
USC vs. Rutgers
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “USC vs. Rutgers”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, O/U 40.5 is dominating the market with an overwhelming 9,300% chance of winning. USC vs. Rutgers follows in second place at 9,220%, while O/U 46.5 sits in third with 8,150%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $142K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- O/U 40.5 (9,300%): Currently commanding the highest probability, O/U 40.5 is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 9,300¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- USC vs. Rutgers (9,220%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, USC vs. Rutgers maintains a 9,220% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 9,220¢.
- O/U 46.5 (8,150%): Sitting in third place with a 8,150% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward O/U 46.5, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~0%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes O/U 38.5 (7,700%), O/U 52.5 (7,700%), and Spread -5.5 (7,550%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like O/U 42.5 are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O/U 40.5 | 9300.0% | — | 9300¢ | -9200¢ |
| 2 | USC vs. Rutgers | 9220.0% | $66.9K | 9220¢ | -9120¢ |
| 3 | O/U 46.5 | 8150.0% | — | 8150¢ | -8050¢ |
| 4 | O/U 38.5 | 7700.0% | — | 7700¢ | -7600¢ |
| 5 | O/U 52.5 | 7700.0% | — | 7700¢ | -7600¢ |
| 6 | Spread -5.5 | 7550.0% | — | 7550¢ | -7450¢ |
| 7 | O/U 42.5 | 7500.0% | — | 7500¢ | -7400¢ |
| 8 | O/U 44.5 | 7400.0% | — | 7400¢ | -7300¢ |
| 9 | O/U 48.5 | 7050.0% | — | 7050¢ | -6950¢ |
| 10 | Spread -7.5 | 7000.0% | — | 7000¢ | -6900¢ |
| 11 | O/U 50.5 | 6900.0% | — | 6900¢ | -6800¢ |
| 12 | Spread -4.5 | 6800.0% | — | 6800¢ | -6700¢ |
| 13 | O/U 56.5 | 6600.0% | $4.7K | 6600¢ | -6500¢ |
| 14 | Spread -11.5 | 6450.0% | — | 6450¢ | -6350¢ |
| 15 | Spread -8.5 | 6450.0% | — | 6450¢ | -6350¢ |
| 16 | O/U 58.5 | 6200.0% | $36.0K | 6200¢ | -6100¢ |
| 17 | O/U 54.5 | 6000.0% | — | 6000¢ | -5900¢ |
| 18 | Spread -13.5 | 5850.0% | $11 | 5850¢ | -5750¢ |
| 19 | Spread -14.5 | 5700.0% | — | 5700¢ | -5600¢ |
| 20 | O/U 60.5 | 5550.0% | $88 | 5550¢ | -5450¢ |
| 21 | Spread -16.5 | 5300.0% | $1.5K | 5300¢ | -5200¢ |
| 22 | Spread -29.5 | 5200.0% | — | 5200¢ | -5100¢ |
| 23 | Spread -15.5 | 5200.0% | — | 5200¢ | -5100¢ |
| 24 | 1H O/U 27.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 25 | 1H O/U 30.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 26 | 2H Spread -10.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 27 | 2H Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 28 | USC O/U 5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 29 | Rutgers O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 30 | 1H Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 31 | 2Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 32 | 3Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 33 | 4Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 34 | Spread -42.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 35 | Spread -39.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 36 | Spread -36.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 37 | Spread -32.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 38 | Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 39 | 1H Spread -15.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 40 | 1H Spread -12.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 41 | 1H O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 42 | 1H O/U 33.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 43 | 1H O/U 36.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 44 | 2H Spread -13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 45 | 2H Spread -11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 46 | 2H Spread -9.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 47 | 2H Spread -8.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 48 | 2H Spread -6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 49 | 2H O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 50 | 2H O/U 26.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 51 | 2H O/U 29.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 52 | 2H O/U 32.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 53 | 2H O/U 35.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 54 | 2Q Spread -11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 55 | 2Q Spread -9.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 56 | 2Q Spread -8.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 57 | 2Q Spread -7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 58 | 2Q Spread -6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 59 | 2Q Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 60 | 2Q O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 61 | 2Q O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 62 | 2Q O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 63 | 2Q O/U 22.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 64 | 3Q Spread -9.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 65 | 3Q Spread -7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 66 | 3Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 67 | 3Q Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 68 | 3Q Spread -2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 69 | 3Q O/U 7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 70 | 3Q O/U 10.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 71 | 3Q O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 72 | 3Q O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 73 | 3Q O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 74 | 4Q Spread -9.