Georgia Tech vs. Stanford
$95.4K Vol
Sep 27, 2026
Active
Probability Trend
Georgia Tech 58.5%
Stanford 41.5%
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Georgia Tech vs. Stanford”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, O/U 28.5 is dominating the market with an overwhelming 9,200% chance of winning. O/U 30.5 follows in second place at 9,100%, while O/U 32.5 sits in third with 8,600%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $95.4K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- O/U 28.5 (9,200%): Currently commanding the highest probability, O/U 28.5 is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 9,200¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- O/U 30.5 (9,100%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, O/U 30.5 maintains a 9,100% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 9,100¢.
- O/U 32.5 (8,600%): Sitting in third place with a 8,600% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward O/U 32.5, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~0%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes O/U 34.5 (8,600%), O/U 36.5 (8,250%), and O/U 38.5 (7,550%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like 2Q O/U 7.5 are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O/U 28.5 | 9200.0% | — | 9200¢ | -9100¢ |
| 2 | O/U 30.5 | 9100.0% | — | 9100¢ | -9000¢ |
| 3 | O/U 32.5 | 8600.0% | — | 8600¢ | -8500¢ |
| 4 | O/U 34.5 | 8600.0% | — | 8600¢ | -8500¢ |
| 5 | O/U 36.5 | 8250.0% | — | 8250¢ | -8150¢ |
| 6 | O/U 38.5 | 7550.0% | — | 7550¢ | -7450¢ |
| 7 | 2Q O/U 7.5 | 7400.0% | — | 7400¢ | -7300¢ |
| 8 | Georgia Tech O/U 19.5 | 7350.0% | — | 7350¢ | -7250¢ |
| 9 | O/U 40.5 | 7300.0% | — | 7300¢ | -7200¢ |
| 10 | Stanford O/U 16.5 | 7300.0% | — | 7300¢ | -7200¢ |
| 11 | 4Q O/U 7.5 | 7000.0% | — | 7000¢ | -6900¢ |
| 12 | O/U 42.5 | 6800.0% | — | 6800¢ | -6700¢ |
| 13 | Stanford O/U 19.5 | 6550.0% | — | 6550¢ | -6450¢ |
| 14 | O/U 44.5 | 6250.0% | — | 6250¢ | -6150¢ |
| 15 | Georgia Tech vs. Stanford | 5850.0% | $25.5K | 5850¢ | -5750¢ |
| 16 | 2Q O/U 10.5 | 5850.0% | — | 5850¢ | -5750¢ |
| 17 | Spread -0.5 | 5800.0% | — | 5800¢ | -5700¢ |
| 18 | O/U 46.5 | 5700.0% | — | 5700¢ | -5600¢ |
| 19 | 1H Moneyline | 5700.0% | — | 5700¢ | -5600¢ |
| 20 | Spread -1.5 | 5650.0% | $111 | 5650¢ | -5550¢ |
| 21 | 4Q O/U 10.5 | 5500.0% | — | 5500¢ | -5400¢ |
| 22 | 1Q O/U 9.5 | 5400.0% | — | 5400¢ | -5300¢ |
| 23 | Spread -2.5 | 5350.0% | $195 | 5350¢ | -5250¢ |
| 24 | 2H O/U 30.5 | 5350.0% | — | 5350¢ | -5250¢ |
| 25 | Georgia Tech 1H O/U 12.5 | 5300.0% | $19 | 5300¢ | -5200¢ |
| 26 | 1H Spread -0.5 | 5150.0% | — | 5150¢ | -5050¢ |
| 27 | 2H O/U 27.5 | 5150.0% | — | 5150¢ | -5050¢ |
| 28 | 2Q O/U 13.5 | 5150.0% | — | 5150¢ | -5050¢ |
| 29 | O/U 48.5 | 5050.0% | $13.4K | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 30 | 2H Spread -1.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 31 | 2H O/U 18.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 32 | 2H O/U 21.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 33 | 2H O/U 24.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 34 | 4Q O/U 13.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 35 | 2H Moneyline | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 36 | 3Q Moneyline | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 37 | Georgia Tech Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 38 | Spread -24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 39 | Spread -18.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 40 | Spread -12.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 41 | 1H Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 42 | 1H O/U 18.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 43 | 1H O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 44 | 2H Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 45 | 2H Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 46 | 2H Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 47 | 1Q Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 48 | 1Q Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 49 | 1Q Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 50 | 1Q O/U 3.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 51 | 1Q O/U 6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 52 | 1Q O/U 15.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 53 | 2Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 54 | 2Q Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 55 | 2Q Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 56 | 2Q Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 57 | 3Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 58 | 3Q Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 59 | 3Q Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 60 | 3Q Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 61 | 3Q O/U 3.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 62 | 3Q O/U 6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 63 | 3Q O/U 9.