
UNLV vs. Akron
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “UNLV vs. Akron”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, O/U 34.5 is dominating the market with an overwhelming 9,260% chance of winning. O/U 30.5 follows in second place at 9,250%, while O/U 32.5 sits in third with 9,250%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $640.6K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- O/U 34.5 (9,260%): Currently commanding the highest probability, O/U 34.5 is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 9,260¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- O/U 30.5 (9,250%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, O/U 30.5 maintains a 9,250% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 9,250¢.
- O/U 32.5 (9,250%): Sitting in third place with a 9,250% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward O/U 32.5, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~0%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes 1H O/U 23.5 (9,150%), 2Q O/U 8.5 (9,050%), and Akron 1H O/U 7.5 (9,050%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Akron 1H O/U 9.5 are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O/U 34.5 | 9260.0% | — | 9260¢ | -9160¢ |
| 2 | O/U 30.5 | 9250.0% | — | 9250¢ | -9150¢ |
| 3 | O/U 32.5 | 9250.0% | — | 9250¢ | -9150¢ |
| 4 | 1H O/U 23.5 | 9150.0% | — | 9150¢ | -9050¢ |
| 5 | 2Q O/U 8.5 | 9050.0% | — | 9050¢ | -8950¢ |
| 6 | Akron 1H O/U 7.5 | 9050.0% | — | 9050¢ | -8950¢ |
| 7 | Akron 1H O/U 9.5 | 9050.0% | — | 9050¢ | -8950¢ |
| 8 | O/U 36.5 | 9000.0% | — | 9000¢ | -8900¢ |
| 9 | O/U 40.5 | 8500.0% | $24 | 8500¢ | -8400¢ |
| 10 | UNLV vs. Akron | 8450.0% | $311.8K | 8450¢ | -8350¢ |
| 11 | Spread -3.5 | 7550.0% | — | 7550¢ | -7450¢ |
| 12 | O/U 38.5 | 7500.0% | — | 7500¢ | -7400¢ |
| 13 | O/U 42.5 | 7000.0% | — | 7000¢ | -6900¢ |
| 14 | O/U 44.5 | 6950.0% | — | 6950¢ | -6850¢ |
| 15 | Spread -5.5 | 6900.0% | $2.3K | 6900¢ | -6800¢ |
| 16 | O/U 46.5 | 6650.0% | — | 6650¢ | -6550¢ |
| 17 | O/U 48.5 | 6500.0% | — | 6500¢ | -6400¢ |
| 18 | Spread -6.5 | 6450.0% | $2.1K | 6450¢ | -6350¢ |
| 19 | Spread -7.5 | 5800.0% | $2.1K | 5800¢ | -5700¢ |
| 20 | Spread -8.5 | 5600.0% | — | 5600¢ | -5500¢ |
| 21 | Spread -9.5 | 5550.0% | $843 | 5550¢ | -5450¢ |
| 22 | Spread -12.5 | 5450.0% | $20.7K | 5450¢ | -5350¢ |
| 23 | O/U 50.5 | 5200.0% | $264 | 5200¢ | -5100¢ |
| 24 | Spread -31.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 25 | Spread -28.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 26 | 1H Spread -11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 27 | 1H Spread -8.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 28 | 1H O/U 26.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 29 | 1H O/U 29.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 30 | 1H O/U 32.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 31 | 2H Spread -9.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 32 | 2H Spread -7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 33 | 2H Spread -6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 34 | 2H Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 35 | 2H Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 36 | 2H Spread -2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 37 | 2H O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 38 | 2H O/U 22.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 39 | 2H O/U 25.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 40 | 2H O/U 28.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 41 | 2H O/U 31.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 42 | 2Q Spread -7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 43 | 2Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 44 | 2Q Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 45 | 2Q Spread -3.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 46 | 2Q Spread -2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 47 | 2Q Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 48 | 2Q O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 49 | 2Q O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 50 | 2Q O/U 17.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 51 | 2Q O/U 20.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 52 | 3Q Spread -7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 53 | 3Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 54 | 3Q Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 55 | 3Q Spread -3.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 56 | 3Q Spread -2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 57 | 3Q Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 58 | 3Q O/U 4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 59 | 3Q O/U 7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 60 | 3Q O/U 10.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 61 | 3Q O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 62 | 3Q O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 63 | 4Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 64 | 4Q Spread -3.