
Wake Forest vs. SMU
Kernzusammenfassung
Laut den neuesten Prognosemarktdaten zur Frage „Wake Forest vs. SMU“ haben die Händler einen starken Konsens gebildet.
Derzeit dominiert Wake Forest 1H O/U 11.5 den Markt mit einer überwältigenden Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit von 9.960%. 1Q O/U 7.5 folgt auf dem zweiten Platz mit 9.955%, während 1Q O/U 10.5 mit 9.955% auf dem dritten Platz liegt. Das Wettvolumen dieses Marktes hat bereits $291,2K erreicht, was auf großes Interesse hindeutet.
Aufschlüsselung der Wettbewerbsstufen
Um besser einzuschätzen, wo jedes mögliche Ergebnis steht, lässt sich der Markt anhand der impliziten Wahrscheinlichkeit und der Kontraktpreise in drei Handelsstufen unterteilen:
🥇 Stufe 1: Der dominante Spitzenreiter
- Wake Forest 1H O/U 11.5 (9.960%): Mit der höchsten Wahrscheinlichkeit wird Wake Forest 1H O/U 11.5 vom Orderbuch stark favorisiert. Wer auf dieses Ergebnis setzen will, sieht sich einem „Buy Yes“-Kontraktpreis von 9.960¢ gegenüber – ein Zeichen hoher Marktüberzeugung.
🥈 Stufe 2: Die wichtigsten Herausforderer
- 1Q O/U 7.5 (9.955%): Als tragfähigste Alternative hält 1Q O/U 7.5 eine Wahrscheinlichkeit von 9.955%, einzutreten. Seine „Buy Yes“-Anteile werden derzeit zu 9.955¢ gehandelt.
- 1Q O/U 10.5 (9.955%): Auf dem dritten Platz mit 9.955% Wahrscheinlichkeit zeigt der Markt eine maßvolle Skepsis gegenüber 1Q O/U 10.5 und behandelt es als Außenseiter, sofern sich die Dynamik nicht ändert.
🥉 Stufe 3: Die Long-Tail-Optionen (zusammen ~0%)
Über die Top-3 hinaus wird ein breites Feld an Makrovariablen und Außenseiter-Ergebnissen verfolgt. Auch wenn ihre Einzelwahrscheinlichkeiten niedrig sind, bilden sie wichtige Absicherungen für spekulative Händler:
- Alternative Optionen: Dazu gehören 1Q O/U 13.5 (9.955%), Wake Forest O/U 20.5 (9.670%) und 1H Moneyline (9.500%).
- Spekulatives Volumen: Trotz geringer statistischer Wahrscheinlichkeit ziehen bestimmte Long-Tail-Kontrakte wie Wake Forest O/U 23.5 weiterhin nennenswertes Interesse an.
Umfassendes Orderbuch- & Preis-Dashboard
Die folgende Tabelle zeigt die vollständige Aufschlüsselung von Kontraktpreisen, Wahrscheinlichkeiten und Markttiefe für alle gelisteten Ergebnisse dieses Prognose-Pools:
| Rang | Vorhergesagtes Ergebnis | Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit | Handelsvolumen | Yes kaufen (Kosten) | No kaufen (Kosten) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wake Forest 1H O/U 11.5 | 9960.0% | — | 9960¢ | -9860¢ |
| 2 | 1Q O/U 7.5 | 9955.0% | — | 9955¢ | -9855¢ |
| 3 | 1Q O/U 10.5 | 9955.0% | $42 | 9955¢ | -9855¢ |
| 4 | 1Q O/U 13.5 | 9955.0% | — | 9955¢ | -9855¢ |
| 5 | Wake Forest O/U 20.5 | 9670.0% | — | 9670¢ | -9570¢ |
| 6 | 1H Moneyline | 9500.0% | $140 | 9500¢ | -9400¢ |
| 7 | Wake Forest O/U 23.5 | 9200.0% | — | 9200¢ | -9100¢ |
| 8 | 1Q Moneyline | 9150.0% | $30 | 9150¢ | -9050¢ |
| 9 | O/U 41.5 | 9100.0% | — | 9100¢ | -9000¢ |
| 10 | Wake Forest 1H O/U 13.5 | 9000.0% | — | 9000¢ | -8900¢ |
| 11 | O/U 35.5 | 8800.0% | — | 8800¢ | -8700¢ |
| 12 | O/U 37.5 | 8750.0% | — | 8750¢ | -8650¢ |
| 13 | O/U 39.5 | 8500.0% | — | 8500¢ | -8400¢ |
| 14 | O/U 43.5 | 8400.0% | — | 8400¢ | -8300¢ |
| 15 | Wake Forest 1H O/U 15.5 | 8250.0% | — | 8250¢ | -8150¢ |
| 16 | O/U 49.5 | 8200.0% | $2 | 8200¢ | -8100¢ |
| 17 | O/U 45.5 | 8100.0% | — | 8100¢ | -8000¢ |
| 18 | O/U 47.5 | 8100.0% | — | 8100¢ | -8000¢ |
| 19 | 2Q O/U 7.5 | 8050.0% | — | 8050¢ | -7950¢ |
| 20 | Wake Forest vs. SMU | 7950.0% | $296.1K | 7950¢ | -7850¢ |
| 21 | Spread -1.5 | 7950.0% | $7.3K | 7950¢ | -7850¢ |
| 22 | Spread -2.5 | 7750.0% | $22.5K | 7750¢ | -7650¢ |
| 23 | 4Q O/U 7.5 | 7700.0% | — | 7700¢ | -7600¢ |
| 24 | O/U 51.5 | 7600.0% | — | 7600¢ | -7500¢ |
| 25 | Spread -3.5 | 7100.0% | $849 | 7100¢ | -7000¢ |
| 26 | 3Q O/U 7.5 | 7000.0% | — | 7000¢ | -6900¢ |
| 27 | Spread -4.5 | 6950.0% | $833 | 6950¢ | -6850¢ |
