
Will Russia target Kyiv on...?
核心摘要
根據「Will Russia target Kyiv on...?」的最新預測市場資料,交易者已形成強烈共識。
目前,September 11 以壓倒性的 99.7% 獲勝機率主導市場;September 16 以 86% 位居第二,September 12 以 84.5% 排名第三。該市場的下注量已達 $68K,反映出市場的高度關注。
競爭梯隊拆解
為了更好地評估各潛在結果的位置,可依據隱含機率與合約定價將市場劃分為三個明顯的交易梯隊:
🥇 第一梯隊:絕對領跑者
- September 11 (99.7%):September 11 目前擁有最高機率,深受訂單簿青睞。看好該結果的交易者面對的「Buy Yes」合約價為 100¢,顯示出市場的高度確信。僅該合約就已產生 $4.8K 的成交量。
🥈 第二梯隊:主要挑戰者
- September 16 (86%):作為最可行的替代選項,September 16 保持著 86% 的成真機率,其「Buy Yes」份額目前成交價為 86¢。
- September 12 (84.5%):以 84.5% 的機率位列第三,市場對 September 12 持謹慎懷疑態度,除非勢頭轉變,否則視其為外圍黑馬。
🥉 第三梯隊:長尾選項(合計約 0%)
在前三名之外,還有大量宏觀變數與冷門結果被持續追蹤。儘管單個機率偏低,但它們是投機交易者的重要對沖:
- 替代選項:包括 September 13 (84%)、September 25 (81.5%),以及 September 15 (80%)。
- 投機成交:儘管統計機率偏低,像 September 17 這類長尾合約仍吸引著可觀的關注。
完整訂單簿與定價面板
下表列出了該預測池中所有結果的合約價格、機率與市場深度的完整拆解:
| 排名 | 預測結果 | 獲勝機率 | 成交量 | 買入 Yes(成本) | 買入 No(成本) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | September 11 | 99.7% | $4.8K | 100¢ | 0¢ |
| 2 | September 16 | 86.0% | $466 | 86¢ | 14¢ |
| 3 | September 12 | 84.5% | $242 | 85¢ | 16¢ |
| 4 | September 13 | 84.0% | $175 | 84¢ | 16¢ |
| 5 | September 25 | 81.5% | $417 | 82¢ | 19¢ |
| 6 | September 15 | 80.0% | $1.8K | 80¢ | 20¢ |
| 7 | September 17 | 79.0% | $297 | 79¢ | 21¢ |
| 8 | September 20 | 75.5% | $807 | 76¢ | 25¢ |
| 9 | September 22 | 75.0% | $67 | 75¢ | 25¢ |
| 10 | September 24 | 75.0% | $184 | 75¢ | 25¢ |
| 11 | September 14 | 74.5% | $90 | 75¢ | 26¢ |
| 12 | September 21 | 73.5% | $275 | 74¢ | 27¢ |
| 13 | September 18 | 70.5% | $225 | 71¢ | 30¢ |
| 14 | September 19 | 70.0% | $88 | 70¢ | 30¢ |
| 15 | September 29 | 70.0% | $248 | 70¢ | 30¢ |
| 16 | September 28 | 67.5% | $62 | 68¢ | 33¢ |
| 17 | September 26 | 66.5% | $1.1K | 67¢ | 34¢ |
| 18 | September 27 | 64.5% | $107 | 65¢ | 36¢ |
| 19 | September 30 | 64.0% | $127 | 64¢ | 36¢ |
| 20 | September 23 | 62.5% | $47 | 63¢ | 38¢ |
| 21 | September 7 | 4.2% | $20.3K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 22 | September 6 | 0.7% | $8.8K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
裁決規則
This market will resolve to “Yes” if Russia targets Kyiv through a qualifying military action on the specified date, Kyiv time. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No.”
