
First to hit $1B FDV: ANSEM, CASHCAT, AI, or NET?
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “First to hit $1B FDV: ANSEM, CASHCAT, AI, or NET?”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, None by December 25, 2026 is dominating the market with an overwhelming 87.5% chance of winning. Cash Cat (CASHCAT) follows in second place at 5.5%, while Artificial Inu (AI) sits in third with 4.5%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $73.7K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- None by December 25, 2026 (87.5%): Currently commanding the highest probability, None by December 25, 2026 is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 88¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $10.1K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Cash Cat (CASHCAT) (5.5%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Cash Cat (CASHCAT) maintains a 5.5% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 6¢.
- Artificial Inu (AI) (4.5%): Sitting in third place with a 4.5% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Artificial Inu (AI), treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~2.5%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes The Black Bull (ANSEM) (3.1%), and NetNet (NET) (1.5%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like The Black Bull (ANSEM) are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | None by December 25, 2026 | 87.5% | $10.1K | 88¢ | 13¢ |
| 2 | Cash Cat (CASHCAT) | 5.5% | $10.4K | 6¢ | 95¢ |
| 3 | Artificial Inu (AI) | 4.5% | $16.7K | 5¢ | 96¢ |
| 4 | The Black Bull (ANSEM) | 3.0% | $19.4K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 5 | NetNet (NET) | 1.5% | $17.1K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
Result Rules
This event will resolve to the first of the coins listed below to reach a fully diluted valuation equal to or greater than $1,000,000,000 at any point between the creation of this event and December 25, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. If no coin listed below reaches a fully diluted valuation of $1,000,000,000 or greater by that time, this event will resolve to "None".
Fully diluted valuation refers to the figure published by each coin's resolution source, shown as "Fully Diluted Valuation" on CoinGecko and as "FDV" on CoinMarketCap. Circulating supply market cap will not be used.
The coins in this event, and their resolution sources, are:
- Cash Cat (CASHCAT), Robinhood Chain 0x020bfc650a365f8bb26819deaabf3e21291018b4, CoinGecko, https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/cash-cat
- Artificial Inu (AI), Robinhood Chain 0x2E8c31162b855A2ffa90F6F8634643Ad6F111e18, CoinMarketCap, https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/artificial-inu-ai/
- The Black Bull (ANSEM), Solana 9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump, CoinGecko, https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/the-black-bull
- NetNet (NET), Robinhood Chain 0xca9c78dd337a67f6e0077f65f5e9218719d30edf, CoinGecko, https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/netnet
A coin reaches the threshold at the first moment its fully diluted valuation, as displayed on its resolution source, is equal to or greater than $1,000,000,000. If two or more coins first reach the threshold within the same minute, the coin with the higher fully diluted valuation at that minute will be treated as first.
A momentary crossing qualifies, provided it is verifiable from the resolution source or from a consensus of credible reporting.
Each coin is judged solely against the source listed for it. Differences in methodology between CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap will not be adjusted for.
The primary resolution source for this event will be the source listed above for each coin; however, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used. If a resolution source becomes permanently unavailable or stops publishing data for a coin, that coin will resolve based on other credible and publicly verifiable sources.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome None by December 25, 2026 currently trades at 87.5%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 81.8%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -5.7%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Cash Cat (CASHCAT) as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 5.5% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 33.1% — yielding an impressive +27.6% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Artificial Inu (AI) (EV Gap: +2.7%) and NetNet (NET) (EV Gap: +0.5%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| None by December 25, 2026 | 87.5% | 81.8% | -5.7% |
| Cash Cat (CASHCAT)Best EV | 5.5% | 33.1% | +27.6% |
| Artificial Inu (AI) | 4.5% | 7.2% | +2.7% |
| The Black Bull (ANSEM) | 3.0% | 3.5% | +0.5% |
| NetNet (NET) | 1.5% | 1.9% | +0.5% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Sep 11, 2026
- 09:45 AMDOdoyou$30.00
Bought 500 Yes for Will Cash Cat be the first to hit a $1B FDV? at 0.06
- 09:07 AMBEBelaZuchi$1.98
Sold 99 Yes for Will ANSEM be the first to hit a $1B FDV? at 0.02
- 09:07 AMRARazuchiONE$2.00
Sold 100 Yes for Will ANSEM be the first to hit a $1B FDV? at 0.02
- 08:44 AMLOlolzzzlol$1.67
Sold 33.33 Yes for Will Cash Cat be the first to hit a $1B FDV? at 0.05
- 08:44 AM——$0.83
Sold 16.66 Yes for Will Cash Cat be the first to hit a $1B FDV? at 0.05
- 08:43 AM——$1.00
Bought 16.666667 Yes for Will Cash Cat be the first to hit a $1B FDV? at 0.06
- 08:28 AMPApalochka$4.17
Sold 4.91 Yes for Will none of these coins hit a $1B FDV? at 0.85
- 08:27 AMLOlolzzzlol$1.00
Sold 50 Yes for Will ANSEM be the first to hit a $1B FDV? at 0.02
- 08:20 AMSHshoobadooba18$0.17
Sold 8.73 Yes for Will ANSEM be the first to hit a $1B FDV? at 0.02
- 08:20 AMSHshoobadooba18$9.80
Bought 10 No for Will ANSEM be the first to hit a $1B FDV? at 0.98
- 08:20 AM1B1BTCis1BTC$1.00
Sold 50 Yes for Will ANSEM be the first to hit a $1B FDV? at 0.02
- 08:19 AM1B1BTCis1BTC$7.50
Sold 150 Yes for Will Cash Cat be the first to hit a $1B FDV? at 0.05
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "First to hit $1B FDV: ANSEM, CASHCAT, AI, or NET?"?
As of the latest update, None by December 25, 2026 leads the field as the frontrunner with a 87.5% win probability, followed by Cash Cat (CASHCAT) at 5.5% and Artificial Inu (AI) at 4.5%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $73.7K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Cash Cat (CASHCAT) as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 5.5% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 33.1% — an Expected Value gap of +27.6%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around None by December 25, 2026. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 87.5%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 81.8%, a negative EV Gap of -5.7% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Artificial Inu (AI) holds a positive EV Gap of +2.7%, and NetNet (NET) shows +0.5%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