| 28 | Spread -5.5 | 6850.0% | $2.5K | 6850¢ | -6750¢ |
| 29 | 2Q O/U 10.5 | 6800.0% | — | 6800¢ | -6700¢ |
| 30 | 4Q O/U 10.5 | 6700.0% | — | 6700¢ | -6600¢ |
| 31 | Spread -6.5 | 6550.0% | $290 | 6550¢ | -6450¢ |
| 32 | O/U 53.5 | 6550.0% | — | 6550¢ | -6450¢ |
| 33 | 1H O/U 27.5 | 6450.0% | — | 6450¢ | -6350¢ |
| 34 | O/U 55.5 | 6150.0% | $732 | 6150¢ | -6050¢ |
| 35 | 2Q O/U 13.5 | 6050.0% | — | 6050¢ | -5950¢ |
| 36 | 4Q O/U 13.5 | 5950.0% | — | 5950¢ | -5850¢ |
| 37 | Spread -7.5 | 5750.0% | $4.3K | 5750¢ | -5650¢ |
| 38 | 2H O/U 27.5 | 5650.0% | — | 5650¢ | -5550¢ |
| 39 | 3Q O/U 10.5 | 5650.0% | — | 5650¢ | -5550¢ |
| 40 | O/U 57.5 | 5550.0% | $110 | 5550¢ | -5450¢ |
| 41 | 3Q O/U 13.5 | 5250.0% | — | 5250¢ | -5150¢ |
| 42 | Spread -0.5 | 5200.0% | $288 | 5200¢ | -5100¢ |
| 43 | Spread -10.5 | 5150.0% | $2.0K | 5150¢ | -5050¢ |
| 44 | Spread -8.5 | 5150.0% | $8 | 5150¢ | -5050¢ |
| 45 | SMU O/U 26.5 | 5100.0% | — | 5100¢ | -5000¢ |
| 46 | SMU 1H O/U 14.5 | 5100.0% | — | 5100¢ | -5000¢ |
| 47 | Wake Forest Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5100.0% | — | 5100¢ | -5000¢ |
| 48 | 2H O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 49 | 2H O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 50 | 2H O/U 33.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 51 | Wake Forest O/U 29.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 52 | SMU O/U 32.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 53 | SMU O/U 35.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 54 | SMU 1H O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 55 | Wake Forest 2H O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 56 | Wake Forest 2H O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 57 | Wake Forest 2H O/U 15.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 58 | SMU 2H O/U 12.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 59 | SMU 2H O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 60 | SMU 2H O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 61 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 62 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 63 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 64 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 65 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 66 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 67 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 68 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q2 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 69 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 70 | Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 71 | Pick-Six Scored | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 72 | Wake Forest vs. SMU: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 73 | Wake Forest vs. SMU: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 74 | Wake Forest vs. SMU: Total Touchdowns O/U 7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 75 | Wake Forest Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 76 | Wake Forest Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 77 | Wake Forest Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 78 | SMU Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 79 | SMU Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 80 | Wake Forest Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 81 | SMU Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 82 | Wake Forest Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 83 | Wake Forest Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 84 | SMU Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 85 | SMU Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 86 | Wake Forest Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 87 | Wake Forest Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 88 | Wake