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 64 | 3Q O/U 15.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 65 | 4Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 66 | 4Q Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 67 | 4Q Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 68 | 4Q Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 69 | Georgia Tech O/U 22.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 70 | Georgia Tech O/U 25.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 71 | Georgia Tech O/U 28.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 72 | Georgia Tech O/U 31.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 73 | Stanford O/U 22.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 74 | Stanford O/U 25.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 75 | Stanford O/U 28.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 76 | Georgia Tech 1H O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 77 | Georgia Tech 1H O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 78 | Stanford 1H O/U 8.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 79 | Stanford 1H O/U 12.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 80 | Georgia Tech 2H O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 81 | Georgia Tech 2H O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 82 | Georgia Tech 2H O/U 15.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 83 | Stanford 2H O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 84 | Stanford 2H O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 85 | Georgia Tech O/U 3.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 86 | Stanford O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 87 | 2Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 88 | 4Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 89 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 90 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 91 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 92 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 93 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 94 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 95 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q1 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 96 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 97 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q2 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 98 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 99 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 100 | Game Goes to Overtime | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 101 | Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 102 | Pick-Six Scored | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 103 | Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Touchdowns O/U 4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 104 | Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 105 | Georgia Tech Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 106 | Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 107 | Georgia Tech Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 108 | Stanford Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 109 | Georgia Tech Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 110 | Stanford Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 111 | Stanford Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 112 | Georgia Tech Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 113 | Georgia Tech Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 114 | Georgia Tech Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 115 | Stanford Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 116 | Stanford Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 117 | Georgia Tech Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 118 | Georgia Tech Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 119 | Georgia Tech Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 120 | Stanford Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 121 | Stanford Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 122 | Stanford Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 123 | Stanford Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 124 | Georgia Tech Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 125 | Georgia Tech Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 126 | Stanford Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 127 | Georgia Tech Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 128 | Stanford Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 129 | Stanford Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 130 | Georgia Tech 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 131 | Georgia Tech 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 132 | Stanford 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 