
Berlin State Election: Grüne Vote Share?
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Berlin State Election: Grüne Vote Share?”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, 14-17% is dominating the market with an overwhelming 97.5% chance of winning. <14% follows in second place at 2%, while 17-20% sits in third with 0.7%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $74.9K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- 14-17% (97.5%): Currently commanding the highest probability, 14-17% is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 97¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $27.4K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- <14% (2%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, <14% maintains a 2% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 2¢.
- 17-20% (0.7%): Sitting in third place with a 0.7% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward 17-20%, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~0%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes 20%+ (0.2%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like 20%+ are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14-17% | 97.5% | $27.4K | 97¢ | 3¢ |
| 2 | <14% | 2.0% | $30.3K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 3 | 17-20% | 0.7% | $13.7K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 4 | 20%+ | 0.1% | $3.7K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
Result Rules
Parliamentary elections to elect the Abgeordnetenhaus of Berlin are scheduled to take place in Berlin on September 20, 2026.
This market will resolve according to the percentage of valid second votes (Zweitstimme) received by Grüne in the specified election.
If the reported value falls exactly between two brackets, then this market will resolve to the higher range bracket.
This market will resolve solely based on the percentage of valid second votes (Zweitstimme) won by the specified party, defined as the number of valid second votes won by the specified party divided by the total number of valid second votes in the specified election.
Valid vote percentages will be counted only where the Election Office of Berlin (Landeswahlleiter Berlin) attributes them to the aforementioned party. Vote percentages attributed to other parties or electoral designations will not count, regardless of electoral cooperation, endorsements, coalition agreements, or subsequent parliamentary-group arrangements. If the specified party formally merges into a successor party before the election and does not contest separately, the valid vote percentage of the successor party will count towards resolution.
If the results of this election are not definitively known by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to the lowest range bracket.
This market will resolve based on the results of this election as indicated by a consensus of credible reporting. If there is ambiguity, this market will resolve based solely on the official results as reported by the Election Office of Berlin (Landeswahlleiter Berlin https://www.berlin.de/wahlen/).
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome 14-17% currently trades at 97.5%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 73.4%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -24.1%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies 17-20% as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 0.7% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 20.2% — yielding an impressive +19.5% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include <14% (EV Gap: +8.1%) and 20%+ (EV Gap: +0.2%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14-17% | 97.5% | 73.4% | -24.1% |
| <14% | 2.0% | 10.1% | +8.1% |
| 17-20%Best EV | 0.7% | 20.2% | +19.5% |
| 20%+ | 0.1% | 0.4% | +0.2% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Sep 20, 2026
- 08:06 PM0X0x8B8b9c565C8dCA43cfb767F0F2C20B2B323d2512-1778811726293$1.02
Bought 1.02 No for Will Grüne win between 17% and 20% of all valid second votes? at 1
- 08:06 PM919182736455463728190$1.00
Bought 1.024583 Yes for Will Grüne win between 14% and 17% of all valid second votes? at 0.98
- 08:06 PM0X0x005ED998fCb786679Eb8Bfd0d20c15C0903D6D8E-1778811773658$1.00
Bought 1.02 No for Will Grüne win less than 14% of all valid second votes? at 0.98
- 08:05 PMSAsanlitouP2$20.10
Bought 20.5128 No for Will Grüne win less than 14% of all valid second votes? at 0.98
- 07:56 PMUNunicornxing$45.08
Bought 46 No for Will Grüne win less than 14% of all valid second votes? at 0.98
- 07:45 PMDOdonpops$3.64
Sold 3.75 No for Will Grüne win less than 14% of all valid second votes? at 0.97
- 07:37 PMKEkeepingitral$1.10
Bought 36.51 Yes for Will Grüne win less than 14% of all valid second votes? at 0.03
- 07:37 PM0X0x122Cb94C437EA5e6f088c6c0C143c592ab8EFBed-1782168978900$61.59
Bought 63.49 No for Will Grüne win less than 14% of all valid second votes? at 0.97
- 07:37 PMBRBrazenBanana$1.00
Bought 1.0101 Yes for Will Grüne win between 14% and 17% of all valid second votes? at 0.99
- 07:37 PM0X0x122Cb94C437EA5e6f088c6c0C143c592ab8EFBed-1782168978900$19.60
Bought 20 No for Will Grüne win less than 14% of all valid second votes? at 0.98
- 07:37 PM0X0x122Cb94C437EA5e6f088c6c0C143c592ab8EFBed-1782168978900$97.00
Bought 100 No for Will Grüne win less than 14% of all valid second votes? at 0.97
- 07:37 PMOCoccasionalAwareness$234.02
Bought 243.77 Yes for Will Grüne win between 14% and 17% of all valid second votes? at 0.96
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "Berlin State Election: Grüne Vote Share?"?
As of the latest update, 14-17% leads the field as the frontrunner with a 97.5% win probability, followed by <14% at 2% and 17-20% at 0.7%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $74.9K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags 17-20% as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 0.7% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 20.2% — an Expected Value gap of +19.5%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around 14-17%. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 97.5%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 73.4%, a negative EV Gap of -24.1% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. <14% holds a positive EV Gap of +8.1%, and 20%+ shows +0.2%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