A qualifying military action refers to an air strike or a surface-to-surface missile strike, initiated by Russia, directed at Kyiv. An air strike includes bombs, air-to-surface missiles, and air-launched drones. A surface-to-surface missile strike includes one-way attack drones and surface-to-surface missiles such as cruise or ballistic missiles.
The following actions do not constitute a qualifying military action:
Surface-to-air missile strikes;
Small-arms fire;
Ground incursions;
Cyber operations;
Naval gunfire and artillery fire;
Howitzers, artillery pieces, mortars, and rocket artillery (e.g. MLRS systems);
Minor surface-to-surface strikes, including short range loitering munitions, FPV drones, and ATGM strikes;
Any threat, authorization, or announcement of force that has not been executed.
Military action that consists primarily or exclusively of munitions that are intercepted before impact will still qualify if they constitute a qualifying military action during the specified timeframe; whether the munitions were intercepted, where the munitions landed, and whether damage resulted will not be considered.
A military action will be considered directed at Kyiv if it targets any location within the city of Kyiv.
The occurrence, attribution, timing, and target of a qualifying military action will be primarily determined based on a consensus of information available from the resolution sources. Where multiple sources conflict regarding the occurrence, attribution, timing, or target of a relevant military action, this market will remain open until the earlier of: i) the confirmation of the occurrence, attribution, timing, and target of the action based on a consensus of information available from the resolution sources or ii) 3 full calendar days (Kyiv time) after the specified date. If this period would extend past the end date, this market will remain open to allow for 3 full calendar days to pass. If, at the end of the third calendar day, conflicting reports remain as to the occurrence, attribution, or timing of the action, this market will resolve based on the totality of information available from the resolution sources at that time. No single statement, denial, or presentation of evidence will govern where it is contradicted by the totality of information.
The resolution sources for this market will be official information from the governments and militaries of Ukraine and Russia and a consensus of credible reporting.
AI 估值分析:發現市場錯誤定價與 EV 差
人群共識與投機成交塑造了更宏觀的預測市場,而我們的量化演算法提供了資料驅動的反向視角。透過分析基本面訊號、底層趨勢與歷史分布,我們的 AI 估值模型為每個結果獨立測算出一個「公允價值」機率。
將該公允價值與當前交易價值對比,可揭示出重大背離——即期望值(EV)差。正 EV 差代表統計上被低估的結果,而負 EV 差則提示市場可能存在反應過度。
頂級 AI Alpha 與錯誤定價套利機會
根據最新一輪資料模型測算,以下幾個關鍵合約存在顯著偏離:
- 最被高估的結果:September 20 當前交易價為 75.5%,但我們的 AI 測算其公允價值僅為 46.5%,形成 -29% 的較大負 EV 差,表明人群可能過度炒作該結果、把溢價推得過高。
- 最佳價值標的(最高 EV):我們的模型將 September 15 識別為盤面上最具價值的機會。市場僅給予其 80% 的交易機率,而我們 AI 的公允價值評估為 88.5%——形成可觀的 +8.5% EV 差。
