
Indiana vs. Rutgers
Resumen Principal
Según los datos más recientes del mercado de predicción para la consulta “Indiana vs. Rutgers”, los operadores han formado un fuerte consenso.
Actualmente, Indiana vs. Rutgers domina el mercado con una abrumadora probabilidad de victoria del 9890%. Spread -4.5 le sigue en segundo lugar con 9855%, mientras que Spread -2.5 se sitúa tercero con 9805%. El volumen de apuestas de este mercado ya alcanza $292K, lo que refleja un enorme interés.
Desglose de Niveles Competitivos
Para evaluar mejor la posición de cada resultado posible, el mercado puede segmentarse en tres niveles de negociación según la probabilidad implícita y el precio de los contratos:
🥇 Nivel 1: El líder dominante
- Indiana vs. Rutgers (9890%): Con la probabilidad más alta, Indiana vs. Rutgers cuenta con un fuerte respaldo del libro de órdenes. Quienes quieran apostar por este resultado se enfrentan a un precio de contrato “Buy Yes” de 9890¢, señal de una gran convicción del mercado. Solo este contrato ha generado $52.3K de volumen.
🥈 Nivel 2: Los principales aspirantes
- Spread -4.5 (9855%): Como la alternativa más viable, Spread -4.5 mantiene una probabilidad del 9855% de resolverse a favor. Sus acciones “Buy Yes” cotizan actualmente a 9855¢.
- Spread -2.5 (9805%): En tercer lugar con una probabilidad del 9805%, el mercado muestra un escepticismo prudente hacia Spread -2.5, tratándolo como un comodín externo salvo que cambie el impulso.
🥉 Nivel 3: Las opciones de cola larga (suman ~0%)
Más allá de las tres primeras opciones, se sigue un amplio campo de variables macro y resultados poco probables. Aunque sus probabilidades individuales son bajas, son coberturas clave para los operadores especulativos:
- Opciones alternativas: Esto incluye Spread -3.5 (9800%), Spread -17.5 (9650%) y Spread -7.5 (9550%).
- Volumen especulativo: A pesar de su baja probabilidad estadística, ciertos contratos de cola larga como Spread -16.5 siguen atrayendo un interés notable.
Panel Integral de Libro de Órdenes y Precios
La siguiente tabla detalla el desglose completo de precios de contratos, probabilidades y profundidad de mercado para todos los resultados de este pool de predicción:
| Rango | Resultado Previsto | Probabilidad | Volumen | Comprar Sí (Coste) | Comprar No (Coste) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Indiana vs. Rutgers | 9890.0% | $52.3K | 9890¢ | -9790¢ |
| 2 | Spread -4.5 | 9855.0% | — | 9855¢ | -9755¢ |
| 3 | Spread -2.5 | 9805.0% | — | 9805¢ | -9705¢ |
| 4 | Spread -3.5 | 9800.0% | — | 9800¢ | -9700¢ |
| 5 | Spread -17.5 | 9650.0% | $77 | 9650¢ | -9550¢ |
| 6 | Spread -7.5 | 9550.0% | $141 | 9550¢ | -9450¢ |
| 7 | Spread -16.5 | 9480.0% | $263 | 9480¢ | -9380¢ |
| 8 | Spread -14.5 | 9410.0% | $10 | 9410¢ | -9310¢ |
| 9 | Spread -6.5 | 9400.0% | — | 9400¢ | -9300¢ |
| 10 | Spread -20.5 | 9350.0% | $3 | 9350¢ | -9250¢ |
| 11 | Spread -5.5 | 9350.0% | — | 9350¢ | -9250¢ |
| 12 | Spread -10.5 | 9290.0% | $230 | 9290¢ | -9190¢ |
| 13 | Spread -23.5 | 9100.0% | $3.5K | 9100¢ | -9000¢ |
| 14 | Spread -21.5 | 9100.0% | $1.3K | 9100¢ | -9000¢ |
| 15 | O/U 37.5 | 8950.0% | — | 8950¢ | -8850¢ |
| 16 | Spread -9.5 | 8905.0% | $418 | 8905¢ | -8805¢ |
| 17 | Spread -24.5 | 8800.0% | $107.0K | 8800¢ | -8700¢ |
| 18 | Spread -13.5 | 8655.0% | $373 | 8655¢ | -8555¢ |
| 19 | Spread -27.5 | 8200.0% | $787 | 8200¢ | -8100¢ |
| 20 | O/U 43.5 | 7350.0% | $1.0K | 7350¢ | -7250¢ |
| 21 | Spread -30.5 | 7350.0% | $25 | 7350¢ | -7250¢ |
| 22 | Spread -28.5 | 6950.0% | — | 6950¢ | -6850¢ |
| 23 | O/U 45.5 | 6200.0% | — | 6200¢ | -6100¢ |
| 24 | Spread -32.5 | 5950.0% | — | 5950¢ | -5850¢ |
| 25 | Spread -31.5 | 5800.0% | — | 5800¢ | -5700¢ |
| 26 | O/U 63.5 | 5650.0% | — | 5650¢ | -5550¢ |
| 27 | O/U 47.5 | 5450.0% | — | 5450¢ | -5350¢ |
| 28 | O/U 49.5 | 5150.0% | $467 | 5150¢ | -5050¢ |
| 29 | Spread -44.5 | 5150.0% | — | 5150¢ | -5050¢ |
| 30 | Spread -34.5 | 5150.0% | — | 5150¢ | -5050¢ |
| 31 | Spread -8.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 32 | 4Q O/U 16.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 33 | 4Q O/U 19.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 34 | Indiana O/U 23.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 35 | Spread -22.5 | 5050.0% | $206 | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 36 | Spread -18.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 37 | Spread -15.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 38 | Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 39 | Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 40 | Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 41 | Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 42 | Spread -2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 43 | Spread -3.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 44 | Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 45 | Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 46 | Spread -6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 47 | Spread -7.5 | 5000.0% | $141 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 48 | Spread -8.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 49 | Spread -10.5 | 5000.0% | $230 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 50 | Spread -13.5 | 5000.0% | $373 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 51 | Spread -14.5 | 5000.0% | $10 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 52 | Spread -16.5 | 5000.0% | $263 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 53 | Spread -17.5 | 5000.0% | $77 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 54 | Spread -20.5 | 5000.0% | $3 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 55 | O/U 35.