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 75 | 4Q Spread -7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 76 | 4Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 77 | 4Q Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 78 | 4Q O/U 8.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 79 | 4Q O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 80 | 4Q O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 81 | 4Q O/U 17.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 82 | 4Q O/U 20.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 83 | USC O/U 33.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 84 | USC O/U 36.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 85 | USC O/U 39.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 86 | USC O/U 42.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 87 | USC O/U 45.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 88 | Rutgers O/U 10.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 89 | Rutgers O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 90 | Rutgers O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | $2 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 91 | Rutgers O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 92 | Rutgers O/U 22.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 93 | USC 1H O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 94 | USC 1H O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 95 | USC 1H O/U 25.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 96 | Rutgers 1H O/U 8.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 97 | Rutgers 1H O/U 10.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 98 | USC 2H O/U 18.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 99 | USC 2H O/U 20.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 100 | USC 2H O/U 22.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 101 | Rutgers 2H O/U 7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 102 | Rutgers 2H O/U 9.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 103 | Rutgers 2H O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 104 | Famah Toure: Anytime Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 105 | Dylan Lonergan: Anytime Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 106 | 1H Spread -10.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 107 | 2Q O/U 10.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 108 | 3Q Spread -6.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 109 | 4Q Spread -6.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 110 | 4Q Spread -2.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 111 | 1H Spread -17.5 | 4850.0% | — | 4850¢ | -4750¢ |
| 112 | 1H Spread -14.5 | 4850.0% | — | 4850¢ | -4750¢ |
| 113 | 1H Spread -13.5 | 4800.0% | $205 | 4800¢ | -4700¢ |
| 114 | Spread -18.5 | 4700.0% | — | 4700¢ | -4600¢ |
| 115 | Spread -19.5 | 4650.0% | $25 | 4650¢ | -4550¢ |
| 116 | Spread -35.5 | 4600.0% | — | 4600¢ | -4500¢ |
| 117 | Spread -30.5 | 4200.0% | — | 4200¢ | -4100¢ |
| 118 | O/U 64.5 | 4150.0% | $2.2K | 4150¢ | -4050¢ |
| 119 | O/U 62.5 | 4000.0% | — | 4000¢ | -3900¢ |
| 120 | Spread -22.5 | 3850.0% | $5.3K | 3850¢ | -3750¢ |
| 121 | O/U 66.5 | 3500.0% | $45 | 3500¢ | -3400¢ |
| 122 | Spread -26.5 | 3350.0% | — | 3350¢ | -3250¢ |
| 123 | Spread -17.5 | 3350.0% | $25 | 3350¢ | -3250¢ |
| 124 | O/U 68.5 | 3350.0% | — | 3350¢ | -3250¢ |
| 125 | Spread -25.5 | 3300.0% | — | 3300¢ | -3200¢ |
| 126 | Spread -28.5 | 3150.0% | — | 3150¢ | -3050¢ |
| 127 | Spread -20.5 | 3150.0% | $4.3K | 3150¢ | -3050¢ |
| 128 | O/U 72.5 | 3100.0% | — | 3100¢ | -3000¢ |
| 129 | O/U 74.5 | 3000.0% | — | 3000¢ | -2900¢ |
| 130 | O/U 78.5 | 2950.0% | — | 2950¢ | -2850¢ |
| 131 | Spread -24.5 | 2700.0% | $718 | 2700¢ | -2600¢ |
| 132 | O/U 76.5 | 2700.0% | — | 2700¢ | -2600¢ |
| 133 | Spread -27.5 | 2650.0% | — | 2650¢ | -2550¢ |
| 134 | Spread -21.5 | 2500.0% | $29.1K | 2500¢ | -2400¢ |
| 135 | O/U 70.5 | 2300.0% | — | 2300¢ | -2200¢ |
| 136 | Spread -23.5 | 2000.0% | $2.2K | 2000¢ | -1900¢ |
| 137 | Spread -38.5 | 1600.0% | — | 1600¢ | -1500¢ |
Result Rules
In the upcoming college football game between USC and Rutgers, scheduled for September 19 at 3:30PM ET:
This market will resolve to "USC" if USC win the game.
This market will resolve to "Rutgers" if Rutgers win the game.
Overtime is included if played.
If the game ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50.
If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50.
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Sep 19, 2026
- 07:09 AMWRwrldcup$80.00
Bought 160 USC for Spread: USC (-21.5) at 0.5
- 07:00 AMGOGolftango$50.00
Bought 87.719297 Under for USC vs. Rutgers: O/U 60.5 at 0.57
- 06:59 AMGOGolftango$49.98
Bought 98 Rutgers for Spread: USC (-21.5) at 0.51
- 04:18 AMDBdbgisit$18.00
Bought 34.615385 Rutgers for Spread: USC (-21.5) at 0.52
- 04:15 AMDBdbgisit$90.00
Bought 176.470589 Rutgers for Spread: USC (-21.5) at 0.51
- 04:07 AMDSDsl007007$1.40
Bought 2.8 Over for USC vs. Rutgers: O/U 58.5 at 0.5
- 04:06 AMWRwr0ngw4yb3tt0r$98.00
Bought 200 Over for USC vs. Rutgers: O/U 58.5 at 0.49
- 03:45 AMDFDFY$10.00
Bought 20 USC for Spread: USC (-21.5) at 0.5
Sep 17, 2026
- 09:23 PMCAcaspar1248$0.85
Bought 12.17 Rutgers for USC vs. Rutgers at 0.07
- 08:47 PMCAcaspar1248$0.58
Bought 7.3 Rutgers for USC vs. Rutgers at 0.08
- 08:47 PMCAcaspar1248$1.65
Bought 23.625 Rutgers for USC vs. Rutgers at 0.07
- 08:46 PMCAcaspar1248$1.65
Bought 23.571429 Rutgers for USC vs. Rutgers at 0.07
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "USC vs. Rutgers"?
As of the latest update, O/U 40.5 leads the field as the frontrunner with a 9,300% win probability, followed by USC vs. Rutgers at 9,220% and O/U 46.5 at 8,150%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $142K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
