
Rutgers vs. Wisconsin
Kernzusammenfassung
Laut den neuesten Prognosemarktdaten zur Frage „Rutgers vs. Wisconsin“ haben die Händler einen starken Konsens gebildet.
Derzeit dominiert 1Q O/U 7.5 den Markt mit einer überwältigenden Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit von 9.950%. 1Q Spread -2.5 folgt auf dem zweiten Platz mit 9.950%, während 1Q Spread -3.5 mit 9.400% auf dem dritten Platz liegt. Das Wettvolumen dieses Marktes hat bereits $129,7K erreicht, was auf großes Interesse hindeutet.
Aufschlüsselung der Wettbewerbsstufen
Um besser einzuschätzen, wo jedes mögliche Ergebnis steht, lässt sich der Markt anhand der impliziten Wahrscheinlichkeit und der Kontraktpreise in drei Handelsstufen unterteilen:
🥇 Stufe 1: Der dominante Spitzenreiter
- 1Q O/U 7.5 (9.950%): Mit der höchsten Wahrscheinlichkeit wird 1Q O/U 7.5 vom Orderbuch stark favorisiert. Wer auf dieses Ergebnis setzen will, sieht sich einem „Buy Yes“-Kontraktpreis von 9.950¢ gegenüber – ein Zeichen hoher Marktüberzeugung.
🥈 Stufe 2: Die wichtigsten Herausforderer
- 1Q Spread -2.5 (9.950%): Als tragfähigste Alternative hält 1Q Spread -2.5 eine Wahrscheinlichkeit von 9.950%, einzutreten. Seine „Buy Yes“-Anteile werden derzeit zu 9.950¢ gehandelt.
- 1Q Spread -3.5 (9.400%): Auf dem dritten Platz mit 9.400% Wahrscheinlichkeit zeigt der Markt eine maßvolle Skepsis gegenüber 1Q Spread -3.5 und behandelt es als Außenseiter, sofern sich die Dynamik nicht ändert.
🥉 Stufe 3: Die Long-Tail-Optionen (zusammen ~0%)
Über die Top-3 hinaus wird ein breites Feld an Makrovariablen und Außenseiter-Ergebnissen verfolgt. Auch wenn ihre Einzelwahrscheinlichkeiten niedrig sind, bilden sie wichtige Absicherungen für spekulative Händler:
- Alternative Optionen: Dazu gehören Spread -1.5 (8.850%), Spread -2.5 (8.750%) und Spread -4.5 (8.200%).
- Spekulatives Volumen: Trotz geringer statistischer Wahrscheinlichkeit ziehen bestimmte Long-Tail-Kontrakte wie Spread -5.5 weiterhin nennenswertes Interesse an.
Umfassendes Orderbuch- & Preis-Dashboard
Die folgende Tabelle zeigt die vollständige Aufschlüsselung von Kontraktpreisen, Wahrscheinlichkeiten und Markttiefe für alle gelisteten Ergebnisse dieses Prognose-Pools:
| Rang | Vorhergesagtes Ergebnis | Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit | Handelsvolumen | Yes kaufen (Kosten) | No kaufen (Kosten) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1Q O/U 7.5 | 9950.0% | — | 9950¢ | -9850¢ |
| 2 | 1Q Spread -2.5 | 9950.0% | — | 9950¢ | -9850¢ |
| 3 | 1Q Spread -3.5 | 9400.0% | — | 9400¢ | -9300¢ |
| 4 | Spread -1.5 | 8850.0% | — | 8850¢ | -8750¢ |
| 5 | Spread -2.5 | 8750.0% | $8 | 8750¢ | -8650¢ |
| 6 | Spread -4.5 | 8200.0% | — | 8200¢ | -8100¢ |
| 7 | Spread -5.5 | 8150.0% | — | 8150¢ | -8050¢ |
| 8 | Spread -3.5 | 8050.0% | — | 8050¢ | -7950¢ |
| 9 | Spread -6.5 | 8000.0% | — | 8000¢ | -7900¢ |
| 10 | Spread -7.5 | 7650.0% | — | 7650¢ | -7550¢ |
| 11 | Wisconsin O/U 23.5 | 7500.0% | — | 7500¢ | -7400¢ |
| 12 | 2Q Spread -3.5 | 7400.0% | — | 7400¢ | -7300¢ |
| 13 | Spread -10.5 | 6800.0% | — | 6800¢ | -6700¢ |
| 14 | 2Q O/U 7.5 | 6800.0% | — | 6800¢ | -6700¢ |
| 15 | Spread -13.5 | 6750.0% | — | 6750¢ | -6650¢ |
| 16 | 2Q Spread -2.5 | 6700.0% | — | 6700¢ | -6600¢ |
| 17 | O/U 37.5 | 6650.0% | $94 | 6650¢ | -6550¢ |
| 18 | 2Q O/U 10.5 | 6350.0% | — | 6350¢ | -6250¢ |
| 19 | Spread -15.5 | 6300.0% | — | 6300¢ | -6200¢ |
| 20 | 2H Spread -4.5 | 6150.0% | — | 6150¢ | -6050¢ |
| 21 | 1H Spread -6.5 | 6050.0% | — | 6050¢ | -5950¢ |
| 22 | Spread -18.5 | 5900.0% | $916 | 5900¢ | -5800¢ |
| 23 | Spread -19.5 | 5850.0% | $59.4K | 5850¢ | -5750¢ |
| 24 | 4Q O/U 7.5 | 5800.0% | — | 5800¢ | -5700¢ |
| 25 | 4Q Spread -3.5 | 5800.0% | — | 5800¢ | -5700¢ |
