返回 Skill 市场

Risk & Control

value-at-risk-calculator

The Value at Risk Calculator computes VaR and related risk metrics using parametric (variance-covariance), historical simulation, and Monte Carlo simulation methodologies.

Updated today<1 min setup

Overview

The Value at Risk Calculator computes VaR and related risk metrics using parametric (variance-covariance), historical simulation, and Monte Carlo simulation methodologies.

The Value at Risk Calculator computes VaR and related risk metrics using parametric (variance-covariance), historical simulation, and Monte Carlo simulation methodologies. It also supports Conditional VaR (Expected Shortfall), incremental and component VaR, stress testing, backtesting, and regulatory reporting. Typical use cases include portfolio risk assessment, capital allocation, trading desk limit setting, operational risk quantification, regulatory capital modeling, and decision-support under uncertainty. Key features include configurable confidence levels and holding periods, age-weighted historical returns, volatility and correlation inputs, scenario generation, risk decomposition by position, automated backtesting reports, and validation statistics. Outputs include VaR/CVaR values, asset-level risk contributions, P&L distributions, stress loss estimates, and compliance-ready reports, enabling integration with data feeds, risk engines, and governance workflows for robust risk-informed decisions.

Skill.md

How this skill works

The Value at Risk Calculator computes VaR and related risk metrics using parametric (variance-covariance), historical simulation, and Monte Carlo simulation methodologies.

SKILL.mdALPHIO / VERIFIED

Value at Risk Calculator

Overview

The Value at Risk Calculator skill provides comprehensive capabilities for calculating VaR and related risk metrics using multiple methodologies. It supports financial risk assessment, operational risk quantification, and regulatory compliance through parametric, historical, and simulation-based approaches.

Capabilities

  • Historical simulation VaR
  • Parametric VaR (variance-covariance)
  • Monte Carlo VaR
  • Conditional VaR (CVaR/Expected Shortfall)
  • Incremental and component VaR
  • Stress testing
  • Backtesting and validation
  • Regulatory reporting support

Used By Processes

  • Monte Carlo Simulation for Decision Support
  • Risk Assessment
  • Decision Quality Assessment

Usage

Historical Simulation VaR

# Historical VaR configuration
historical_var_config = {
    "method": "historical_simulation",
    "data": {
        "returns": portfolio_returns,  # historical return series
        "period": "daily",
        "history_length": 252  # 1 year of trading days
    },
    "confidence_levels": [0.95, 0.99],
    "holding_period": 1,  # days
    "options": {
        "age_weighting": {
            "enabled": True,
            "decay_factor": 0.97
        }
    }
}

Parametric VaR

# Parametric (variance-covariance) VaR
parametric_var_config = {
    "method": "parametric",
    "portfolio": {
        "positions": {
            "Asset_A": {"value": 1000000, "weight": 0.4},
            "Asset_B": {"value": 750000, "weight": 0.3},
            "Asset_C": {"value": 750000, "weight": 0.3}
        }
    },
    "parameters": {
        "volatilities": {"Asset_A": 0.20, "Asset_B": 0.15, "Asset_C": 0.25},
        "correlation_matrix": [
            [1.0, 0.3, 0.2],
            [0.3, 1.0, 0.5],
            [0.2, 0.5, 1.0]
        ]
    },
    "confidence_level": 0.99,
    "holding_period": 10  # days
}

Monte Carlo VaR

# Monte Carlo VaR configuration
monte_carlo_var_config = {
    "method": "monte_carlo",
    "simulations": 100000,
    "model": {
        "type": "geometric_brownian_motion",
        "parameters": {
            "drift": "historical",
            "volatility": "garch"
        }
    },
    "portfolio_valuation": "full_revaluation",
    "confidence_levels": [0.95, 0.99],
    "holding_period": 10
}

Conditional VaR (Expected Shortfall)

CVaR represents the expected loss given that VaR is exceeded:

  • CVaR at 95% = Average loss in worst 5% of scenarios
  • Required by Basel III/IV for market risk capital
  • More coherent risk measure than VaR

Stress Testing

# Stress test scenarios
stress_tests = {
    "scenarios": [
        {
            "name": "2008 Financial Crisis",
            "shocks": {"equity": -0.40, "credit_spreads": 0.03, "rates": -0.02}
        },
        {
            "name": "COVID-19 March 2020",
            "shocks": {"equity": -0.30, "volatility": 0.50, "credit_spreads": 0.02}
        },
        {
            "name": "Interest Rate Spike",
            "shocks": {"rates": 0.03, "equity": -0.15}
        }
    ],
    "output": ["portfolio_loss", "position_contributions"]
}

Input Schema

{
  "method": "historical|parametric|monte_carlo",
  "portfolio": {
    "positions": "object",
    "total_value": "number"
  },
  "data": {
    "returns": "array or path",
    "period": "string"
  },
  "parameters": {
    "confidence_levels": ["number"],
    "holding_period": "number",
    "volatility_model": "string"
  },
  "stress_testing": {
    "scenarios": ["object"]
  },
  "backtesting": {
    "enabled": "boolean",
    "test_period": "string"
  }
}

Output Schema

{
  "var_results": {
    "confidence_level": {
      "VaR": "number",
      "VaR_percent": "number",
      "CVaR": "number",
      "CVaR_percent": "number"
    }
  },
  "component_var": {
    "position": {
      "marginal_var": "number",
      "component_var": "number",
      "contribution_percent": "number"
    }
  },
  "stress_test_results": {
    "scenario_name": {
      "portfolio_loss": "number",
      "loss_percent": "number"
    }
  },
  "backtesting": {
    "exceptions": "number",
    "exception_rate": "number",
    "traffic_light": "green|yellow|red",
    "kupiec_test": "object",
    "christoffersen_test": "object"
  },
  "risk_attribution": "object"
}

Best Practices

  1. Use multiple methods and compare results
  2. Validate with backtesting regularly
  3. Include fat tails (t-distribution or historical for parametric)
  4. Update parameters (volatility, correlations) frequently
  5. Complement VaR with stress testing
  6. Report CVaR alongside VaR for tail risk
  7. Document all assumptions and limitations

VaR Interpretation

MetricMeaning
VaR 95% = $1M95% confident loss won't exceed $1M
CVaR 95% = $1.5MIf loss exceeds VaR, average loss is $1.5M
Incremental VaRChange in portfolio VaR from adding position
Component VaRPosition's contribution to total VaR

Backtesting Standards

Exceptions (250 days)ZoneInterpretation
0-4GreenModel is acceptable
5-9YellowModel may have issues
10+RedModel needs review

Integration Points

  • Receives simulations from Monte Carlo Engine
  • Connects with Risk Register Manager for risk assessment
  • Supports Risk Analyst agent
  • Integrates with Decision Visualization for risk charts

Best used for

When to use it

The Value at Risk Calculator computes VaR and related risk metrics using parametric (variance-covariance), historical simulation, and Monte Carlo simulation methodologies.

01 · PRE-MEETING

Prepare a decision brief

Turn scattered evidence into a structured case before an investment committee meeting.

02 · TEAM WORKFLOW

Standardize handoffs

Create consistent research outputs across analysts, portfolio managers, and agents.

03 · LIVE UPDATE

Refresh the thesis

Update scenarios after a new catalyst, KPI release, or earnings result.

Community notes

Built to improve with use.

随着 Skill 被使用与评审,反馈将展示在这里。

Leave feedback

Discover more

Related skills

View all
免费开始