
Indiana vs. Rutgers
Kernzusammenfassung
Laut den neuesten Prognosemarktdaten zur Frage „Indiana vs. Rutgers“ haben die Händler einen starken Konsens gebildet.
Derzeit dominiert Indiana vs. Rutgers den Markt mit einer überwältigenden Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit von 9.890%. Spread -4.5 folgt auf dem zweiten Platz mit 9.855%, während Spread -2.5 mit 9.805% auf dem dritten Platz liegt. Das Wettvolumen dieses Marktes hat bereits $292K erreicht, was auf großes Interesse hindeutet.
Aufschlüsselung der Wettbewerbsstufen
Um besser einzuschätzen, wo jedes mögliche Ergebnis steht, lässt sich der Markt anhand der impliziten Wahrscheinlichkeit und der Kontraktpreise in drei Handelsstufen unterteilen:
🥇 Stufe 1: Der dominante Spitzenreiter
- Indiana vs. Rutgers (9.890%): Mit der höchsten Wahrscheinlichkeit wird Indiana vs. Rutgers vom Orderbuch stark favorisiert. Wer auf dieses Ergebnis setzen will, sieht sich einem „Buy Yes“-Kontraktpreis von 9.890¢ gegenüber – ein Zeichen hoher Marktüberzeugung. Allein dieser Kontrakt hat $52.3K Volumen erzeugt.
🥈 Stufe 2: Die wichtigsten Herausforderer
- Spread -4.5 (9.855%): Als tragfähigste Alternative hält Spread -4.5 eine Wahrscheinlichkeit von 9.855%, einzutreten. Seine „Buy Yes“-Anteile werden derzeit zu 9.855¢ gehandelt.
- Spread -2.5 (9.805%): Auf dem dritten Platz mit 9.805% Wahrscheinlichkeit zeigt der Markt eine maßvolle Skepsis gegenüber Spread -2.5 und behandelt es als Außenseiter, sofern sich die Dynamik nicht ändert.
🥉 Stufe 3: Die Long-Tail-Optionen (zusammen ~0%)
Über die Top-3 hinaus wird ein breites Feld an Makrovariablen und Außenseiter-Ergebnissen verfolgt. Auch wenn ihre Einzelwahrscheinlichkeiten niedrig sind, bilden sie wichtige Absicherungen für spekulative Händler:
- Alternative Optionen: Dazu gehören Spread -3.5 (9.800%), Spread -17.5 (9.650%) und Spread -7.5 (9.550%).
- Spekulatives Volumen: Trotz geringer statistischer Wahrscheinlichkeit ziehen bestimmte Long-Tail-Kontrakte wie Spread -16.5 weiterhin nennenswertes Interesse an.
Umfassendes Orderbuch- & Preis-Dashboard
Die folgende Tabelle zeigt die vollständige Aufschlüsselung von Kontraktpreisen, Wahrscheinlichkeiten und Markttiefe für alle gelisteten Ergebnisse dieses Prognose-Pools:
| Rang | Vorhergesagtes Ergebnis | Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit | Handelsvolumen | Yes kaufen (Kosten) | No kaufen (Kosten) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Indiana vs. Rutgers | 9890.0% | $52.3K | 9890¢ | -9790¢ |
| 2 | Spread -4.5 | 9855.0% | — | 9855¢ | -9755¢ |
| 3 | Spread -2.5 | 9805.0% | — | 9805¢ | -9705¢ |
| 4 | Spread -3.5 | 9800.0% | — | 9800¢ | -9700¢ |
| 5 | Spread -17.5 | 9650.0% | $77 | 9650¢ | -9550¢ |
| 6 | Spread -7.5 | 9550.0% | $141 | 9550¢ | -9450¢ |
| 7 | Spread -16.5 | 9480.0% | $263 | 9480¢ | -9380¢ |
| 8 | Spread -14.5 | 9410.0% | $10 | 9410¢ | -9310¢ |
| 9 | Spread -6.5 | 9400.0% | — | 9400¢ | -9300¢ |
| 10 | Spread -20.5 | 9350.0% | $3 | 9350¢ | -9250¢ |
| 11 | Spread -5.5 | 9350.0% | — | 9350¢ | -9250¢ |
| 12 | Spread -10.5 | 9290.0% | $230 | 9290¢ | -9190¢ |
| 13 | Spread -23.5 | 9100.0% | $3.5K | 9100¢ | -9000¢ |
| 14 | Spread -21.5 | 9100.0% | $1.3K | 9100¢ | -9000¢ |
| 15 | O/U 37.5 | 8950.0% | — | 8950¢ | -8850¢ |
| 16 | Spread -9.5 | 8905.0% | $418 | 8905¢ | -8805¢ |
| 17 | Spread -24.5 | 8800.0% | $107.0K | 8800¢ | -8700¢ |
| 18 | Spread -13.5 | 8655.0% | $373 | 8655¢ | -8555¢ |
| 19 | Spread -27.5 | 8200.0% | $787 | 8200¢ | -8100¢ |
| 20 | O/U 43.5 | 7350.0% | $1.0K | 7350¢ | -7250¢ |
| 21 | Spread -30.5 | 7350.0% | $25 | 7350¢ | -7250¢ |
| 22 | Spread -28.5 | 6950.0% | — | 6950¢ | -6850¢ |
| 23 | O/U 45.5 | 6200.0% | — | 6200¢ | -6100¢ |
| 24 | Spread -32.5 | 5950.0% | — | 5950¢ | -5850¢ |
| 25 | Spread -31.5 | 5800.0% | — | 5800¢ | -5700¢ |
| 26 | O/U 63.5 | 5650.0% | — | 5650¢ | -5550¢ |
| 27 | O/U 47.5 | 5450.0% | — | 5450¢ | -5350¢ |
| 28 | O/U 49.5 | 5150.0% | $467 | 5150¢ | -5050¢ |
| 29 | Spread -44.5 | 5150.0% | — | 5150¢ | -5050¢ |
| 30 | Spread -34.5 | 5150.0% | — | 5150¢ | -5050¢ |
| 31 | Spread -8.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 32 | 4Q O/U 16.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 33 | 4Q O/U 19.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 34 | Indiana O/U 23.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 35 | Spread -22.5 | 5050.0% | $206 | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 36 | Spread -18.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 37 | Spread -15.5 | 5050.0% | — | 5050¢ | -4950¢ |
