Syracuse vs. Pittsburgh

$229.8K Vol
Sep 18, 2026
Active
Probability Trend
Pittsburgh 91.8%
Syracuse 8.3%

Core Summary

According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Syracuse vs. Pittsburgh”, traders have formed a strong consensus.

Currently, Mason Heintschel: Anytime Touchdown is dominating the market with an overwhelming 17% chance of winning. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $229.8K, reflecting intense industry interest.

Breakdown of Competitive Tiers

To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:

🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader

  • Mason Heintschel: Anytime Touchdown (17%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Mason Heintschel: Anytime Touchdown is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 17¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $5 in volume.

Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard

The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:

RankPredicted OutcomeWin ProbabilityTrading VolumeBuy Yes (Cost)Buy No (Cost)
1Mason Heintschel: Anytime Touchdown17.0%$517¢83¢

Result Rules

In the upcoming college football game between Syracuse and Pittsburgh, scheduled for September 17 at 7:30PM ET:

This market will resolve to "Syracuse" if Syracuse win the game.

This market will resolve to "Pittsburgh" if Pittsburgh win the game.

Overtime is included if played.

If the game ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50.

If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.

If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50.

AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps

While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.

Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.

Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities

Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:

  • The Most Overvalued Outcome Mason Heintschel: Anytime Touchdown currently trades at 17%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 1%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -16%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
MarketTrade ValueFair ValueEV Gap
Mason Heintschel: Anytime Touchdown17.0%1.0%-16.0%

Trade Activities

Here is the trade activities for this event.

Sep 17, 2026

  • 10:43 PM
    NInigiri99
    $96.20

    Bought 370 Syracuse for Syracuse vs. Pittsburgh: 1H Moneyline at 0.26

  • 10:16 PM
    0X0xE91171f655bE1568e4c63f29663c0028649e3d4e-1765651946286
    $128.39

    Bought 329.2 Over for Syracuse Total Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 at 0.39

  • 10:16 PM
    DIdips.
    $96.33

    Bought 247 Over for Syracuse Total Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 at 0.39

  • 10:16 PM
    DIdips.
    $96.33

    Bought 247 Over for Syracuse Total Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 at 0.39

  • 10:00 PM
    $90.27

    Bought 177 Syracuse for Spread: Pittsburgh (-10.5) at 0.51

  • 09:58 PM
    TCtcjoness
    $9.63

    Bought 24.692308 Over for Syracuse Total Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 at 0.39

  • 09:56 PM
    0X0x79Af6c69b46b0579e9217639Ba890009a9B5b720-1774897669407
    $20.00

    Bought 39.215687 Syracuse for Spread: Pittsburgh (-10.5) at 0.51

  • 09:54 PM
    $338.55

    Bought 555 Under for Syracuse Total Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 at 0.61

  • 09:54 PM
    DIdips.
    $81.90

    Bought 210 Over for Syracuse Total Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 at 0.39

  • 09:37 PM
    ALalexma11224
    $7.00

    Bought 14 Pittsburgh for Spread: Pittsburgh (-10.5) at 0.5

  • 09:37 PM
    0X0xB4a74b902c84F093f199853EB5A0e7F38805809B-1765392751613
    $2.86

    Sold 13.63 Syracuse for Syracuse vs. Pittsburgh at 0.21

  • 09:34 PM
    CHcharay12
    $7.65

    Bought 15.3 Pittsburgh for Spread: Pittsburgh (-10.5) at 0.5

Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event

JA1
JAMJAMJAM4
Event PnL
-$20.00
Volume
$4,000.00
Positions
Pittsburgh
GA2
gawtaiuwty028wa3r
Event PnL
+$16.08
Volume
$3,215.28
Positions
Syracuse
MO3
mooseborzoi
Event PnL
-$17.15
Volume
$2,800.99
Positions
SyracuseSyracuseUnder
814
0x81f3…1f2a
Event PnL
+$10.01
Volume
$2,000.00
Positions
Pittsburgh
DI5
dinimami
Event PnL
-$17.02
Volume
$1,451.12
Positions
Syracuse
MI6
mikesports
Event PnL
+$5.71
Volume
$1,140.32
Positions
Pittsburgh
GA7
gagarin59
Event PnL
+$14.53
Volume
$946.21
Positions
PittsburghSyracuse
388
38791873984189
Event PnL
+$5.58
Volume
$515.76
Positions
PittsburghPittsburgh

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current market consensus on "Syracuse vs. Pittsburgh"?

As of the latest update, Mason Heintschel: Anytime Touchdown leads the field as the frontrunner with a 17% win probability. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $229.8K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.

How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?

The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.

Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?

Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Mason Heintschel: Anytime Touchdown. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 17%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 1%, a negative EV Gap of -16% that signals the contract is overpriced.

Get Started