| 26 | Spread -9.5 | 5700.0% | — | 5700¢ | -5600¢ |
| 27 | 4Q Spread -2.5 | 5700.0% | — | 5700¢ | -5600¢ |
| 28 | Spread -14.5 | 5650.0% | — | 5650¢ | -5550¢ |
| 29 | O/U 51.5 | 5650.0% | — | 5650¢ | -5550¢ |
| 30 | 3Q Spread -2.5 | 5500.0% | — | 5500¢ | -5400¢ |
| 31 | O/U 53.5 | 5450.0% | — | 5450¢ | -5350¢ |
| 32 | Spread -16.5 | 5400.0% | $1.3K | 5400¢ | -5300¢ |
| 33 | Wisconsin 1H O/U 16.5 | 5400.0% | — | 5400¢ | -5300¢ |
| 34 | Spread -25.5 | 5400.0% | — | 5400¢ | -5300¢ |
| 35 | Spread -26.5 | 5400.0% | — | 5400¢ | -5300¢ |
| 36 | Spread -17.5 | 5300.0% | $49 | 5300¢ | -5200¢ |
| 37 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q1 | 5300.0% | — | 5300¢ | -5200¢ |
| 38 | Spread -28.5 | 5300.0% | — | 5300¢ | -5200¢ |
| 39 | 1Q Spread -0.5 | 5300.0% | — | 5300¢ | -5200¢ |
| 40 | 3Q O/U 7.5 | 5250.0% | — | 5250¢ | -5150¢ |
| 41 | Spread -31.5 | 5250.0% | — | 5250¢ | -5150¢ |
| 42 | O/U 57.5 | 5200.0% | — | 5200¢ | -5100¢ |
| 43 | O/U 59.5 | 5200.0% | — | 5200¢ | -5100¢ |
| 44 | Spread -32.5 | 5200.0% | — | 5200¢ | -5100¢ |
| 45 | 2H Spread -6.5 | 5200.0% | — | 5200¢ | -5100¢ |
| 46 | Spread -11.5 | 5150.0% | — | 5150¢ | -5050¢ |
| 47 | O/U 43.5 | 5100.0% | $7.6K | 5100¢ | -5000¢ |
| 48 | O/U 63.5 | 5100.0% | — | 5100¢ | -5000¢ |
| 49 | 2H O/U 33.5 | 5100.0% | — | 5100¢ | -5000¢ |
| 50 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 51 | Wisconsin Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 52 | Wisconsin Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 53 | Wisconsin Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 54 | Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 55 | Wisconsin Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 56 | Wisconsin Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 57 | Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5005.0% | — | 5005¢ | -4905¢ |
| 58 | Spread -13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 59 | Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 60 | Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 61 | O/U 65.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 62 | O/U 69.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 63 | O/U 71.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 64 | O/U 73.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 65 | O/U 75.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 66 | 1H O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 67 | 1H O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 68 | 1H O/U 33.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 69 | 2H O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 70 | 2H O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 71 | Rutgers O/U 26.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 72 | Rutgers O/U 29.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 73 | Rutgers O/U 32.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 74 | Wisconsin O/U 26.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 75 | Wisconsin O/U 29.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 76 | Wisconsin O/U 32.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 77 | Wisconsin O/U 35.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 78 | Rutgers 1H O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 79 | Rutgers 1H O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 80 | Wisconsin 1H O/U 12.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 81 | Wisconsin 1H O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 82 | Rutgers 2H O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 83 | Rutgers 2H O/U 15.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 84 | Wisconsin 2H O/U 12.