
CZ # posts September 25 - October 2, 2026?
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “CZ # posts September 25 - October 2, 2026?”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, <20 is dominating the market with an overwhelming 70% chance of winning. 20-39 follows in second place at 23%, while 100-119 sits in third with 1%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $3.3K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- <20 (70%): Currently commanding the highest probability, <20 is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 70¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $2.1K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- 20-39 (23%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, 20-39 maintains a 23% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 23¢.
- 100-119 (1%): Sitting in third place with a 1% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward 100-119, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~6%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes 40-59 (0.5%), 80-99 (0.5%), and 120-139 (0.5%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like 140-159 are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | <20 | 70.0% | $2.1K | 70¢ | 30¢ |
| 2 | 20-39 | 23.0% | $439 | 23¢ | 77¢ |
| 3 | 100-119 | 1.0% | $151 | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 4 | 40-59 | 0.5% | $233 | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 5 | 80-99 | 0.5% | $20 | 1¢ | 100¢ |
| 6 | 120-139 | 0.5% | $45 | 1¢ | 100¢ |
| 7 | 140-159 | 0.5% | $50 | 1¢ | 100¢ |
| 8 | 160-179 | 0.5% | $51 | 1¢ | 100¢ |
| 9 | 180-199 | 0.5% | $60 | 1¢ | 100¢ |
| 10 | 200+ | 0.5% | $43 | 1¢ | 100¢ |
| 11 | 60-79 | 0.1% | $196 | 0¢ | 100¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve according to the number of times CZ (@cz_binance), posts on X between September 25, 12:00 PM ET and October 2, 2026, 12:00 PM ET.
For the purposes of this market, only main feed posts, quote posts and reposts will count.
Replies will NOT count towards the total - however, replies which are recorded on the main feed will be counted by the tracker.
Deleted posts will count as long as they remain available long enough to be captured by the tracker (~5 minutes).
The resolution source for this market is the "Post Counter" figure for posts found at https://xtracker.polymarket.com. Individual posts can be viewed by clicking "Export Data". If the tracker does not update correctly in accordance with the rules, X itself may be used as a secondary resolution source.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome 20-39 currently trades at 23%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 1%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -22%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies 80-99 as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 0.5% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 23.3% — yielding an impressive +22.8% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include 120-139 (EV Gap: +9.8%) and 140-159 (EV Gap: +6.5%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| <20 | 70.0% | 50.7% | -19.3% |
| 20-39 | 23.0% | 1.0% | -22.0% |
| 100-119 | 1.0% | 4.9% | +3.9% |
| 40-59 | 0.5% | 6.2% | +5.7% |
| 80-99Best EV | 0.5% | 23.3% | +22.8% |
| 120-139 | 0.5% | 10.3% | +9.8% |
| 140-159 | 0.5% | 7.0% | +6.5% |
| 160-179 | 0.5% | 4.7% | +4.2% |
| 180-199 | 0.5% | 4.3% | +3.8% |
| 200+ | 0.5% | 4.4% | +3.9% |
| 60-79 | 0.1% | 1.0% | +0.9% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Sep 29, 2026
- 09:26 PMUOuo9998$5.00
Bought 5 No for Will CZ post 40-59 posts from September 25 to October 2, 2026? at 1
- 08:03 PM0X0x5F3ee9c40Be255D1C18cA38bf4Ab94b564C75337-1776862065527$17.64
Bought 21 Yes for Will CZ post 0-19 posts from September 25 to October 2, 2026? at 0.84
- 08:02 PMDRDr.PNL$39.20
Sold 46.67 Yes for Will CZ post 0-19 posts from September 25 to October 2, 2026? at 0.84
- 08:02 PMRIrichyee$7.92
Sold 9.32 Yes for Will CZ post 0-19 posts from September 25 to October 2, 2026? at 0.85
- 07:57 PMIMImSweating$17.80
Sold 20 Yes for Will CZ post 0-19 posts from September 25 to October 2, 2026? at 0.89
- 07:57 PMDEdefiance-cr$42.83
Bought 475.88 No for Will CZ post 0-19 posts from September 25 to October 2, 2026? at 0.09
- 07:57 PMJSJsonStatham$2.20
Bought 20 No for Will CZ post 0-19 posts from September 25 to October 2, 2026? at 0.11
- 07:06 PMKHkhusanov45$4.55
Sold 5 Yes for Will CZ post 0-19 posts from September 25 to October 2, 2026? at 0.91
- 06:58 PMT2T22222222222$19.33
Bought 21.720428 Yes for Will CZ post 0-19 posts from September 25 to October 2, 2026? at 0.89
- 06:58 PMBOboofa$37.60
Bought 40 Yes for Will CZ post 0-19 posts from September 25 to October 2, 2026? at 0.94
- 06:58 PM0X0x2CA$222.50
Bought 250 Yes for Will CZ post 0-19 posts from September 25 to October 2, 2026? at 0.89
- 06:09 PMBJbjprolo$0.00
Sold 8 Yes for Will CZ post 40-59 posts from September 25 to October 2, 2026? at 0
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "CZ # posts September 25 - October 2, 2026?"?
As of the latest update, <20 leads the field as the frontrunner with a 70% win probability, followed by 20-39 at 23% and 100-119 at 1%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $3.3K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags 80-99 as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 0.5% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 23.3% — an Expected Value gap of +22.8%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around 20-39. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 23%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 1%, a negative EV Gap of -22% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. 120-139 holds a positive EV Gap of +9.8%, and 140-159 shows +6.5%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