133 | Stanford 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 134 | Georgia Tech Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 135 | Georgia Tech Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 136 | Georgia Tech Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 137 | Stanford Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 138 | Stanford Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 139 | Stanford Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 140 | Georgia Tech Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 141 | Stanford Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 142 | Georgia Tech Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 143 | Stanford Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 144 | Stanford Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 145 | Georgia Tech Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 146 | Georgia Tech Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 147 | Georgia Tech Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 148 | Stanford Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 149 | Stanford Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 150 | Stanford Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 151 | Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 152 | Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 153 | Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 154 | 2H Spread -2.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 155 | Stanford 2H O/U 9.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 156 | 2H Spread -3.5 | 4900.0% | — | 4900¢ | -4800¢ |
| 157 | 1H Spread -2.5 | 4850.0% | — | 4850¢ | -4750¢ |
| 158 | 1H O/U 24.5 | 4800.0% | — | 4800¢ | -4700¢ |
| 159 | Stanford 1H O/U 10.5 | 4700.0% | — | 4700¢ | -4600¢ |
| 160 | Spread -3.5 | 4550.0% | $30 | 4550¢ | -4450¢ |
| 161 | O/U 50.5 | 4550.0% | — | 4550¢ | -4450¢ |
| 162 | 1Q Spread -0.5 | 4450.0% | — | 4450¢ | -4350¢ |
| 163 | 2Q Spread -2.5 | 4300.0% | — | 4300¢ | -4200¢ |
| 164 | Spread -4.5 | 4250.0% | $20 | 4250¢ | -4150¢ |
| 165 | Spread -0.5 | 4200.0% | — | 4200¢ | -4100¢ |
| 166 | 1Q O/U 12.5 | 4200.0% | — | 4200¢ | -4100¢ |
| 167 | Spread -5.5 | 4150.0% | $200 | 4150¢ | -4050¢ |
| 168 | 1H Spread -3.5 | 4150.0% | — | 4150¢ | -4050¢ |
| 169 | O/U 52.5 | 4050.0% | — | 4050¢ | -3950¢ |
| 170 | 3Q O/U 12.5 | 4050.0% | — | 4050¢ | -3950¢ |
| 171 | 1H Spread -1.5 | 3950.0% | — | 3950¢ | -3850¢ |
| 172 | Spread -6.5 | 3900.0% | $35 | 3900¢ | -3800¢ |
| 173 | Spread -1.5 | 3850.0% | $111 | 3850¢ | -3750¢ |
| 174 | 4Q Spread -2.5 | 3850.0% | — | 3850¢ | -3750¢ |
| 175 | 4Q O/U 16.5 | 3850.0% | — | 3850¢ | -3750¢ |
| 176 | 2Q O/U 16.5 | 3800.0% | — | 3800¢ | -3700¢ |
| 177 | 2Q Spread -3.5 | 3700.0% | — | 3700¢ | -3600¢ |
| 178 | 1H Spread -5.5 | 3600.0% | — | 3600¢ | -3500¢ |
| 179 | 1H O/U 27.5 | 3600.0% | — | 3600¢ | -3500¢ |
| 180 | 3Q Spread -2.5 | 3600.0% | — | 3600¢ | -3500¢ |
| 181 | O/U 54.5 | 3550.0% | — | 3550¢ | -3450¢ |
| 182 | 4Q Spread -3.5 | 3550.0% | — | 3550¢ | -3450¢ |
| 183 | Spread -2.5 | 3500.0% | $195 | 3500¢ | -3400¢ |
| 184 | 1Q Spread -3.5 | 3450.0% | — | 3450¢ | -3350¢ |
| 185 | Spread -7.5 | 3350.0% | $1 | 3350¢ | -3250¢ |
| 186 | 3Q Spread -3.5 | 3250.0% | — | 3250¢ | -3150¢ |
| 187 | Spread -8.5 | 3150.0% | — | 3150¢ | -3050¢ |
| 188 | O/U 56.5 | 3150.0% | — | 3150¢ | -3050¢ |
| 189 | 2Q O/U 19.5 | 3000.0% | — | 3000¢ | -2900¢ |
| 190 | 1Q Moneyline | 3000.0% | — | 3000¢ | -2900¢ |
| 191 | Spread -9.5 | 2950.0% | $30 | 2950¢ | -2850¢ |
| 192 | Spread -3.5 | 2950.0% | $30 | 2950¢ | -2850¢ |
| 193 | 4Q O/U 19.5 | 2950.0% | — | 2950¢ | -2850¢ |
| 194 | Spread -4.5 | 2750.0% | $20 | 2750¢ | -2650¢ |
| 195 | 1H O/U 30.5 | 2700.0% | — | 2700¢ | -2600¢ |
| 196 | Spread -10.5 | 2650.0% | $142 | 2650¢ | -2550¢ |
| 197 | O/U 58.5 | 2550.0% | — | 2550¢ | -2450¢ |
| 198 | Spread -12.5 | 2450.0% | — | 2450¢ | -2350¢ |
| 199 | Spread -11.5 | 2450.0% | $275 | 2450¢ | -2350¢ |
| 200 | Spread -6.5 | 2450.0% | $35 | 2450¢ | -2350¢ |
| 201 | O/U 60.5 | 2050.0% | — | 2050¢ | -1950¢ |
| 202 | Spread -14.5 | 1900.0% | $30 | 1900¢ | -1800¢ |
| 203 | O/U 62.5 | 1850.0% | — | 1850¢ | -1750¢ |
| 204 | 1Q Spread -3.5 | 1750.0% | — | 1750¢ | -1650¢ |
| 205 | Spread -9.5 | 1600.0% | $30 | 1600¢ | -1500¢ |
| 206 | Spread -10.5 | 1550.0% | $142 | 1550¢ | -1450¢ |
| 207 | O/U 64.5 | 1400.0% | — | 1400¢ | -1300¢ |
| 208 | Spread -17.5 | 1350.0% | $195 | 1350¢ | -1250¢ |
| 209 | Spread -13.5 | 1250.0% | — | 1250¢ | -1150¢ |
| 210 | O/U 66.5 | 1200.0% | — | 1200¢ | -1100¢ |
| 211 | O/U 68.5 | 1050.0% | — | 1050¢ | -950¢ |
| 212 | Spread -20.5 | 1000.0% | $117 | 1000¢ | -900¢ |
| 213 | Spread -16.5 | 900.0% | — | 900¢ | -800¢ |
| 214 | Spread -21.5 | 850.0% | — | 850¢ | -750¢ |
Result Rules
In the upcoming college football game between Georgia Tech and Stanford, scheduled for September 26 at 10:30PM ET:
This market will resolve to "Georgia Tech" if Georgia Tech win the game.