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 85 | Wisconsin 2H O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 86 | Wisconsin 2H O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 87 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 88 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 89 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 90 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 91 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 92 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 93 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q2 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 94 | Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 95 | Pick-Six Scored | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 96 | Rutgers vs. Wisconsin: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 97 | Rutgers vs. Wisconsin: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 98 | Rutgers vs. Wisconsin: Total Touchdowns O/U 7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 99 | Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 100 | Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 101 | Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 102 | Wisconsin Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 103 | Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 104 | Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 105 | Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 106 | Wisconsin Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 107 | Wisconsin Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 108 | Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 109 | Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 110 | Wisconsin Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 111 | Wisconsin Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 112 | Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 113 | Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 114 | Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 115 | Wisconsin Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 116 | Wisconsin Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 117 | Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 118 | Wisconsin 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 119 | Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 120 | Wisconsin 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 121 | Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 122 | Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 123 | Wisconsin Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 124 | Wisconsin Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 125 | Wisconsin Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 126 | Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 127 | Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 128 | Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 129 | Wisconsin Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 130 | Wisconsin Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 131 | Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 132 | Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 133 | Wisconsin Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 134 | Wisconsin Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 135 | Wisconsin Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 136 | Rutgers vs. Wisconsin: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 137 | Rutgers vs. Wisconsin: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 138 | Rutgers vs. Wisconsin: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 139 | Spread -34.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 140 | 1H Spread -8.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 141 | 1H Spread -11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 142 | 2H Spread -8.