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 65 | 4Q Spread -2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 66 | 4Q Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 67 | 4Q Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 68 | 4Q Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 69 | 4Q O/U 7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 70 | 4Q O/U 10.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 71 | 4Q O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 72 | 4Q O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 73 | 4Q O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 74 | UNLV O/U 25.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 75 | UNLV O/U 28.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 76 | UNLV O/U 31.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 77 | UNLV O/U 34.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 78 | UNLV O/U 37.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 79 | Akron O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 80 | Akron O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 81 | Akron O/U 17.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 82 | Akron O/U 20.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 83 | Akron O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 84 | UNLV 1H O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 85 | UNLV 1H O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 86 | UNLV 1H O/U 18.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 87 | Akron 1H O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 88 | UNLV 2H O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 89 | UNLV 2H O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 90 | UNLV 2H O/U 18.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 91 | Akron 2H O/U 7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 92 | Akron 2H O/U 9.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 93 | Akron 2H O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 94 | 2H Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 95 | UNLV O/U 3.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 96 | Akron O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 97 | 1H Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 98 | 2Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 99 | 3Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 100 | 4Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 101 | UNLV O/U 4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 102 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 103 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 104 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 105 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 106 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 107 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 108 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 109 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q2 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 110 | Game Goes to Overtime | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 111 | UNLV vs. Akron: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 112 | Pick-Six Scored | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 113 | Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 114 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 115 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 116 | UNLV vs. Akron: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 117 | UNLV vs. Akron: Total Touchdowns O/U 7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 118 | UNLV Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 119 | UNLV Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 120 | UNLV Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 121 | Akron Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 122 | Akron Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 123 | Akron Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 124 | UNLV Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 125 | UNLV Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 126 | UNLV Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 127 | Akron Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 128 | Akron Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 129 | Akron Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 130 | UNLV Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 131 | UNLV Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 132 | UNLV Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 133 | Akron Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 134 | Akron Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 135 | Akron Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 136 | UNLV Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 137 | UNLV Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 138 | UNLV Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 139 | Akron Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 140 | Akron Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 141 | Akron Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 142 | UNLV 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 143 | UNLV 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 144 | Akron 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 145 | Akron 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 146 | UNLV Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 147 | UNLV Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 148 | UNLV Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 149 | Akron Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 150 | Akron Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 151 | Akron Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 152 | UNLV Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 153 | UNLV Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 154 | UNLV Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 155 | Akron Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 156 | Akron Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 157 | Akron Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 158 | UNLV Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 159 | UNLV Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 160 | UNLV Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 161 | Akron Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 162 | Akron Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 163 | Akron Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 164 | UNLV vs. Akron: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 165 | UNLV vs. Akron: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 166 | UNLV vs. Akron: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 167 | Spread -34.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 168 | Spread -10.5 | 4950.0% | $4.6K | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 169 | Spread -0.5 | 4950.0% | $1 | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 170 | Spread -0.5 | 4950.0% | $1 | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 171 | 1H Spread -9.5 | 4950.0% | $30 | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 172 | 1H Spread -7.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 173 | 1H Spread -6.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 174 | 1H Spread -4.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 175 | Spread -6.5 | 4500.0% | $2.1K | 4500¢ | -4400¢ |
| 176 | O/U 52.5 | 4450.0% | $11.9K | 4450¢ | -4350¢ |
| 177 | Spread -11.5 | 4250.0% | $9.1K | 4250¢ | -4150¢ |
| 178 | Spread -2.5 | 4150.0% | — | 4150¢ | -4050¢ |
| 179 | Spread -15.5 | 4100.0% | $63 | 4100¢ | -4000¢ |
| 180 | Spread -13.5 | 4000.0% | $259.1K | 4000¢ | -3900¢ |
| 181 | O/U 54.5 | 3800.0% | $1.8K | 3800¢ | -3700¢ |
| 182 | Spread -18.5 | 3650.0% | — | 3650¢ | -3550¢ |
| 183 | Spread -19.5 | 3550.0% | — | 3550¢ | -3450¢ |
| 184 | Spread -14.5 | 3350.0% | $10.2K | 3350¢ | -3250¢ |
| 185 | Spread -22.5 | 3300.0% | — | 3300¢ | -3200¢ |
| 186 | Spread -17.5 | 3250.0% | — | 3250¢ | -3150¢ |
| 187 | Spread -16.5 | 3200.0% | — | 3200¢ | -3100¢ |
| 188 | O/U 56.5 | 3200.0% | $114 | 3200¢ | -3100¢ |
| 189 | O/U 58.5 | 2600.0% | $3.4K | 2600¢ | -2500¢ |
| 190 | O/U 60.5 | 2450.0% | — | 2450¢ | -2350¢ |
| 191 | O/U 62.5 | 1950.0% | — | 1950¢ | -1850¢ |
| 192 | Spread -27.5 | 1900.0% | $1 | 1900¢ | -1800¢ |
| 193 | Spread -20.5 | 1900.0% | — | 1900¢ | -1800¢ |
| 194 | O/U 70.5 | 1550.0% | — | 1550¢ | -1450¢ |
| 195 | Spread -3.5 | 1500.0% | — | 1500¢ | -1400¢ |
| 196 | Spread -21.5 | 1400.0% | $1 | 1400¢ | -1300¢ |
| 197 | O/U 68.5 | 1400.0% | — | 1400¢ | -1300¢ |
| 198 | O/U 64.5 | 1350.0% | — | 1350¢ | -1250¢ |
| 199 | O/U 66.5 | 1200.0% | — | 1200¢ | -1100¢ |
| 200 | Spread -24.5 | 850.0% | $79 | 850¢ | -750¢ |
| 201 | Spread -30.5 | 650.0% | $1 | 650¢ | -550¢ |
Result Rules
In the upcoming college football game between UNLV and Akron, scheduled for September 26 at 12:00PM ET:
This market will resolve to "UNLV" if UNLV win the game.
This market will resolve to "Akron" if Akron win the game.
Overtime is included if played.
If the game ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50.
If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50.
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Sep 26, 2026
- 09:18 AMLULucap230$1.00
Bought 1.204817 UNLV for UNLV vs. Akron at 0.83
- 08:43 AMMOmooseborzoi$13.82
Bought 28.21 UNLV for Spread: UNLV (-13.5) at 0.49
- 08:39 AMHEHerdonia$5.01
Bought 27.833334 Akron for UNLV vs. Akron at 0.18
- 08:20 AM0X0x536BF634C2E5806BD0B605A689c4C1DD5461a977-1776159446879$4.56
Bought 8.769231 Akron for Spread: UNLV (-13.5) at 0.52
- 07:24 AMLElee1991$1.00
Bought 1.204817 UNLV for UNLV vs. Akron at 0.83
- 06:55 AMRAraju1980xyz$20.00
Bought 24.096382 Over for UNLV vs. Akron: O/U 40.5 at 0.83
- 06:00 AMNZnzfighter$1.00
Bought 5.555556 Akron for UNLV vs. Akron at 0.18
- 04:59 AM0X0x3554Ad1Aa2A6EDC209DF0dF284AFfc68C3ED01f5-1763319459872$5.88
Sold 11.53 UNLV for Spread: UNLV (-12.5) at 0.51
- 04:29 AMBUBuzz12z$17.29
Bought 35.285715 UNLV for Spread: UNLV (-13.5) at 0.49
- 04:15 AMTCtcjoness$18.75
Bought 78.125 UNLV for Spread: UNLV (-24.5) at 0.24
- 04:10 AMMYMysaenn$4.90
Bought 10 UNLV for Spread: UNLV (-13.5) at 0.49
- 04:02 AMCHcharay12$15.68
Bought 32 UNLV for Spread: UNLV (-13.5) at 0.49
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "UNLV vs. Akron"?
As of the latest update, O/U 34.5 leads the field as the frontrunner with a 9,260% win probability, followed by O/U 30.5 at 9,250% and O/U 32.5 at 9,250%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $640.6K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