| 38 | Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 39 | Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 40 | Spread -0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 41 | Spread -1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 42 | Spread -2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 43 | Spread -3.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 44 | Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 45 | Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 46 | Spread -6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 47 | Spread -7.5 | 5000.0% | $141 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 48 | Spread -8.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 49 | Spread -10.5 | 5000.0% | $230 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 50 | Spread -13.5 | 5000.0% | $373 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 51 | Spread -14.5 | 5000.0% | $10 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 52 | Spread -16.5 | 5000.0% | $263 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 53 | Spread -17.5 | 5000.0% | $77 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 54 | Spread -20.5 | 5000.0% | $3 | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 55 | O/U 35.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 56 | O/U 69.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 57 | O/U 71.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 58 | 2H O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 59 | 2H O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 60 | 2H O/U 27.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 61 | 2H O/U 30.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 62 | 2H O/U 33.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 63 | 3Q O/U 7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 64 | 3Q O/U 10.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 65 | 3Q O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 66 | 3Q O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 67 | 3Q O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 68 | 4Q O/U 10.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 69 | 4Q O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 70 | Indiana O/U 26.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 71 | Indiana O/U 29.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 72 | Indiana O/U 32.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 73 | Rutgers O/U 26.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 74 | Rutgers O/U 29.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 75 | Rutgers O/U 32.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 76 | Rutgers O/U 35.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 77 | Indiana 2H O/U 11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 78 | Indiana 2H O/U 13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 79 | Indiana 2H O/U 15.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 80 | Rutgers 2H O/U 12.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 81 | Rutgers 2H O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 82 | Rutgers 2H O/U 16.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 83 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 2H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 84 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 85 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - 1H | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 86 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q4 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 87 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q1 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 88 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q2 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 89 | Both Teams to Score a Touchdown - Q3 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 90 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q4 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 91 | Both Teams to Score Points - Q3 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 92 | Kickoff or Punt Return Touchdown | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 93 | Pick-Six Scored | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 94 | Indiana vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 95 | Indiana vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 96 | Indiana vs. Rutgers: Total Touchdowns O/U 7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 97 | Indiana Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 98 | Indiana Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 99 | Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 100 | Indiana Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 101 | Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 102 | Rutgers Total Passing Touchdowns: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 103 | Indiana Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 104 | Indiana Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 105 | Indiana Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 106 | Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 200.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 107 | Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 225.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 108 | Rutgers Total Passing Yards: O/U 250.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 109 | Indiana Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 110 | Indiana Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 111 | Indiana Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 112 | Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 125.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 113 | Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 150.