
Nebraska vs. Rutgers
Kernzusammenfassung
Laut den neuesten Prognosemarktdaten zur Frage „Nebraska vs. Rutgers“ haben die Händler einen starken Konsens gebildet.
Derzeit dominiert Spread -2.5 den Markt mit einer überwältigenden Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit von 9.050%. Spread -1.5 folgt auf dem zweiten Platz mit 9.050%, während Nebraska vs. Rutgers mit 8.850% auf dem dritten Platz liegt. Das Wettvolumen dieses Marktes hat bereits $120,4K erreicht, was auf großes Interesse hindeutet.
Aufschlüsselung der Wettbewerbsstufen
Um besser einzuschätzen, wo jedes mögliche Ergebnis steht, lässt sich der Markt anhand der impliziten Wahrscheinlichkeit und der Kontraktpreise in drei Handelsstufen unterteilen:
🥇 Stufe 1: Der dominante Spitzenreiter
- Spread -2.5 (9.050%): Mit der höchsten Wahrscheinlichkeit wird Spread -2.5 vom Orderbuch stark favorisiert. Wer auf dieses Ergebnis setzen will, sieht sich einem „Buy Yes“-Kontraktpreis von 9.050¢ gegenüber – ein Zeichen hoher Marktüberzeugung.
🥈 Stufe 2: Die wichtigsten Herausforderer
- Spread -1.5 (9.050%): Als tragfähigste Alternative hält Spread -1.5 eine Wahrscheinlichkeit von 9.050%, einzutreten. Seine „Buy Yes“-Anteile werden derzeit zu 9.050¢ gehandelt.
- Nebraska vs. Rutgers (8.850%): Auf dem dritten Platz mit 8.850% Wahrscheinlichkeit zeigt der Markt eine maßvolle Skepsis gegenüber Nebraska vs. Rutgers und behandelt es als Außenseiter, sofern sich die Dynamik nicht ändert.
🥉 Stufe 3: Die Long-Tail-Optionen (zusammen ~0%)
Über die Top-3 hinaus wird ein breites Feld an Makrovariablen und Außenseiter-Ergebnissen verfolgt. Auch wenn ihre Einzelwahrscheinlichkeiten niedrig sind, bilden sie wichtige Absicherungen für spekulative Händler:
- Alternative Optionen: Dazu gehören Spread -3.5 (8.750%), Spread -4.5 (8.500%) und Spread -5.5 (8.450%).
- Spekulatives Volumen: Trotz geringer statistischer Wahrscheinlichkeit ziehen bestimmte Long-Tail-Kontrakte wie Spread -6.5 weiterhin nennenswertes Interesse an.
Umfassendes Orderbuch- & Preis-Dashboard
Die folgende Tabelle zeigt die vollständige Aufschlüsselung von Kontraktpreisen, Wahrscheinlichkeiten und Markttiefe für alle gelisteten Ergebnisse dieses Prognose-Pools:
| Rang | Vorhergesagtes Ergebnis | Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit | Handelsvolumen | Yes kaufen (Kosten) | No kaufen (Kosten) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spread -2.5 | 9050.0% | — | 9050¢ | -8950¢ |
| 2 | Spread -1.5 | 9050.0% | — | 9050¢ | -8950¢ |
| 3 | Nebraska vs. Rutgers | 8850.0% | $11.1K | 8850¢ | -8750¢ |
| 4 | Spread -3.5 | 8750.0% | — | 8750¢ | -8650¢ |
| 5 | Spread -4.5 | 8500.0% | — | 8500¢ | -8400¢ |
| 6 | Spread -5.5 | 8450.0% | — | 8450¢ | -8350¢ |
| 7 | Spread -6.5 | 8300.0% | $1.1K | 8300¢ | -8200¢ |
| 8 | Nebraska O/U 20.5 | 8100.0% | — | 8100¢ | -8000¢ |
| 9 | Spread -7.5 | 7850.0% | — | 7850¢ | -7750¢ |
| 10 | O/U 35.5 | 7650.0% | — | 7650¢ | -7550¢ |
| 11 | Spread -9.5 | 7650.0% | — | 7650¢ | -7550¢ |
| 12 | 4Q O/U 10.5 | 7550.0% | — | 7550¢ | -7450¢ |
| 13 | O/U 39.5 | 7500.0% | $120 | 7500¢ | -7400¢ |
| 14 | Spread -10.5 | 7350.0% | — | 7350¢ | -7250¢ |
| 15 | O/U 37.5 | 7350.0% | — | 7350¢ | -7250¢ |
| 16 | Nebraska O/U 23.5 | 7350.0% | $8 | 7350¢ | -7250¢ |
| 17 | Spread -11.5 | 7100.0% | — | 7100¢ | -7000¢ |
| 18 | Nebraska 1H O/U 13.5 | 7050.0% | — | 7050¢ | -6950¢ |
| 19 | 4Q O/U 7.5 | 6850.0% | — | 6850¢ | -6750¢ |
| 20 | Spread -13.5 | 6800.0% | $5 | 6800¢ | -6700¢ |
| 21 | 2Q O/U 10.5 | 6800.0% | — | 6800¢ | -6700¢ |
| 22 | Spread -14.5 | 6450.0% | $1.2K | 6450¢ | -6350¢ |
| 23 | 1Q Moneyline | 6450.0% | $28 | 6450¢ | -6350¢ |
| 24 | Spread -8.5 | 6400.0% | — | 6400¢ | -6300¢ |
| 25 | 3Q O/U 7.5 | 6400.0% | — | 6400¢ | -6300¢ |
| 26 | Spread -15.5 | 6300.0% | $12 | 6300¢ | -6200¢ |
| 27 | Spread -16.5 | 6200.0% | $15.3K | 6200¢ | -6100¢ |
| 28 | O/U 41.5 | 6200.0% | — | 6200¢ | -6100¢ |
| 29 | Spread -0.5 | 6050.0% | — | 6050¢ | -5950¢ |
| 30 | 2Q O/U 13.5 | 6000.0% | — | 6000¢ | -5900¢ |
| 31 | O/U 43.5 | 5850.0% | — | 5850¢ | -5750¢ |