Forest Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 89 | SMU Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 90 | SMU Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 91 | SMU Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 92 | Wake Forest Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 93 | Wake Forest Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 94 | Wake Forest Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 95 | SMU Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 96 | SMU Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 97 | SMU Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 98 | Wake Forest 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 99 | Wake Forest 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 100 | SMU 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 101 | SMU 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 102 | Wake Forest Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 103 | Wake Forest Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 104 | SMU Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 105 | SMU Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 106 | Wake Forest Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 107 | SMU Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 108 | Wake Forest Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 109 | Wake Forest Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 110 | SMU Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 111 | SMU Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 112 | SMU Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 113 | Wake Forest Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 114 | Wake Forest Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 115 | Wake Forest Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 116 | SMU Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 117 | SMU Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 118 | SMU Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 119 | Wake Forest vs. SMU: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 120 | Wake Forest vs. SMU: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 121 | 2H Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 122 | 2Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 123 | 3Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 124 | 4Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 125 | SMU Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 126 | 1H O/U 21.5 | 4900.0% | — | 4900¢ | -4800¢ |
| 127 | 1H O/U 24.5 | 4900.0% | — | 4900¢ | -4800¢ |
| 128 | 1H O/U 30.5 | 4900.0% | $277 | 4900¢ | -4800¢ |
| 129 | Wake Forest O/U 26.5 | 4900.0% | — | 4900¢ | -4800¢ |
| 130 | Wake Forest O/U 32.5 | 4900.0% | — | 4900¢ | -4800¢ |
| 131 | SMU O/U 23.5 | 4900.0% | — | 4900¢ | -4800¢ |
| 132 | O/U 59.5 | 4850.0% | $22.9K | 4850¢ | -4750¢ |
| 133 | 1H O/U 33.5 | 4750.0% | — | 4750¢ | -4650¢ |
| 134 | 2Q O/U 16.5 | 4650.0% | — | 4650¢ | -4550¢ |
| 135 | 2H O/U 30.5 | 4600.0% | — | 4600¢ | -4500¢ |
| 136 | Spread -13.5 | 4450.0% | $182 | 4450¢ | -4350¢ |
| 137 | O/U 61.5 | 4450.0% | $2.4K | 4450¢ | -4350¢ |
| 138 | O/U 63.5 | 4400.0% | $47 | 4400¢ | -4300¢ |
| 139 | Wake Forest vs. SMU: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 4400.0% | — | 4400¢ | -4300¢ |
| 140 | Spread -14.5 | 4150.0% | $55 | 4150¢ | -4050¢ |
| 141 | 4Q O/U 16.5 | 4000.0% | — | 4000¢ | -3900¢ |
| 142 | Game Goes to Overtime | 3950.0% | — | 3950¢ | -3850¢ |
| 143 | Spread -16.5 | 3850.0% | $1.0K | 3850¢ | -3750¢ |
| 144 | SMU O/U 29.5 | 3700.0% | — | 3700¢ | -3600¢ |
| 145 | O/U 67.5 | 3600.0% | — | 3600¢ | -3500¢ |
| 146 | Spread -8.5 | 3550.0% | $8 | 3550¢ | -3450¢ |
| 147 | Spread -17.5 | 3350.0% | — | 3350¢ | -3250¢ |
| 148 | O/U 69.5 | 3350.0% | — | 3350¢ | -3250¢ |
| 149 | O/U 65.5 | 3250.0% | $2.0K | 3250¢ | -3150¢ |
