
Risk & Control
volatility-modeling
This Skill provides end-to-end volatility estimation, forecasting, and regime-classification tools tailored for crypto markets. It implements multiple estimators (close-to-close, Parkinson high-low, realized volatility from intraday samples), forward-looking models (EWMA, GARCH), volatility-cone con
Overview
This Skill provides end-to-end volatility estimation, forecasting, and regime-classification tools tailored for crypto markets.
This Skill provides end-to-end volatility estimation, forecasting, and regime-classification tools tailored for crypto markets. It implements multiple estimators (close-to-close, Parkinson high-low, realized volatility from intraday samples), forward-looking models (EWMA, GARCH), volatility-cone construction, and implied-vol integration where option data exists (e.g., Deribit). Typical outputs include annualized realized and forecast vol, regime labels, volatility cones for context, and numeric signals for position sizing and ATR-style stop placement. Use cases: consistent risk budgeting and vol-targeted portfolio construction, automated position-sizing and stop rules, strategy-selection by regime (momentum vs mean-reversion), and identifying option mispricings. Core advantages are robust multi-method estimation, crypto-specific annualization (365 days), model backtesting and visualization, and deliverables (vol forecasts, regime alerts, recommended sizes/stops) for systematic trading and risk teams.
Skill.md
How this skill works
This Skill provides end-to-end volatility estimation, forecasting, and regime-classification tools tailored for crypto markets. It implements multiple estimators (close-to-close, Parkinson high-low, realized volatility from intraday samples), forward-looking models (EWMA, GARCH), volatility-cone con
Volatility Modeling
Volatility — the magnitude of price fluctuations — is arguably the single most important quantity in trading. It drives position sizing, stop placement, option pricing, and regime detection. This skill covers estimation, forecasting, and practical application of volatility in crypto markets.
Why Volatility Matters
| Use Case | How Volatility Is Used |
|---|---|
| Position sizing | Scale position inversely with vol so each trade risks a consistent dollar amount |
| Stop placement | ATR-based stops widen in high-vol regimes, tighten in low-vol |
| Strategy selection | Mean-reversion works in low vol; momentum works in high vol |
| Risk budgeting | Vol-target portfolios maintain constant portfolio-level risk |
| Regime detection | Vol regime shifts signal changing market dynamics |
| Option pricing | Implied vs realized vol gap creates trading opportunities |
Types of Volatility
Historical (Realized) Volatility
Computed from observed past returns. The most common and directly measurable form. Multiple estimators exist with different statistical efficiency.
Implied Volatility
Derived from option prices via Black-Scholes or similar models. Limited in crypto DeFi where liquid options markets are sparse, but available on Deribit for BTC/ETH.
Forecast Volatility
Predicted future volatility from models like EWMA or GARCH. Used for forward-looking position sizing and risk budgets.
Estimation Methods
1. Close-to-Close (Standard Deviation of Log Returns)
The simplest estimator. Compute the standard deviation of log returns and annualize.
import numpy as np
log_returns = np.log(closes[1:] / closes[:-1])
vol_daily = np.std(log_returns, ddof=1)
vol_annual = vol_daily * np.sqrt(365) # crypto trades 365 days
- Pros: Simple, widely understood.
- Cons: Uses only close prices — ignores intraday range.
2. Parkinson (High-Low Range)
Uses the daily high-low range, which is ~5x more statistically efficient than close-to-close.
hl_ratio = np.log(highs / lows)
vol_parkinson = np.sqrt(np.mean(hl_ratio**2) / (4 * np.log(2))) * np.sqrt(365)
- Pros: More efficient, captures intraday moves.
- Cons: Downward bias with discrete sampling; ignores close-to-close jumps.
3. Garman-Klass (OHLC)
The most efficient single-day OHLC estimator.
hl = np.log(highs / lows)
co = np.log(closes / opens)
gk = np.mean(0.5 * hl**2 - (2 * np.log(2) - 1) * co**2)
vol_gk = np.sqrt(gk) * np.sqrt(365)
- Pros: Best efficiency among OHLC estimators.
- Cons: Assumes no drift; sensitive to opening gaps.
4. Yang-Zhang
Combines overnight (close-to-open) and open-to-close components. Handles gaps properly. Less relevant for 24/7 crypto but useful for tokens with sporadic trading.
5. EWMA (Exponentially Weighted Moving Average)
RiskMetrics approach — no parameters to estimate beyond λ.
lam = 0.94 # RiskMetrics default for daily
ewma_var = np.zeros(len(returns))
ewma_var[0] = returns[0] ** 2
for t in range(1, len(returns)):
ewma_var[t] = lam * ewma_var[t - 1] + (1 - lam) * returns[t - 1] ** 2
vol_ewma = np.sqrt(ewma_var) * np.sqrt(365)
- λ = 0.94 for daily data (RiskMetrics).
- λ = 0.97 for weekly data.
- Higher λ → smoother, slower reaction to new information.
6. GARCH(1,1)
The workhorse autoregressive volatility model. Captures volatility clustering.
σ²_t = ω + α · r²_{t-1} + β · σ²_{t-1}
- ω: long-run variance weight.
- α: reaction to recent shock (typically 0.05–0.15 for crypto).
- β: persistence (typically 0.80–0.90 for crypto).
- α + β < 1: stationarity constraint.
- Long-run variance: ω / (1 − α − β).
Estimated via maximum likelihood. See references/estimators.md for details.
