
Bank of England decision in November?
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Bank of England decision in November?”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, No change is dominating the market with an overwhelming 73.5% chance of winning. 25 bps increase follows in second place at 26.5%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $41.9K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- No change (73.5%): Currently commanding the highest probability, No change is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 74¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $21.4K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- 25 bps increase (26.5%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, 25 bps increase maintains a 26.5% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 27¢.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No change | 73.5% | $21.4K | 74¢ | 27¢ |
| 2 | 25 bps increase | 26.5% | $9.9K | 27¢ | 74¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve according to the change in basis points in the Bank Rate resulting from the November 2026 meeting of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee, relative to the level it was prior to this meeting.
The resolution source will be official information from the Bank of England, including the statement or release from its November 2026 Monetary Policy Committee meeting, scheduled for November 5, 2026, as listed on the official Bank of England calendar (https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/monetary-policy/upcoming-mpc-dates). This market may resolve as soon as the statement or release of the Bank of England's November 2026 Monetary Policy Committee meeting with relevant data is issued.
If the specified rate is defined by an upper and lower bound, the relevant change will be the change to the upper bound.
If the specified rate is changed to a level not expressed in the displayed options, the change will be rounded according to the following guidelines. Increases or decreases of less than 25 bps will be rounded to 25 bps (e.g. an increase or decrease of 10 bps would be considered to be an increase or decrease of 25 bps). Increases or decreases of greater than 25 bps will be rounded to the nearest 25 bps and will be rounded away from 0 in cases of equidistance (e.g., an increase or decrease of 37.5 bps would be considered to be an increase or decrease of 50 bps). Displayed options of “Increase” or “Decrease” will include policy rate increases or decreases of any size.
If the specified meeting is postponed to a date and time before the start of the next scheduled meeting, this market will resolve based on the outcome of that postponed meeting. If the specified meeting is cancelled, or postponed such that no decision is announced by the start of the next scheduled meeting, this market will resolve to the “No Change” bracket. Emergency changes to the specified rate not resulting from the specified meeting will not be considered.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome 25 bps increase currently trades at 26.5%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 17.4%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -9.1%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| No change | 73.5% | 68.8% | -4.7% |
| 25 bps increase | 26.5% | 17.4% | -9.1% |
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "Bank of England decision in November?"?
As of the latest update, No change leads the field as the frontrunner with a 73.5% win probability, followed by 25 bps increase at 26.5%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $41.9K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around 25 bps increase. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 26.5%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 17.4%, a negative EV Gap of -9.1% that signals the contract is overpriced.
