Chelsea FC vs. Hull City AFC - Exact Score

According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Chelsea FC vs. Hull City AFC - Exact Score”, traders have formed a strong consensus.

Currently, Any Other Score is dominating the market with an overwhelming 38.5% chance of winning. Chelsea FC 2 - 2 Hull City AFC follows in second place at 27.3%, while Chelsea FC 3 - 2 Hull City AFC sits in third with 20.3%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $230.7K, reflecting intense industry interest.

To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:

🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader

• Any Other Score (38.5%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Any Other Score is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 39¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $662 in volume.

🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers

• Chelsea FC 2 - 2 Hull City AFC (27.3%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Chelsea FC 2 - 2 Hull City AFC maintains a 27.3% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 27¢.
• Chelsea FC 3 - 2 Hull City AFC (20.3%): Sitting in third place with a 20.3% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Chelsea FC 3 - 2 Hull City AFC, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.

🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~13.9%)

Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:

• Alternative Options: This includes Chelsea FC 1 - 2 Hull City AFC (19%), Chelsea FC 2 - 3 Hull City AFC (7.2%), and Chelsea FC 1 - 3 Hull City AFC (6.1%).
• Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Chelsea FC 3 - 3 Hull City AFC are still attracting notable interest.

In the upcoming Premier League game between Chelsea FC and Hull City AFC, scheduled for September 12, 2026 at 10:00 AM ET: This market will resolve based on the final score of the Chelsea FC vs. Hull City AFC match originally scheduled for September 12, 2026 at 10:00 AM ET, considering only the result at the end of 90 minutes of regulation plus stoppage time; extra time and penalty shoot-outs are excluded. If the actual score is not one of the explicitly listed outcomes, the market resolves to "Any Other Score." If the match is postponed, the market will remain open until it is completed; if it is canceled with no make-up game, the market resolves to "0-0." The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, data from Flashscore may be used; if Flashscore data is unavailable, data from Sofascore may be used; if neither is available, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead. All markets will settle based on the official final result as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. Revisions to officially declared final scores made after market resolution will not be accounted for in determining the outcome.

While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.

Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.

Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities

Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:

• The Most Overvalued Outcome Chelsea FC 2 - 2 Hull City AFC currently trades at 27.3%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 3.3%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -24%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
• The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Chelsea FC 2 - 0 Hull City AFC as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 0.1% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 11.9% — yielding an impressive +11.9% EV Gap.
• Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Chelsea FC 2 - 1 Hull City AFC (EV Gap: +10.3%) and Chelsea FC 3 - 0 Hull City AFC (EV Gap: +10.1%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.