- 被忽視的黑馬:其他值得注意的偏離包括 September 7(EV 差:+5.7%)以及 September 30(EV 差:+1.6%)。儘管我們的預測模型給予更強的統計支撐,這些長尾機會仍被即時訂單簿大幅低估。
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| September 11 | 99.7% | 83.9% | -15.8% |
| September 16 | 86.0% | 66.3% | -19.7% |
| September 12 | 84.5% | 71.0% | -13.5% |
| September 13 | 84.0% | 67.2% | -16.8% |
| September 25 | 81.5% | 80.3% | -1.2% |
| September 15Best EV | 80.0% | 88.5% | +8.5% |
| September 17 | 79.0% | 57.4% | -21.6% |
| September 20 | 75.5% | 46.5% | -29.0% |
| September 22 | 75.0% | 61.3% | -13.7% |
| September 24 | 75.0% | 64.7% | -10.3% |
| September 14 | 74.5% | 74.7% | +0.2% |
| September 21 | 73.5% | 70.5% | -3.0% |
| September 18 | 70.5% | 64.9% | -5.6% |
| September 19 | 70.0% | 62.2% | -7.8% |
| September 29 | 70.0% | 60.8% | -9.2% |
| September 28 | 67.5% | 60.1% | -7.4% |
| September 26 | 66.5% | 58.0% | -8.6% |
| September 27 | 64.5% | 63.6% | -0.9% |
| September 30 | 64.0% | 65.6% | +1.6% |
| September 23 | 62.5% | 46.5% | -16.0% |
| September 7 | 4.2% | 9.9% | +5.7% |
| September 6 | 0.7% | 1.0% | +0.4% |
交易動態
以下是該事件的交易動態。
Sep 10, 2026
- 09:41 PMFOFortunaFelix$2.25
Bought 3.46 Yes for Will Russia target Kyiv on September 26, 2026? at 0.65
- 08:50 PMLULuck7.7.7$50.82
Sold 52.94 Yes for Will Russia target Kyiv on September 11, 2026? at 0.96
- 08:46 PMAJAJSV$4.28
Bought 6.79 Yes for Will Russia target Kyiv on September 27, 2026? at 0.63
- 08:41 PMFRFrogCharts$2.10
Bought 34.95 Yes for Will Russia target Kyiv on September 7, 2026? at 0.06
- 08:39 PMBRBromley86$1.20
Sold 20 Yes for Will Russia target Kyiv on September 7, 2026? at 0.06
- 08:39 PMBRBromley86$8.58
Sold 143 Yes for Will Russia target Kyiv on September 7, 2026? at 0.06
- 08:24 PMAJAJSV$10.79
Bought 16.104478 Yes for Will Russia target Kyiv on September 18, 2026? at 0.67
- 08:24 PMMIMiaomi666$12.59
Bought 17.24691 Yes for Will Russia target Kyiv on September 18, 2026? at 0.73
- 08:19 PMRIrichyee$1.50
Sold 50 No for Will Russia target Kyiv on September 11, 2026? at 0.03
- 08:16 PM——$1.20
Sold 40 No for Will Russia target Kyiv on September 11, 2026? at 0.03
- 08:14 PMPApalamarchuk$4.00
Sold 20 No for Will Russia target Kyiv on September 18, 2026? at 0.2
- 08:11 PMNOnogambler$6.68
Sold 166.99 No for Will Russia target Kyiv on September 11, 2026? at 0.04
正在押注該事件的鯨魚錢包
常見問題
目前市場對「Will Russia target Kyiv on...?」的共識是什麼?
截至最新更新,September 11 以 99.7% 的獲勝機率領跑,其次是 September 16(86%),以及 September 12(84.5%)。該市場總成交量已達 $68K,顯示出充足的流動性與高交易參與度。
AI 公允價值與即時市場交易價值有何不同?
即時市場交易價值反映的是公眾情緒、訂單簿動能與投機資金。我們的 AI 公允價值則由量化模型獨立計算,剔除情緒炒作、專注底層數據。兩者出現顯著背離時即形成 EV 差,提示市場對某個結果可能存在錯誤定價。
目前哪個結果的期望值(EV)最高?
最新一輪測算顯示,September 15 是最顯著的錯誤定價。市場對其隱含機率僅給到 80%,而我們的 AI 測算其公允價值為 88.5%——形成 +8.5% 的期望值差,是該市場中最具價值的標的。
市場共識是否對某個結果反應過度?
是的——資料顯示市場對 September 20 存在明顯的反應過度。人群把其即時交易價值推高至 75.5%,但我們的公允價值評估認為其真實機率僅為 46.5%,形成 -29% 的負 EV 差,表明該合約被高估。
長尾資料中是否藏有高價值的黑馬選項?
當然有。除了頭部結果之外,我們的模型在排名靠後的選項中發現了被低估的潛力。September 7 擁有 +5.7% 的正 EV 差,September 30 則為 +1.6%。儘管量化層面更有支撐,這些合約仍被即時訂單簿低估。
