Argentina Annual Inflation 2026

According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Argentina Annual Inflation 2026”, traders have formed a strong consensus.

Currently, 30.0-34.9% is dominating the market with an overwhelming 53.9% chance of winning. 25-29.9% follows in second place at 39%, while <20% sits in third with 1.8%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $43.8K, reflecting intense industry interest.

To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:

🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader

• 30.0-34.9% (53.9%): Currently commanding the highest probability, 30.0-34.9% is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 54¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $12.7K in volume.

🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers

• 25-29.9% (39%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, 25-29.9% maintains a 39% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 39¢.
• <20% (1.8%): Sitting in third place with a 1.8% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward <20%, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.

🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~5.3%)

Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:

• Alternative Options: This includes 45%+ (1.4%), 20-24.9% (1%), and 40-44.9% (1%).
• Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like 35–39.9% are still attracting notable interest.

This is a market about Argentinian inflation over the 12-month period ending December 2026, before seasonal adjustment, as reported by the National Institute of Statistics and Census (INDEC) of Argentina.

This market will resolve according to the percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI / IPC) over the 12-month period ending in December 2026 (Variación % interanual Total nacional) according to the monthly INDEC report.

The resolution source for this market will be the INDEC Consumer Price Index report released for December 2026 (https://www.indec.gob.ar/), expected to be released in January 2027. Resolution of this market will take place upon release of the aforementioned data. If no data for the specified month is released by the date the next month's data is scheduled to be released, this market will resolve based on data from the last available month.

You can find this report by clicking on the “Precios al consumidor” option on the home page of https://www.indec.gob.ar/, and searching the pdf for the figure under “Variación % interanual Total nacional”.

Note: the resolution source for this market will be the official monthly INDEC CPI (IPC) news release which reports inflation over 12 month periods to only one decimal point (e.g. 33.6%). Thus, this is the level of precision that will be used when resolving the market.

While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.

Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.

Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities

Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:

• The Most Overvalued Outcome 25-29.9% currently trades at 39%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 28.1%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -10.9%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
• The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies 20-24.9% as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 1% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 7.9% — yielding an impressive +6.9% EV Gap.
• Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include 35–39.9% (EV Gap: +2.6%) and 45%+ (EV Gap: +1.6%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.