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 56 | O/U 69.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 57 | O/U 71.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 58 | 2H O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 59 | 2H O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 60 | 2H O/U 27.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 61 | 2H O/U 30.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 62 | 2H O/U 33.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 63 | 3Q O/U 7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 64 | 3Q O/U 10.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 65 | 3Q O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 66 | 3Q O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 67 | 3Q O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 68 | 4Q O/U 10.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 69 | 4Q O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 70 | Indiana O/U 26.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 71 | Indiana O/U 29.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 72 | Indiana O/U 32.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 73 | Rutgers O/U 26.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 74 | Rutgers O/U 29.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 75 | Rutgers O/U 32.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 76 | Rutgers O/U 35.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 77 | Indiana 2H O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 78 | Indiana 2H O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 79 | Indiana 2H O/U 15.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 80 | Rutgers 2H O/U 12.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 81 | Rutgers 2H O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 82 | Rutgers 2H O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 83 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 84 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 85 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 86 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 87 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 88 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 89 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 90 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 91 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 92 | Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 93 | Pick-Six Scored | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 94 | Indiana vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 95 | Indiana vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 96 | Indiana vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 97 | Indiana Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 98 | Indiana Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 99 | Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 100 | Indiana Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 101 | Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 102 | Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 103 | Indiana Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 104 | Indiana Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 105 | Indiana Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 106 | Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 107 | Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 108 | Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 109 | Indiana Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 110 | Indiana Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 111 | Indiana Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 112 | Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 113 | Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 114 | Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 115 | Indiana Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 116 | Indiana Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 117 | Indiana Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 118 | Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 119 | Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 120 | Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 121 | Indiana 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 122 | Indiana 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 123 | Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 124 | Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 125 | Indiana Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 126 | Indiana Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 127 | Indiana Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 128 | Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 129 | Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 130 | Indiana Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 131 | Indiana Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 132 | Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 133 | Indiana Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 134 | Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 135 | Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 136 | Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 137 | Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 138 | Indiana Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 139 | Indiana Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 140 | Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 141 | Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 142 | Indiana Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 143 | Indiana vs. Rutgers: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 144 | Indiana vs. Rutgers: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 145 | Indiana vs. Rutgers: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 146 | Spread -19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 147 | 2H Spread -15.