8.4%) and The Democrats (EV Gap: +8.4%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likud | 64.0% | 31.7% | -32.3% |
| Yashar | 30.0% | 32.9% | +2.9% |
| Together | 29.0% | 23.4% | -5.6% |
| ShasBest EV | 0.3% | 11.3% | +11.1% |
| The Democrats | 0.3% | 8.7% | +8.4% |
| Otzma Yehudit | 0.3% | 8.7% | +8.4% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Sep 8, 2026
- 07:00 AMSPSpringlyFawl$0.54
Sold 27 Yes for Will Together win the most seats in the 2026 Israeli legislative election? at 0.02
- 07:00 AM——$2.37
Sold 4.56 No for Will Likud win the most seats in the 2026 Israeli legislative election? at 0.52
- 06:54 AMKOkorda77$10.60
Bought 20 No for Will Likud win the most seats in the 2026 Israeli legislative election? at 0.53
- 06:54 AMKOkorda77$19.60
Bought 20 No for Will Together win the most seats in the 2026 Israeli legislative election? at 0.98
- 06:54 AM——$11.61
Sold 24.19 No for Will Yashar win the most seats in the 2026 Israeli legislative election? at 0.48
- 05:34 AM0X0xee328A5aD8C6681fEE49316897ba2b90624B046C-1774548775517$44.11
Bought 88.22 Yes for Will Yashar win the most seats in the 2026 Israeli legislative election? at 0.5
- 03:36 AM0X0xee328A5aD8C6681fEE49316897ba2b90624B046C-1774548775517$45.91
Bought 93.7 Yes for Will Yashar win the most seats in the 2026 Israeli legislative election? at 0.49
- 02:35 AMTOtomonyc$0.17
Sold 0.35 Yes for Will Yashar win the most seats in the 2026 Israeli legislative election? at 0.48
- 02:34 AMTOtomonyc$36.96
Sold 77 Yes for Will Yashar win the most seats in the 2026 Israeli legislative election? at 0.48
Sep 7, 2026
- 10:20 PMGLGlicha$75.21
Sold 156.68 Yes for Will Likud win the most seats in the 2026 Israeli legislative election? at 0.48
- 09:28 PMDEDevstral$30.00
Bought 61.22 Yes for Will Yashar win the most seats in the 2026 Israeli legislative election? at 0.49
- 08:22 PM——$2.68
Bought 5.153847 No for Will Likud win the most seats in the 2026 Israeli legislative election? at 0.52
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "Israeli Legislative Election Winner"?
As of the latest update, Likud leads the field as the frontrunner with a 64% win probability, followed by Yashar at 30% and Together at 29%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $261.2K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Shas as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 0.3% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 11.3% — an Expected Value gap of +11.1%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Likud. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 64%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 31.7%, a negative EV Gap of -32.3% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Otzma Yehudit holds a positive EV Gap of +8.4%, and The Democrats shows +8.4%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
