
Democratic VP Nominee 2028
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Democratic VP Nominee 2028”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is dominating the market with an overwhelming 10.5% chance of winning. Elissa Slotkin follows in second place at 6.9%, while Wes Moore sits in third with 6.4%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $116.4K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (10.5%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 11¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $10.0K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Elissa Slotkin (6.9%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Elissa Slotkin maintains a 6.9% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 7¢.
- Wes Moore (6.4%): Sitting in third place with a 6.4% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Wes Moore, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~76.3%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes Andy Beshear (6.2%), Pete Buttigieg (5.6%), and James Talarico (5.4%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Gretchen Whitmer are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez | 10.5% | $10.0K | 11¢ | 90¢ |
| 2 | Elissa Slotkin | 6.9% | $1.8K | 7¢ | 93¢ |
| 3 | Wes Moore | 6.3% | $2.4K | 6¢ | 94¢ |
| 4 | Andy Beshear | 6.2% | $5.5K | 6¢ | 94¢ |
| 5 | Pete Buttigieg | 5.6% | $5.4K | 6¢ | 94¢ |
| 6 | James Talarico | 5.4% | $1.3K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 7 | Gretchen Whitmer | 5.3% | $9.2K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 8 | Jon Ossoff | 4.9% | $2.8K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 9 | Josh Shapiro | 4.4% | $5.5K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 10 | Raphael Warnock | 4.3% | $2.6K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 11 | Mark Kelly | 4.3% | $4.0K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 12 | Phil Murphy | 3.6% | $2.7K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 13 | Bernie Sanders | 3.5% | $2.6K | 4¢ | 97¢ |
| 14 | Andrew Yang | 3.1% | $960 | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 15 | Kim Kardashian | 2.9% | $2.9K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 16 | Roy Cooper | 2.8% | $1.7K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 17 | J.B. Pritzker | 2.6% | $1.5K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 18 | Zohran Mamdani | 2.5% | $13.8K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 19 | Chris Murphy | 2.5% | $2.0K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 20 | Gavin Newsom | 2.5% | $2.3K | 3¢ | 98¢ |
| 21 | Rahm Emanuel | 2.5% | $2.9K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 22 | LeBron James | 2.3% | $734 | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 23 | Ro Khanna | 1.9% | $3.6K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 24 | Gina Raimondo | 1.6% | $2.7K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 25 | Ruben Gallego | 1.5% | $501 | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 26 | Kamala Harris | 1.4% | $859 | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 27 | Barack Obama | 1.0% | $2.2K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 28 | Oprah Winfrey | 0.9% | $1.3K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 29 | Michelle Obama | 0.9% | $1.6K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 30 | Jon Stewart | 0.9% | $2.0K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 31 | Tim Walz | 0.8% | $1.8K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 32 | Hillary Clinton | 0.8% | $533 | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 33 | Jared Polis | 0.8% | $820 | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 34 | George Clooney | 0.8% | $1.5K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 35 | Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson | 0.8% | $1.2K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 36 | Cory Booker | 0.7% | $1.1K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 37 | Hunter Biden | 0.7% | $4.3K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 38 | Stephen A. Smith | 0.6% | $2.1K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 39 | Chelsea Clinton | 0.6% | $537 | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 40 | John Fetterman | 0.5% | $742 | 1¢ | 100¢ |
| 41 | Beto O’Rourke | 0.4% | $569 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 42 | Mark Cuban | 0.3% | $1.1K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 43 | Liz Cheney | 0.3% | $919 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve according to the first individual to be formally nominated by the Democratic Party for Vice President of the United States in the 2028 Presidential election cycle who accepts the nomination.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of official Democratic Party sources, including https://democrats.org/.