| 32 | Spread -17.5 | 5700.0% | $555 | 5700¢ | -5600¢ |
| 33 | Nebraska 1H O/U 15.5 | 5500.0% | — | 5500¢ | -5400¢ |
| 34 | Spread -12.5 | 5500.0% | — | 5500¢ | -5400¢ |
| 35 | O/U 45.5 | 5350.0% | $900 | 5350¢ | -5250¢ |
| 36 | O/U 49.5 | 5350.0% | $4.7K | 5350¢ | -5250¢ |
| 37 | Spread -0.5 | 5100.0% | — | 5100¢ | -5000¢ |
| 38 | 1H O/U 24.5 | 5100.0% | — | 5100¢ | -5000¢ |
| 39 | Nebraska Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5100.0% | — | 5100¢ | -5000¢ |
| 40 | Spread -20.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 41 | Nebraska Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 42 | Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 43 | 1H O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 44 | 2H O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 45 | 2H O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 46 | 2H O/U 33.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 47 | Nebraska O/U 26.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 48 | Nebraska O/U 32.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 49 | Rutgers O/U 26.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 50 | Rutgers O/U 35.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 51 | Rutgers 1H O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 52 | Nebraska 2H O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 53 | Nebraska 2H O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 54 | Nebraska 2H O/U 15.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 55 | Rutgers 2H O/U 12.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 56 | Rutgers 2H O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 57 | Rutgers 2H O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 58 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 59 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 60 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q1 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 61 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 62 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 63 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 64 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 65 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 66 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q2 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 67 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 68 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 69 | Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 70 | Pick-Six Scored | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 71 | Nebraska vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 72 | Nebraska vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 73 | Nebraska vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 74 | Nebraska Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 75 | Nebraska Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 76 | Nebraska Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 77 | Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 78 | Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 79 | Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 80 | Nebraska Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 81 | Nebraska Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 82 | Nebraska Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 83 | Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 84 | Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 85 | Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 86 | Nebraska Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 87 | Nebraska Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 88 | Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 89 | Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 90 | Nebraska Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 91 | Nebraska Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 92 | Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 93 | Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 94 | Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 95 | Nebraska 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 96 | Nebraska 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 97 | Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 98 | Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 99 | Nebraska Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 100 | Nebraska Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 101 | Nebraska Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 102 | Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 103 | Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 104 | Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 105 | Nebraska Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 106 | Nebraska Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 107 | Nebraska Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 108 | Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 109 | Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 110 | Nebraska Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 111 | Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 112 | Nebraska Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 113 | Nebraska Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 114 | Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 115 | Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 116 | Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 117 | Nebraska vs. Rutgers: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 118 | Nebraska vs. Rutgers: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 119 | 2H Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 120 | 2Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 121 | 3Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 122 | 4Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 123 | Spread -16.5 | 4950.0% | $15.3K | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 124 | Spread -17.5 | 4950.0% | $555 | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 125 | Spread -20.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 126 | 4Q O/U 13.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 127 | Game Goes to Overtime | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 128 | 3Q O/U 10.5 | 4900.0% | — | 4900¢ | -4800¢ |
| 129 | Nebraska 1H O/U 11.5 | 4900.0% | — | 4900¢ | -4800¢ |
| 130 | 1H Moneyline | 4900.0% | — | 4900¢ | -4800¢ |
| 131 | O/U 47.5 | 4850.0% | — | 4850¢ | -4750¢ |
| 132 | Nebraska O/U 29.5 | 4850.0% | — | 4850¢ | -4750¢ |
| 133 | 2H O/U 27.5 | 4550.0% | — | 4550¢ | -4450¢ |
| 134 | 2Q O/U 16.5 | 4550.0% | — | 4550¢ | -4450¢ |
| 135 | Spread -21.5 | 4550.0% | $10 | 4550¢ | -4450¢ |
| 136 | 2Q O/U 7.5 | 4400.0% | — | 4400¢ | -4300¢ |
| 137 | Spread -18.5 | 4400.0% | — | 4400¢ | -4300¢ |
| 138 | 3Q O/U 13.5 | 4350.0% | — | 4350¢ | -4250¢ |
| 139 | Spread -19.5 | 4200.0% | — | 4200¢ | -4100¢ |
| 140 | Nebraska vs. Rutgers: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 4150.0% | — | 4150¢ | -4050¢ |
| 141 | O/U 51.5 | 3950.0% | $87.6K | 3950¢ | -3850¢ |
| 142 | Spread -8.5 | 3850.0% | — | 3850¢ | -3750¢ |
| 143 | 1Q O/U 7.5 | 3850.0% | — | 3850¢ | -3750¢ |
| 144 | Spread -24.5 | 3800.0% | — | 3800¢ | -3700¢ |
| 145 | Rutgers O/U 29.5 | 3650.0% | — | 3650¢ | -3550¢ |
| 146 | 1H O/U 27.5 | 3600.0% | $125 | 3600¢ | -3500¢ |
| 147 | Rutgers O/U 32.5 | 3600.0% | — | 3600¢ | -3500¢ |
| 148 | Spread -22.5 | 3500.0% | — | 3500¢ | -3400¢ |
| 149 | 1H O/U 33.5 | 3450.0% | — | 3450¢ | -3350¢ |
| 150 | Rutgers 1H O/U 12.5 | 3450.0% | — | 3450¢ | -3350¢ |
| 151 | O/U 53.5 | 3400.0% | $10.4K | 3400¢ | -3300¢ |
| 152 | Spread -34.5 | 3300.0% | — | 3300¢ | -3200¢ |
| 153 | 2Q O/U 19.5 | 3150.0% | — | 3150¢ | -3050¢ |
| 154 | Spread -27.5 | 3150.0% | — | 3150¢ | -3050¢ |
| 155 | 4Q O/U 16.5 | 3000.0% | — | 3000¢ | -2900¢ |
| 156 | O/U 55.5 | 2850.0% | — | 2850¢ | -2750¢ |
| 157 | O/U 59.5 | 2750.0% | — | 2750¢ | -2650¢ |
| 158 | 2H O/U 30.5 | 2650.0% | — | 2650¢ | -2550¢ |
| 159 | 1Q O/U 10.5 | 2650.0% | — | 2650¢ | -2550¢ |