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 143 | 2H Spread -11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 144 | 2Q Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 145 | 2Q Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 146 | 2Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 147 | 3Q Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 148 | 3Q Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 149 | 3Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 150 | 4Q Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 151 | 4Q Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 152 | 4Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 153 | 2H Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 154 | Rutgers O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 155 | Wisconsin O/U 3.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 156 | 1H Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 157 | 2Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 158 | 3Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 159 | 4Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 160 | Spread -20.5 | 4950.0% | $2.8K | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 161 | Spread -17.5 | 4950.0% | $49 | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 162 | Spread -16.5 | 4950.0% | $1.3K | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 163 | Spread -14.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 164 | Spread -10.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 165 | Spread -8.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 166 | Spread -7.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 167 | Spread -6.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 168 | Spread -5.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 169 | 4Q O/U 10.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 170 | Rutgers 1H O/U 15.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 171 | Rutgers 2H O/U 13.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 172 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 173 | Game Goes to Overtime | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 174 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 175 | Wisconsin Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 176 | Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 177 | 2H Spread -7.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 178 | O/U 35.5 | 4750.0% | — | 4750¢ | -4650¢ |
| 179 | O/U 45.5 | 4750.0% | $21.3K | 4750¢ | -4650¢ |
| 180 | 1Q Spread -4.5 | 4735.0% | — | 4735¢ | -4635¢ |
| 181 | 1Q Spread -5.5 | 4700.0% | — | 4700¢ | -4600¢ |
| 182 | 1Q Moneyline | 4700.0% | — | 4700¢ | -4600¢ |
| 183 | 2Q O/U 13.5 | 4550.0% | — | 4550¢ | -4450¢ |
| 184 | 2Q O/U 16.5 | 4550.0% | — | 4550¢ | -4450¢ |
| 185 | Spread -8.5 | 4450.0% | — | 4450¢ | -4350¢ |
| 186 | Spread -20.5 | 4450.0% | $2.8K | 4450¢ | -4350¢ |
| 187 | 1H Spread -10.5 | 4450.0% | $1.2K | 4450¢ | -4350¢ |
| 188 | O/U 39.5 | 4400.0% | $20 | 4400¢ | -4300¢ |
| 189 | 1H Spread -13.5 | 4350.0% | — | 4350¢ | -4250¢ |
| 190 | 1H Spread -9.5 | 4300.0% | $1.7K | 4300¢ | -4200¢ |
| 191 | 2Q Spread -7.5 | 4300.0% | — | 4300¢ | -4200¢ |
| 192 | Spread -12.5 | 4200.0% | — | 4200¢ | -4100¢ |
| 193 | O/U 41.5 | 4150.0% | $33 | 4150¢ | -4050¢ |
| 194 | 4Q O/U 13.5 | 4150.0% | — | 4150¢ | -4050¢ |
| 195 | 3Q Spread -3.5 | 4000.0% | — | 4000¢ | -3900¢ |
| 196 | 2Q O/U 19.5 | 3900.0% | — | 3900¢ | -3800¢ |
| 197 | 2H Spread -9.5 | 3900.0% | — | 3900¢ | -3800¢ |
| 198 | Spread -35.5 | 3750.0% | $56 | 3750¢ | -3650¢ |
| 199 | Spread -21.5 | 3600.0% | $333 | 3600¢ | -3500¢ |