Any replacement of the nominee before election day will not change the resolution of the market.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Elissa Slotkin currently trades at 6.9%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 1.3%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -5.6%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Liz Cheney as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 0.3% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 18.4% — yielding an impressive +18.1% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Beto O’Rourke (EV Gap: +17.4%) and Mark Cuban (EV Gap: +9.7%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez | 10.5% | 7.1% | -3.4% |
| Elissa Slotkin | 6.9% | 1.3% | -5.6% |
| Wes Moore | 6.3% | 5.8% | -0.5% |
| Andy Beshear | 6.2% | 1.5% | -4.6% |
| Pete Buttigieg | 5.6% | 4.9% | -0.7% |
| James Talarico | 5.4% | 5.8% | +0.4% |
| Gretchen Whitmer | 5.3% | 1.4% | -3.9% |
| Jon Ossoff | 4.9% | 1.3% | -3.6% |
| Josh Shapiro | 4.4% | 1.4% | -3.0% |
| Raphael Warnock | 4.3% | 5.3% | +1.0% |
| Mark Kelly | 4.3% | 0.7% | -3.5% |
| Phil Murphy | 3.6% | 1.4% | -2.3% |
| Bernie Sanders | 3.5% | 0.8% | -2.7% |
| Andrew Yang | 3.1% | 4.6% | +1.5% |
| Kim Kardashian | 2.9% | 0.8% | -2.1% |
| Roy Cooper | 2.8% | 6.2% | +3.5% |
| J.B. Pritzker | 2.6% | 6.0% | +3.4% |
| Zohran Mamdani | 2.5% | 5.4% | +2.9% |
| Chris Murphy | 2.5% | 0.5% | -2.0% |
| Gavin Newsom | 2.5% | 6.5% | +4.0% |
| Rahm Emanuel | 2.5% | 0.7% | -1.7% |
| LeBron James | 2.3% | 5.4% | +3.1% |
| Ro Khanna | 1.9% | 6.8% | +4.9% |
| Gina Raimondo | 1.6% | 0.6% | -1.0% |
| Ruben Gallego | 1.5% | 4.1% | +2.7% |
| Kamala Harris | 1.4% | 3.9% | +2.5% |
| Barack Obama | 1.0% | 6.2% | +5.2% |
| Oprah Winfrey | 0.9% | 6.2% | +5.3% |
| Michelle Obama | 0.9% | 4.5% | +3.6% |
| Jon Stewart | 0.9% | 8.2% | +7.3% |
| Tim Walz | 0.8% | 5.1% | +4.3% |
| Hillary Clinton | 0.8% | 6.6% | +5.8% |
| Jared Polis | 0.8% | 7.8% | +7.1% |
| George Clooney | 0.8% | 6.4% | +5.7% |
| Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson | 0.8% | 6.2% | +5.5% |
| Cory Booker | 0.7% | 7.4% | +6.7% |
| Hunter Biden | 0.7% | 6.6% | +6.0% |
| Stephen A. Smith | 0.6% | 9.9% | +9.3% |
| Chelsea Clinton | 0.6% | 5.1% | +4.5% |
| John Fetterman | 0.5% | 6.2% | +5.7% |
| Beto O’Rourke | 0.4% | 17.8% | +17.4% |
| Mark Cuban | 0.3% | 10.0% | +9.7% |
| Liz CheneyBest EV | 0.3% | 18.4% | +18.1% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Oct 23, 2026
- 07:31 AMAMaml32dzq$5.51
Bought 5.74 No for Will Mark Kelly be the 2028 Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee? at 0.96
- 07:15 AMAJAJSV$0.41
Bought 41 Yes for Will Jon Stewart be the 2028 Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee? at 0.01
- 07:05 AMAJAJSV$1.17
Bought 116.666667 Yes for Will Chelsea Clinton be the 2028 Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee? at 0.01
- 07:05 AMWHwhcr2s5j$6.39
Bought 6.52 No for Will Bernie Sanders be the 2028 Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee? at 0.98
- 06:59 AMASas6b8kj9$6.25
Bought 6.65 No for Will Wes Moore be the 2028 Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee? at 0.94
- 05:11 AMPOpo-ly28-test-user6$0.70
Sold 23.34 Yes for Will Andy Beshear be the 2028 Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee? at 0.03
- 04:44 AMXExeeypkdr$6.54
Bought 6.81 No for Will James Talarico be the 2028 Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee? at 0.96
- 04:37 AM0X0x63f46939049E93795d11a5Df663Ab20fb405aC02-1723791048958$4.93
Bought 5.08 No for Will Mark Kelly be the 2028 Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee? at 0.97
- 04:11 AM0X0x4E0CFC839328D92171F5CB7c36AAAF0Ba7D4d003-1724117149360$6.15
Bought 6.28 No for Will Raphael Warnock be the 2028 Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee? at 0.98
- 03:59 AM0X0x66E7ce01C6831B8A2503D09eDD6167152Ee68BcD-1771870353938$0.93
Sold 46.7 Yes for Will Phil Murphy be the 2028 Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee? at 0.02
- 02:00 AM0X0x11295191900181082625E0811dd5B656Aa7026cE-1724235877914$6.46
Sold 6.95 No for Will Wes Moore be the 2028 Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee? at 0.93
- 01:54 AM6464saw6r4$8.15
Sold 8.49 No for Will Josh Shapiro be the 2028 Democratic Vice-Presidential nominee? at 0.96
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "Democratic VP Nominee 2028"?
As of the latest update, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez leads the field as the frontrunner with a 10.5% win probability, followed by Elissa Slotkin at 6.9% and Wes Moore at 6.4%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $116.4K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Liz Cheney as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 0.3% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 18.4% — an Expected Value gap of +18.1%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Elissa Slotkin. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 6.9%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 1.3%, a negative EV Gap of -5.6% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Beto O’Rourke holds a positive EV Gap of +17.4%, and Mark Cuban shows +9.7%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