| 160 | 1Q O/U 13.5 | 2550.0% | — | 2550¢ | -2450¢ |
| 161 | Rutgers O/U 23.5 | 2550.0% | — | 2550¢ | -2450¢ |
| 162 | O/U 61.5 | 2500.0% | — | 2500¢ | -2400¢ |
| 163 | Spread -28.5 | 2500.0% | — | 2500¢ | -2400¢ |
| 164 | O/U 57.5 | 2450.0% | — | 2450¢ | -2350¢ |
| 165 | 1H O/U 30.5 | 2450.0% | — | 2450¢ | -2350¢ |
| 166 | Spread -30.5 | 2450.0% | — | 2450¢ | -2350¢ |
| 167 | O/U 65.5 | 2400.0% | — | 2400¢ | -2300¢ |
| 168 | 3Q O/U 16.5 | 2350.0% | — | 2350¢ | -2250¢ |
| 169 | Spread -31.5 | 2300.0% | — | 2300¢ | -2200¢ |
| 170 | O/U 67.5 | 2150.0% | — | 2150¢ | -2050¢ |
| 171 | O/U 71.5 | 2150.0% | — | 2150¢ | -2050¢ |
| 172 | 4Q O/U 19.5 | 2150.0% | — | 2150¢ | -2050¢ |
| 173 | O/U 73.5 | 1800.0% | — | 1800¢ | -1700¢ |
| 174 | 3Q O/U 19.5 | 1800.0% | — | 1800¢ | -1700¢ |
| 175 | Spread -14.5 | 1700.0% | $1.2K | 1700¢ | -1600¢ |
| 176 | Rutgers 1H O/U 14.5 | 1400.0% | — | 1400¢ | -1300¢ |
| 177 | O/U 63.5 | 1350.0% | — | 1350¢ | -1250¢ |
| 178 | O/U 69.5 | 800.0% | — | 800¢ | -700¢ |
| 179 | Spread -1.5 | 700.0% | — | 700¢ | -600¢ |
| 180 | 1Q O/U 16.5 | 700.0% | — | 700¢ | -600¢ |
| 181 | Spread -2.5 | 650.0% | — | 650¢ | -550¢ |
| 182 | O/U 75.5 | 590.0% | — | 590¢ | -490¢ |
| 183 | Spread -3.5 | 450.0% | — | 450¢ | -350¢ |
| 184 | Spread -4.5 | 350.0% | — | 350¢ | -250¢ |
| 185 | Spread -5.5 | 300.0% | — | 300¢ | -200¢ |
| 186 | Spread -6.5 | 300.0% | $1.1K | 300¢ | -200¢ |
| 187 | 1Q O/U 19.5 | 300.0% | — | 300¢ | -200¢ |
| 188 | Spread -7.5 | 245.0% | — | 245¢ | -145¢ |
| 189 | Spread -10.5 | 135.0% | — | 135¢ | -35¢ |
| 190 | Spread -13.5 | 85.0% | $5 | 85¢ | 15¢ |
Abrechnungsregeln
In the upcoming college football game between Nebraska and Rutgers, originally scheduled for Saturday, November 14, 2026 at 12:30 PM ET (as of creation of the first market related to the event):
This market will resolve to "Nebraska" if Nebraska win the game.
This market will resolve to "Rutgers" if Rutgers win the game.
Overtime is included if played.
If the game ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50.
If this market's outcome was definitively determined under its rules by the listed resolution sources before abandonment, that outcome will stand. Otherwise, the following no-result provisions apply. If the game is canceled, does not start by Monday, November 16, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, or is abandoned with no official result by that time, this market will resolve 50-50.
Handelsaktivitäten
Hier sind die Handelsaktivitäten für dieses Event.
Nov 14, 2026
- 09:22 AMJAJAMJAMJAM4$24.00
Bought 48 Under for Nebraska vs. Rutgers: O/U 51.5 at 0.5
- 07:43 AM0X0x9e3ed7b661a903fc97afcf49e0f014ebe869f882-1783406009396$55.23
Bought 95.23 Nebraska for Spread: Nebraska (-13.5) at 0.58
- 05:58 AM0X0x0abdea0ECe95A$3.12
Bought 6.24 Under for Nebraska vs. Rutgers: O/U 51.5 at 0.5
- 05:58 AM7777ebitda77$1.95
Bought 3.9 Under for Nebraska vs. Rutgers: O/U 51.5 at 0.5
- 05:58 AMCOcoulee$5.03
Bought 10.06 Under for Nebraska vs. Rutgers: O/U 51.5 at 0.5
- 05:58 AMMRMr.Gandalf$1.00
Bought 2 Under for Nebraska vs. Rutgers: O/U 51.5 at 0.5
- 05:58 AMYOyoooogo$25.00
Bought 50 Under for Nebraska vs. Rutgers: O/U 51.5 at 0.5
- 05:58 AM——$2.00
Bought 4 Under for Nebraska vs. Rutgers: O/U 51.5 at 0.5
- 05:58 AMKEkeeptheblueflagflyinghigh$3,373.57
Bought 6747.14 Over for Nebraska vs. Rutgers: O/U 51.5 at 0.5
- 05:58 AM——$19.20
Bought 38.4 Under for Nebraska vs. Rutgers: O/U 51.5 at 0.5
- 05:58 AM0X0xdF8eDCB6864F8536A020201998C016246d9823bF-1793816033177$5.00
Bought 10 Under for Nebraska vs. Rutgers: O/U 51.5 at 0.5
- 05:58 AM——$1.00
Bought 2 Under for Nebraska vs. Rutgers: O/U 51.5 at 0.5
Wal-Wallets, die auf dieses Event wetten
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Wie lautet der aktuelle Marktkonsens zu „Nebraska vs. Rutgers“?
Zum letzten Stand führt Spread -2.5 mit einer Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit von 9.050%, gefolgt von Spread -1.5 mit 9.050% und Nebraska vs. Rutgers mit 8.850%. Das Gesamthandelsvolumen erreicht $120,4K, was hohe Liquidität und Beteiligung signalisiert.