Volatility Cones
Volatility cones show the percentile distribution of realized volatility at different lookback windows, revealing whether current vol is historically high or low.
Construction
- Get 1+ years of daily data.
- For each lookback window (5, 10, 20, 60, 120 days):
- Compute rolling realized volatility.
- Extract percentiles: 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th.
- Plot percentiles vs window length — the "cone" shape.
- Overlay current realized vol at each window.
Interpretation
- Current vol > 75th percentile: historically elevated — expect mean reversion.
- Current vol < 25th percentile: historically compressed — expect expansion.
- Cone narrowing at longer windows: vol mean-reverts over longer horizons.
See references/volatility_cones.md for full methodology and worked examples.
Crypto Volatility Characteristics
Crypto vol differs from traditional assets in important ways:
| Characteristic | Detail |
|---|---|
| Level | 50–150% annualized is typical; TradFi equities are 15–25% |
| Clustering | Strong — high-vol days cluster together |
| Weekday patterns | Weekend vol often lower but weekend gaps can be large |
| Volume correlation | Vol and volume are positively correlated |
| Regime dependence | Bull market vol ≠ bear market vol; ranges are different |
| Mean reversion | Vol mean-reverts more reliably than price |
| Tail risk | Fat tails — more extreme moves than normal distribution predicts |
Regime Classification by Volatility
| Regime | Annualized Vol Range | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Low vol | < 40% | Range-bound, mean reversion works |
| Normal vol | 40–80% | Trending possible, balanced strategies |
| High vol | 80–120% | Strong trends or sharp reversals |
| Crisis vol | > 120% | Liquidation cascades, reduced position size |
Volatility Forecasting
EWMA Forecast
Simple and effective. The current EWMA variance estimate is the 1-step forecast. Multi-step forecasts are flat (same as 1-step).
GARCH Forecast
GARCH produces a term structure of variance forecasts:
σ²_{t+h} = V_L + (α + β)^h · (σ²_t − V_L)
Where V_L = ω / (1 − α − β) is the long-run variance.
- Short-horizon forecasts reflect current conditions.
- Long-horizon forecasts converge to long-run variance.
- The speed of convergence depends on α + β (persistence).
See scripts/vol_forecast.py for a working implementation.
Practical Applications
Position Sizing with Volatility
# Vol-target position sizing
target_vol = 0.02 # 2% daily portfolio vol target
current_vol = 0.05 # 5% daily asset vol (annualized ~95%)
weight = target_vol / current_vol # = 0.40 → 40% allocation
See the position-sizing skill for complete integration.
ATR-Based Stop Placement
atr_14 = talib.ATR(highs, lows, closes, timeperiod=14)
stop_distance = 2.0 * atr_14[-1] # 2x ATR stop
stop_price = entry_price - stop_distance # for longs
Vol-Regime Strategy Selection
vol_percentile = current_vol_percentile(token, window=30)
if vol_percentile < 25:
strategy = "mean_reversion"
elif vol_percentile > 75:
strategy = "momentum_breakout"
else:
strategy = "balanced"
Files
References
| File | Description |
|---|---|
references/estimators.md | Full derivations and details for all volatility estimators |
references/volatility_cones.md | Cone construction methodology and interpretation guide |
Scripts
| File | Description |
|---|---|
scripts/estimate_volatility.py | Multi-estimator volatility computation with cone analysis |
scripts/vol_forecast.py | EWMA and GARCH forecasting with term structure output |
Related Skills
regime-detection— Classify market regimes using volatility as a key input.position-sizing— Scale positions inversely with volatility.risk-management— Portfolio-level vol targeting and risk budgets.pandas-ta— ATR and Bollinger Bands are volatility-based indicators.custom-indicators— Build crypto-specific volatility indicators.
Best used for
When to use it
This Skill provides end-to-end volatility estimation, forecasting, and regime-classification tools tailored for crypto markets. It implements multiple estimators (close-to-close, Parkinson high-low, realized volatility from intraday samples), forward-looking models (EWMA, GARCH), volatility-cone con

01 · PRE-MEETING
Prepare a decision brief
Turn scattered evidence into a structured case before an investment committee meeting.

02 · TEAM WORKFLOW
Standardize handoffs
Create consistent research outputs across analysts, portfolio managers, and agents.

03 · LIVE UPDATE
Refresh the thesis
Update scenarios after a new catalyst, KPI release, or earnings result.
Community notes
Built to improve with use.
随着 Skill 被使用与评审,反馈将展示在这里。
Discover more
Related skills
View allStock Compensation Economic Cost
Treat stock-based compensation as a real economic cost, benchmark dilution, and assess the impact on cash flow, ownership, and true profitability. Use when evaluating software or growth companies…
Goodwill Impairment Risk Indicators
Assess goodwill impairment risk using acquisition history, segment underperformance, valuation compression, and accounting warning signs. Use when evaluating acquisitive companies or balance sheets…
Capitalization Policy Consistency
Compare capitalization policy against accounting norms and peer practice to expose aggressive capitalization, expense deferral, or earnings smoothing. Use when analyzing software, R&D, content, or…