West Ham United FC vs. Wrexham AFC - More Markets

$91.4K Vol
Sep 11, 2026
Active
Probability Trend
Wrexham AFC 62.5%
West Ham United FC 37.5%

Core Summary

According to the latest prediction market data for the query “West Ham United FC vs. Wrexham AFC - More Markets”, traders have formed a strong consensus.

Currently, Both Teams to Score is dominating the market with an overwhelming 56% chance of winning. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $91.4K, reflecting intense industry interest.

Breakdown of Competitive Tiers

To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:

🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader

  • Both Teams to Score (56%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Both Teams to Score is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 56¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $1.2K in volume.

Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard

The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:

RankPredicted OutcomeWin ProbabilityTrading VolumeBuy Yes (Cost)Buy No (Cost)
1Both Teams to Score56.0%$1.2K56¢44¢

Result Rules

More markets for the EFL Championship game, scheduled for September 11 at 3:00 PM ET.

AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps

While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.

Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.

Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities

Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:

  • The Most Overvalued Outcome Both Teams to Score currently trades at 56%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 54%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -2%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
MarketTrade ValueFair ValueEV Gap
Both Teams to Score56.0%54.0%-2.0%

Trade Activities

Here is the trade activities for this event.

Sep 11, 2026

  • 08:49 AM
    JAJAMJAMJAM4
    $281.58

    Bought 494 Over for West Ham United FC vs. Wrexham AFC: O/U 2.5 at 0.57

  • 08:20 AM
    NINikitka
    $786.33

    Bought 2246.67 West Ham United FC for Spread: West Ham United FC (-1.5) at 0.35

  • 08:01 AM
    0X0xca0c6d9b7A2C0cB9582591Cd2D8ff42D5674b9B6-1751220806251
    $4.65

    Bought 5 Under for West Ham United FC vs. Wrexham AFC: O/U 5.5 at 0.93

  • 07:33 AM
    0X0xB52f7fF99a6476DFabD3dE0689aAA2fF0fCEF3a8-1783350736219
    $1.00

    Bought 1.754386 Over for West Ham United FC vs. Wrexham AFC: O/U 2.5 at 0.57

  • 07:33 AM
    0X0xB52f7fF99a6476DFabD3dE0689aAA2fF0fCEF3a8-1783350736219
    $1.00

    Bought 1.785715 Yes for West Ham United FC vs. Wrexham AFC: Both Teams to Score at 0.56

  • 07:23 AM
    SAsamu21
    $1.50

    Bought 4.411765 West Ham United FC for Spread: West Ham United FC (-1.5) at 0.34

  • 07:23 AM
    SAsamu21
    $1.50

    Bought 4.411765 West Ham United FC for Spread: West Ham United FC (-1.5) at 0.34

  • 07:23 AM
    0X0x92F59e08060C00C9b2Dde0098D272f66C34C52A2-1786873013481
    $3.91

    Bought 11.5 West Ham United FC for Spread: West Ham United FC (-1.5) at 0.34

  • 07:23 AM
    FEferrariChampions2026
    $150.38

    Bought 442.29 West Ham United FC for Spread: West Ham United FC (-1.5) at 0.34

  • 07:23 AM
    SEsentrio
    $1.70

    Bought 5 West Ham United FC for Spread: West Ham United FC (-1.5) at 0.34

  • 07:23 AM
    SEsentrio
    $40.30

    Bought 118.52 West Ham United FC for Spread: West Ham United FC (-1.5) at 0.34

  • 07:23 AM
    FEferrariChampions2026
    $214.10

    Bought 629.72 West Ham United FC for Spread: West Ham United FC (-1.5) at 0.34

Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event

WR1
wr0ngw4yb3tt0r
Event PnL
+$64.86
Volume
$19,905.64
Positions
Wrexham AFCUnderUnder
NO2
no1dodgersfan
Event PnL
-$106.27
Volume
$12,207.05
Positions
OverOverWest Ham United FC+3
FL3
Flaznorp
Event PnL
+$6.22
Volume
$5,808.45
Positions
UnderUnderWest Ham United FC+9
UP4
UpTheBlues
Event PnL
+$27.36
Volume
$5,455.95
Positions
West Ham United FCUnderOver+5
KA5
kaiserfranz44
Event PnL
-$19.91
Volume
$3,982.46
Positions
Over
CA6
caspar1248
Event PnL
-$27.25
Volume
$3,428.59
Positions
OverUnderOver
GO7
GoalLineGhost
Event PnL
+$49.53
Volume
$3,049.83
Positions
UnderWest Ham United FCUnder+4
NI8
Nikitka
Event PnL
+$11.24
Volume
$2,246.67
Positions
West Ham United FC

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current market consensus on "West Ham United FC vs. Wrexham AFC - More Markets"?

As of the latest update, Both Teams to Score leads the field as the frontrunner with a 56% win probability. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $91.4K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.

How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?

The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.

Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?

Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Both Teams to Score. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 56%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 54%, a negative EV Gap of -2% that signals the contract is overpriced.

Get Started