
Which mobs will eliminate Jynxzi, Ron or Los?
核心摘要
根據「Which mobs will eliminate Jynxzi, Ron or Los?」的最新預測市場資料,交易者已形成強烈共識。
目前,Blaze 以壓倒性的 50% 獲勝機率主導市場;Polar Bear 以 5.8% 位居第二。該市場的下注量已達 $89.2K,反映出市場的高度關注。
競爭梯隊拆解
為了更好地評估各潛在結果的位置,可依據隱含機率與合約定價將市場劃分為三個明顯的交易梯隊:
🥇 第一梯隊:絕對領跑者
- Blaze (50%):Blaze 目前擁有最高機率,深受訂單簿青睞。看好該結果的交易者面對的「Buy Yes」合約價為 50¢,顯示出市場的高度確信。
🥈 第二梯隊:主要挑戰者
- Polar Bear (5.8%):作為最可行的替代選項,Polar Bear 保持著 5.8% 的成真機率,其「Buy Yes」份額目前成交價為 6¢。
完整訂單簿與定價面板
下表列出了該預測池中所有結果的合約價格、機率與市場深度的完整拆解:
| 排名 | 預測結果 | 獲勝機率 | 成交量 | 買入 Yes(成本) | 買入 No(成本) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blaze | 50.0% | — | 50¢ | 50¢ |
| 2 | Polar Bear | 5.8% | $2.8K | 6¢ | 94¢ |
裁決規則
Jynxzi, StableRonaldo, and Los Pollos are scheduled to stream a hardcore Minecraft marathon on October 5, 2026, in which they will attempt to defeat the Ender Dragon in a hardcore Minecraft world on Java Edition, without any of the three dying in-game.
This market will resolve to "Yes" if a death message containing the specified mob's name is displayed for any of Jynxzi, Ron, or Los following an in-game death during the marathon. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
Any death message containing the specified mob's name will count, including its plural and possessive forms, and regardless of how the mob caused the in-game death. The exact mob name must appear; a death message naming a different mob whose name contains the specified mob's name will not count. For example, an in-game death to a Wither Skeleton will not resolve "Skeleton" to "Yes," and an in-game death to a Cave Spider will not resolve "Spider" to "Yes."
An in-game death seeming to be caused by the specified mob will not count if the mob's name does not appear in the death message. If a mob has been renamed, this market will resolve based on the actual mob type that caused the in-game death rather than the name displayed in the death message.
A death message produced by any means other than an actual in-game death, including chat messages, overlays, or messages triggered by commands, will not count.
Only one qualifying in-game death is required, and it may be by any of the three players. This market will resolve to "Yes" immediately upon a qualifying in-game death.
Only in-game deaths of the three accounts played by Jynxzi, StableRonaldo, and Los Pollos will count. In-game deaths of any other player in the world, including guests, moderators, or co-streamers playing on their own accounts, will not count. It does not matter who is physically at the controls when an in-game death occurs; only whose account died in-game.
Deaths in any Minecraft world played as part of the marathon will count, including restarts on new seeds, and including if Jynxzi, StableRonaldo, and Los Pollos modify or abandon the objectives of the challenge, change the ruleset, or play outside of Hardcore mode at any point.
Only in-game deaths occurring while at least one of the three players is broadcasting the marathon live will count. Footage of off-stream or previously recorded attempts will not qualify.
This market will remain open until the marathon is declared complete, abandoned, or otherwise finally ended by Jynxzi, StableRonaldo, or Los Pollos, regardless of whether the challenge is completed. If the marathon ends without a qualifying in-game death, or if the marathon is cancelled or never begins, this market will resolve to "No". If the marathon is still ongoing as of November 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve based on in-game deaths that have occurred up to that time."
The resolution source for this market will be footage from the official broadcasts of the marathon on Jynxzi's, StableRonaldo's, and Los Pollos's official broadcasts on YouTube and Twitch.