| 150 | 2Q O/U 19.5 | 3200.0% | — | 3200¢ | -3100¢ |
| 151 | 4Q O/U 19.5 | 3150.0% | — | 3150¢ | -3050¢ |
| 152 | 3Q O/U 16.5 | 3100.0% | — | 3100¢ | -3000¢ |
| 153 | Spread -0.5 | 3000.0% | $288 | 3000¢ | -2900¢ |
| 154 | Spread -20.5 | 2950.0% | — | 2950¢ | -2850¢ |
| 155 | O/U 73.5 | 2800.0% | — | 2800¢ | -2700¢ |
| 156 | O/U 75.5 | 2800.0% | — | 2800¢ | -2700¢ |
| 157 | SMU 1H O/U 12.5 | 2700.0% | $5 | 2700¢ | -2600¢ |
| 158 | Spread -20.5 | 2450.0% | — | 2450¢ | -2350¢ |
| 159 | 3Q O/U 19.5 | 2250.0% | — | 2250¢ | -2150¢ |
| 160 | O/U 71.5 | 1950.0% | $1.9K | 1950¢ | -1850¢ |
| 161 | Spread -1.5 | 1750.0% | $7.3K | 1750¢ | -1650¢ |
| 162 | Spread -2.5 | 1650.0% | $22.5K | 1650¢ | -1550¢ |
| 163 | Spread -3.5 | 1250.0% | $849 | 1250¢ | -1150¢ |
| 164 | Spread -4.5 | 1050.0% | $833 | 1050¢ | -950¢ |
| 165 | Spread -5.5 | 950.0% | $2.5K | 950¢ | -850¢ |
| 166 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 950.0% | — | 950¢ | -850¢ |
| 167 | Spread -6.5 | 850.0% | $290 | 850¢ | -750¢ |
| 168 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q1 | 700.0% | — | 700¢ | -600¢ |
| 169 | Spread -7.5 | 550.0% | $4.3K | 550¢ | -450¢ |
| 170 | Spread -10.5 | 350.0% | $2.0K | 350¢ | -250¢ |
| 171 | Spread -13.5 | 245.0% | $182 | 245¢ | -145¢ |
| 172 | Spread -14.5 | 240.0% | $55 | 240¢ | -140¢ |
| 173 | Spread -17.5 | 140.0% | — | 140¢ | -40¢ |
| 174 | Spread -16.5 | 100.0% | $1.0K | 100¢ | 0¢ |
| 175 | 1Q O/U 16.5 | 45.0% | — | 45¢ | 55¢ |
| 176 | 1Q O/U 19.5 | 45.0% | — | 45¢ | 55¢ |
Abrechnungsregeln
In the upcoming college football game between Wake Forest and SMU, originally scheduled for Saturday, November 14, 2026 at 12:00 PM ET (as of creation of the first market related to the event):
This market will resolve to "Wake Forest" if Wake Forest win the game.
This market will resolve to "SMU" if SMU win the game.
Overtime is included if played.
If the game ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50.
If this market's outcome was definitively determined under its rules by the listed resolution sources before abandonment, that outcome will stand. Otherwise, the following no-result provisions apply. If the game is canceled, does not start by Monday, November 16, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, or is abandoned with no official result by that time, this market will resolve 50-50.
Handelsaktivitäten
Hier sind die Handelsaktivitäten für dieses Event.
Nov 14, 2026
- 10:01 AMRNRNGLuck$3.00
Bought 6.25 Wake Forest for Wake Forest vs. SMU at 0.48
- 09:03 AM2626trpl$10.00
Bought 18.867925 SMU for Wake Forest vs. SMU at 0.53
- 09:02 AMFRfrenchflair14$5.88
Bought 12.25 Wake Forest for Wake Forest vs. SMU at 0.48
- 09:01 AMMAMAGIC23X$2.65
Bought 5 SMU for Wake Forest vs. SMU at 0.53
- 08:53 AMAKakosialex703$200.00
Bought 392.156863 Wake Forest for Spread: SMU (-1.5) at 0.51
- 08:50 AM0X0x5f13fc993d6a04e7FB801f9204cC3c26Eb6Cf926-1781987576884$2.65
Bought 5 SMU for Wake Forest vs. SMU at 0.53
- 08:48 AMPEPEYZ-BIGGEST-FAN$6,360.00
Bought 12000 SMU for Wake Forest vs. SMU at 0.53
- 07:41 AMPRProvvy$1.25
Bought 1.602563 Over for Wake Forest vs. SMU: O/U 49.5 at 0.78
- 07:35 AMIQiqcentury11$10.00
Bought 19.23077 Over for Wake Forest vs. SMU: O/U 59.5 at 0.52
- 07:10 AMBOboneywt17$1,460.17
Bought 2755.037736 SMU for Wake Forest vs. SMU at 0.53
- 07:09 AMBLBlitzmn2$5.03
Bought 10.265307 Wake Forest for Wake Forest vs. SMU at 0.49
- 07:07 AM——$49.00
Bought 100 Wake Forest for Wake Forest vs. SMU at 0.49
Wal-Wallets, die auf dieses Event wetten
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Wie lautet der aktuelle Marktkonsens zu „Wake Forest vs. SMU“?
Zum letzten Stand führt Wake Forest 1H O/U 11.5 mit einer Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit von 9.960%, gefolgt von 1Q O/U 7.5 mit 9.955% und 1Q O/U 10.5 mit 9.955%. Das Gesamthandelsvolumen erreicht $291,2K, was hohe Liquidität und Beteiligung signalisiert.