| 200 | O/U 47.5 | 3500.0% | $5.6K | 3500¢ | -3400¢ |
| 201 | 3Q O/U 10.5 | 3500.0% | — | 3500¢ | -3400¢ |
| 202 | 1H O/U 27.5 | 3450.0% | — | 3450¢ | -3350¢ |
| 203 | 3Q O/U 13.5 | 3400.0% | — | 3400¢ | -3300¢ |
| 204 | Spread -23.5 | 3350.0% | — | 3350¢ | -3250¢ |
| 205 | Spread -24.5 | 3050.0% | — | 3050¢ | -2950¢ |
| 206 | 1H O/U 30.5 | 2900.0% | — | 2900¢ | -2800¢ |
| 207 | Spread -22.5 | 2900.0% | — | 2900¢ | -2800¢ |
| 208 | O/U 49.5 | 2850.0% | — | 2850¢ | -2750¢ |
| 209 | 2H O/U 27.5 | 2700.0% | — | 2700¢ | -2600¢ |
| 210 | 3Q Spread -7.5 | 2650.0% | — | 2650¢ | -2550¢ |
| 211 | Rutgers O/U 20.5 | 2450.0% | — | 2450¢ | -2350¢ |
| 212 | 2H O/U 30.5 | 2400.0% | — | 2400¢ | -2300¢ |
| 213 | Rutgers O/U 23.5 | 2400.0% | — | 2400¢ | -2300¢ |
| 214 | 3Q O/U 16.5 | 2350.0% | — | 2350¢ | -2250¢ |
| 215 | 4Q Spread -7.5 | 2350.0% | — | 2350¢ | -2250¢ |
| 216 | 4Q O/U 16.5 | 2200.0% | — | 2200¢ | -2100¢ |
| 217 | O/U 55.5 | 1650.0% | — | 1650¢ | -1550¢ |
| 218 | 4Q O/U 19.5 | 1650.0% | — | 1650¢ | -1550¢ |
| 219 | 3Q O/U 19.5 | 1100.0% | — | 1100¢ | -1000¢ |
| 220 | O/U 61.5 | 900.0% | — | 900¢ | -800¢ |
| 221 | Rutgers vs. Wisconsin | 850.0% | $27.3K | 850¢ | -750¢ |
| 222 | Spread -1.5 | 800.0% | — | 800¢ | -700¢ |
| 223 | O/U 67.5 | 800.0% | — | 800¢ | -700¢ |
| 224 | Spread -38.5 | 750.0% | — | 750¢ | -650¢ |
| 225 | Spread -2.5 | 700.0% | $8 | 700¢ | -600¢ |
| 226 | Spread -3.5 | 545.0% | — | 545¢ | -445¢ |
| 227 | Spread -4.5 | 460.0% | — | 460¢ | -360¢ |
| 228 | 1Q O/U 16.5 | 50.0% | — | 50¢ | 50¢ |
| 229 | 1Q O/U 10.5 | 45.0% | — | 45¢ | 55¢ |
| 230 | 1Q O/U 13.5 | 45.0% | — | 45¢ | 55¢ |
| 231 | 1Q Spread -7.5 | 45.0% | — | 45¢ | 55¢ |
| 232 | 1Q O/U 19.5 | 5.0% | — | 5¢ | 95¢ |
Abrechnungsregeln
In the upcoming college football game between Rutgers and Wisconsin, scheduled for November 7 at 1:00PM ET:
This market will resolve to "Rutgers" if Rutgers win the game.
This market will resolve to "Wisconsin" if Wisconsin win the game.
Overtime is included if played.
If the game ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50.
If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50.
Handelsaktivitäten
Hier sind die Handelsaktivitäten für dieses Event.
Nov 7, 2026
- 12:27 PMYUyuyakowako$200.00
Bought 333.333332 Rutgers for Spread: Wisconsin (-21.5) at 0.6
- 09:30 AMSTstyllo$239.55
Bought 451.983147 Wisconsin for Spread: Wisconsin (-18.5) at 0.53
- 09:30 AMFEferazi$193.00
Bought 364.150944 Wisconsin for Spread: Wisconsin (-18.5) at 0.53
- 09:24 AM2H2Hots$1.00
Bought 9.09091 Rutgers for Rutgers vs. Wisconsin at 0.11
- 07:25 AM0X0xb4DD97E1C16512360a0B63B55B0e4aFd49775742-1772698329459$10.00
Bought 19.607844 Under for Rutgers vs. Wisconsin: O/U 45.5 at 0.51
- 07:22 AMCOcoulee$1.00
Bought 2.12766 Wisconsin for Spread: Wisconsin (-20.5) at 0.47
- 07:22 AMSEsetls$2.37
Bought 5.042554 Wisconsin for Spread: Wisconsin (-20.5) at 0.47
- 07:22 AM——$1.10
Bought 2.340426 Wisconsin for Spread: Wisconsin (-20.5) at 0.47
- 07:22 AMJCjcasino$213.75
Bought 395.83 Rutgers for Spread: Wisconsin (-20.5) at 0.54
- 07:17 AMNInigiri99$339.56
Bought 653 Rutgers for 1H Spread: Wisconsin (-10.5) at 0.52
- 07:09 AMMOmooseborzoi$2.50
Bought 5 Rutgers for Spread: Wisconsin (-19.5) at 0.5
- 06:19 AMBEbender187$1.00
Bought 2.12766 Wisconsin for Spread: Wisconsin (-20.5) at 0.47
Wal-Wallets, die auf dieses Event wetten
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Wie lautet der aktuelle Marktkonsens zu „Rutgers vs. Wisconsin“?
Zum letzten Stand führt 1Q O/U 7.5 mit einer Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit von 9.950%, gefolgt von 1Q Spread -2.5 mit 9.950% und 1Q Spread -3.5 mit 9.400%. Das Gesamthandelsvolumen erreicht $129,7K, was hohe Liquidität und Beteiligung signalisiert.