This market will resolve to "Stanford" if Stanford win the game.
Overtime is included if played.
If the game ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50.
If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50.
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Sep 26, 2026
- 07:18 AMPUpurplegatto$24.40
Bought 40 Georgia Tech for Georgia Tech vs. Stanford at 0.61
- 06:45 AMMOmooseborzoi$5.04
Bought 10.07 Under for Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: O/U 48.5 at 0.5
- 06:41 AMMOmooseborzoi$19.65
Bought 39.29 Under for Georgia Tech vs. Stanford: O/U 48.5 at 0.5
- 06:05 AMGAGated$30.00
Bought 62.5 Georgia Tech for Spread: Georgia Tech (-3.5) at 0.48
- 05:10 AMSUsuperlxj$30.21
Bought 57 Stanford for Spread: Georgia Tech (-3.5) at 0.53
- 05:10 AMRARangerrick42$48.00
Bought 100 Georgia Tech for Spread: Georgia Tech (-3.5) at 0.48
- 04:59 AMHEHerdonia$23.59
Bought 58.975 Stanford for Georgia Tech vs. Stanford at 0.4
- 04:53 AM——$295.16
Bought 483.868853 Georgia Tech for Georgia Tech vs. Stanford at 0.61
- 04:51 AMUPUpTheBlues$5.10
Bought 30 Stanford for Spread: Stanford (-9.5) at 0.17
- 04:51 AMUPUpTheBlues$7.20
Bought 30 Stanford for Spread: Stanford (-6.5) at 0.24
- 04:51 AMUPUpTheBlues$39.62
Bought 141.5 Georgia Tech for Spread: Georgia Tech (-10.5) at 0.28
- 04:51 AMUPUpTheBlues$50.70
Bought 195 Georgia Tech for Spread: Georgia Tech (-11.5) at 0.26
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
WR1
wr0ngw4yb3tt0rEvent PnL
+$146.58
Volume
$36,662.63
Positions
StanfordStanfordStanford
TE2
texaskidEvent PnL
+$33.56
Volume
$33,430.14
Positions
StanfordStanford
HO3
HomeRunHazardEvent PnL
-$42.96
Volume
$19,071.42
Positions
Georgia TechGeorgia TechUnder+2
9A4
0x9a09…5286Event PnL
-$93.75
Volume
$18,750.00
Positions
Georgia Tech
VE5
VeryLucky888Event PnL
+$12.26
Volume
$13,850.10
Positions
Georgia TechGeorgia TechGeorgia Tech+2
B46
0xb4F9…0186Event PnL
-$49.28
Volume
$12,796.40
Positions
Over
RO7
royalestakeEvent PnL
-$36.45
Volume
$7,291.67
Positions
Georgia Tech
FO8
forecastication4Event PnL
+$25.67
Volume
$5,133.00
Positions
Under
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "Georgia Tech vs. Stanford"?
As of the latest update, O/U 28.5 leads the field as the frontrunner with a 9,200% win probability, followed by O/U 30.5 at 9,100% and O/U 32.5 at 8,600%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $95.4K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.