AI 估值分析:發現市場錯誤定價與 EV 差
人群共識與投機成交塑造了更宏觀的預測市場,而我們的量化演算法提供了資料驅動的反向視角。透過分析基本面訊號、底層趨勢與歷史分布,我們的 AI 估值模型為每個結果獨立測算出一個「公允價值」機率。
將該公允價值與當前交易價值對比,可揭示出重大背離——即期望值(EV)差。正 EV 差代表統計上被低估的結果,而負 EV 差則提示市場可能存在反應過度。
頂級 AI Alpha 與錯誤定價套利機會
根據最新一輪資料模型測算,以下幾個關鍵合約存在顯著偏離:
- 最被高估的結果:Blaze 當前交易價為 50%,但我們的 AI 測算其公允價值僅為 38%,形成 -12% 的較大負 EV 差,表明人群可能過度炒作該結果、把溢價推得過高。
- 最佳價值標的(最高 EV):我們的模型將 Polar Bear 識別為盤面上最具價值的機會。市場僅給予其 5.8% 的交易機率,而我們 AI 的公允價值評估為 10.3%——形成可觀的 +4.5% EV 差。
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blaze | 50.0% | 38.0% | -12.0% |
| Polar BearBest EV | 5.8% | 10.3% | +4.5% |
交易動態
以下是該事件的交易動態。
Oct 9, 2026
- 01:19 AMBObondbondbond$71.48
Bought 72.2 No for Will Jynxzi, Ron or Los die to an iron golem in a 3rd timeframe? at 0.99
- 01:19 AMBObondbondbond$118.58
Bought 121 No for Will Jynxzi, Ron or Los die to an iron golem in a 3rd timeframe? at 0.98
- 12:22 AMPOpolIRL$34.88
Sold 35.59 No for Will Jynxzi, Ron or Los die to a blaze? at 0.98
- 12:20 AMHAHarleyFF$22.20
Bought 22.65305 No for Will Jynxzi, Ron or Los die to a creeper in a 7th timeframe? at 0.98
- 12:19 AMFLflywheelpoly$130.34
Bought 133 No for Will Jynxzi, Ron or Los die to a slime? at 0.98
- 12:19 AMFLflywheelpoly$29.70
Bought 30 No for Will Jynxzi, Ron or Los die to a vex? at 0.99
- 12:19 AMFLflywheelpoly$98.00
Bought 100 No for Will Jynxzi, Ron or Los die to a witch? at 0.98
- 12:18 AMFLflywheelpoly$29.40
Bought 30 No for Will Jynxzi, Ron or Los die to an iron golem in a 3rd timeframe? at 0.98
- 12:18 AMFLflywheelpoly$9.90
Bought 10 No for Will Jynxzi, Ron or Los die to a zombified piglin? at 0.99
- 12:18 AM1W1walrus$46.06
Bought 47 No for Will Jynxzi, Ron or Los die to a warden? at 0.98
- 12:18 AM1W1walrus$20.37
Bought 21 No for Will Jynxzi, Ron or Los die to a slime? at 0.97
- 12:18 AMANAnjun$133.00
Bought 133 No for Will Jynxzi, Ron or Los die to a polar bear? at 1
正在押注該事件的鯨魚錢包
常見問題
目前市場對「Which mobs will eliminate Jynxzi, Ron or Los?」的共識是什麼?
截至最新更新,Blaze 以 50% 的獲勝機率領跑,其次是 Polar Bear(5.8%)。該市場總成交量已達 $89.2K,顯示出充足的流動性與高交易參與度。
AI 公允價值與即時市場交易價值有何不同?
即時市場交易價值反映的是公眾情緒、訂單簿動能與投機資金。我們的 AI 公允價值則由量化模型獨立計算,剔除情緒炒作、專注底層數據。兩者出現顯著背離時即形成 EV 差,提示市場對某個結果可能存在錯誤定價。
目前哪個結果的期望值(EV)最高?
最新一輪測算顯示,Polar Bear 是最顯著的錯誤定價。市場對其隱含機率僅給到 5.8%,而我們的 AI 測算其公允價值為 10.3%——形成 +4.5% 的期望值差,是該市場中最具價值的標的。
市場共識是否對某個結果反應過度?
是的——資料顯示市場對 Blaze 存在明顯的反應過度。人群把其即時交易價值推高至 50%,但我們的公允價值評估認為其真實機率僅為 38%,形成 -12% 的負 EV 差,表明該合約被高估。