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 148 | 2H Spread -13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 149 | 2H Spread -12.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 150 | 2H Spread -11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 151 | 2H Spread -10.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 152 | 2H Spread -8.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 153 | 3Q Spread -9.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 154 | 3Q Spread -7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 155 | 3Q Spread -6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 156 | 3Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 157 | 3Q Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 158 | 3Q Spread -2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 159 | 4Q Spread -9.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 160 | 4Q Spread -7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 161 | 4Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 162 | 4Q Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 163 | 4Q Spread -2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 164 | 2H Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 165 | Indiana O/U 5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 166 | Rutgers O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 167 | 3Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 168 | 4Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 169 | Rutgers O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 170 | O/U 39.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 171 | O/U 65.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 172 | O/U 75.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 173 | 4Q O/U 7.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 174 | Game Goes to Overtime | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 175 | 4Q Spread -6.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 176 | O/U 41.5 | 4850.0% | — | 4850¢ | -4750¢ |
| 177 | Spread -25.5 | 4800.0% | $1.7K | 4800¢ | -4700¢ |
| 178 | Spread -26.5 | 4750.0% | $1.8K | 4750¢ | -4650¢ |
| 179 | Spread -38.5 | 4700.0% | $9 | 4700¢ | -4600¢ |
| 180 | Spread -29.5 | 4700.0% | — | 4700¢ | -4600¢ |
| 181 | O/U 51.5 | 4300.0% | — | 4300¢ | -4200¢ |
| 182 | Spread -37.5 | 4150.0% | — | 4150¢ | -4050¢ |
| 183 | Spread -40.5 | 3550.0% | — | 3550¢ | -3450¢ |
| 184 | Spread -41.5 | 3500.0% | $4.4K | 3500¢ | -3400¢ |
| 185 | O/U 53.5 | 3450.0% | $548 | 3450¢ | -3350¢ |
| 186 | O/U 59.5 | 3050.0% | — | 3050¢ | -2950¢ |
| 187 | O/U 55.5 | 2600.0% | $10.0K | 2600¢ | -2500¢ |
| 188 | O/U 57.5 | 2050.0% | $45.8K | 2050¢ | -1950¢ |
| 189 | Rutgers O/U 23.5 | 2050.0% | — | 2050¢ | -1950¢ |
| 190 | O/U 61.5 | 1300.0% | — | 1300¢ | -1200¢ |
| 191 | O/U 67.5 | 600.0% | — | 600¢ | -500¢ |
| 192 | O/U 73.5 | 345.0% | $11 | 345¢ | -245¢ |
Reglas de Resolución
In the upcoming college football game between Indiana and Rutgers, scheduled for October 3 at 8:00PM ET:
This market will resolve to "Indiana" if Indiana win the game.
This market will resolve to "Rutgers" if Rutgers win the game.
Overtime is included if played.
If the game ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50.
If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50.
Actividad de Trading
Aquí está la actividad de trading de este evento.
Oct 3, 2026
- 11:59 PMHIHighIQDegens$42.59
Bought 90.61 Indiana for 1H Spread: Indiana (-14.5) at 0.47
- 11:58 PMBABaltzeus41$3.00
Bought 5.084746 Rutgers for Spread: Indiana (-27.5) at 0.59
- 11:58 PMNEneutralwave23$47.50
Bought 84.821429 Rutgers for Spread: Indiana (-26.5) at 0.56
- 11:58 PMNInigiri99$3.68
Bought 8 Rutgers for 1H Spread: Indiana (-13.5) at 0.46
- 11:56 PMTEtexaskid$118.00
Bought 236 Indiana for Spread: Indiana (-24.5) at 0.5
- 11:56 PM——$9.01
Bought 17.666667 Indiana for Spread: Indiana (-24.5) at 0.51
- 11:55 PMJAJarod21$12.43
Bought 27.62 Indiana for Spread: Indiana (-26.5) at 0.45
- 11:55 PMJAJarod21$12.42
Bought 27.6 Indiana for Spread: Indiana (-26.5) at 0.45
- 11:55 PMKEkeinbock$2.76
Bought 6 Rutgers for Spread: Indiana (-23.5) at 0.46
- 11:55 PMFOForAndWithYou$102.22
Bought 222.22 Rutgers for Spread: Indiana (-23.5) at 0.46
- 11:55 PMFOForAndWithYou$101.82
Bought 181.82 Rutgers for Spread: Indiana (-26.5) at 0.56
- 11:55 PMMEMeowtchi$45.06
Bought 97.95 Rutgers for Spread: Indiana (-23.5) at 0.46
Carteras Ballena que Apuestan en Este Evento
Preguntas Frecuentes
¿Cuál es el consenso actual del mercado sobre "Indiana vs. Rutgers"?
A fecha de la última actualización, Indiana vs. Rutgers lidera como favorito con una probabilidad de victoria del 9890%, seguido de Spread -4.5 con 9855% y Spread -2.5 con 9805%. El volumen total negociado alcanza $292K, lo que indica una gran liquidez y participación.