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 114 | Rutgers Total Rushing Yards: O/U 175.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 115 | Indiana Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 116 | Indiana Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 117 | Indiana Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 118 | Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 350.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 119 | Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 375.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 120 | Rutgers Total Scrimmage Yards: O/U 400.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 121 | Indiana 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 122 | Indiana 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 123 | Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 124 | Rutgers 40+ Yard Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 125 | Indiana Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 126 | Indiana Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 127 | Indiana Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 128 | Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 129 | Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 130 | Indiana Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 131 | Indiana Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 132 | Rutgers Field Goals Made: O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 133 | Indiana Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 134 | Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 135 | Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 14.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 136 | Rutgers Total Receptions: O/U 24.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 137 | Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 138 | Indiana Total First Downs: O/U 19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 139 | Indiana Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 140 | Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 141 | Rutgers Total First Downs: O/U 23.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 142 | Indiana Total First Downs: O/U 21.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 143 | Indiana vs. Rutgers: Total 4th Down Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 144 | Indiana vs. Rutgers: Total Defensive/Special Teams Touchdowns O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 145 | Indiana vs. Rutgers: Total Successful Two-Point Conversions O/U 0.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 146 | Spread -19.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 147 | 2H Spread -15.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 148 | 2H Spread -13.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 149 | 2H Spread -12.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 150 | 2H Spread -11.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 151 | 2H Spread -10.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 152 | 2H Spread -8.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 153 | 3Q Spread -9.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 154 | 3Q Spread -7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 155 | 3Q Spread -6.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 156 | 3Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 157 | 3Q Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 158 | 3Q Spread -2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 159 | 4Q Spread -9.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 160 | 4Q Spread -7.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 161 | 4Q Spread -5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 162 | 4Q Spread -4.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 163 | 4Q Spread -2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 164 | 2H Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 165 | Indiana O/U 5.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 166 | Rutgers O/U 1.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 167 | 3Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 168 | 4Q Moneyline | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 169 | Rutgers O/U 2.5 | 5000.0% | — | 5000¢ | -4900¢ |
| 170 | O/U 39.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 171 | O/U 65.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 172 | O/U 75.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 173 | 4Q O/U 7.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 174 | Game Goes to Overtime | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 175 | 4Q Spread -6.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 176 | O/U 41.5 | 4850.0% | — | 4850¢ | -4750¢ |
| 177 | Spread -25.5 | 4800.0% | $1.7K | 4800¢ | -4700¢ |
| 178 | Spread -26.5 | 4750.0% | $1.8K | 4750¢ | -4650¢ |
| 179 | Spread -38.5 | 4700.0% | $9 | 4700¢ | -4600¢ |
| 180 | Spread -29.5 | 4700.0% | — | 4700¢ | -4600¢ |
| 181 | O/U 51.5 | 4300.0% | — | 4300¢ | -4200¢ |
| 182 | Spread -37.5 | 4150.0% | — | 4150¢ | -4050¢ |
| 183 | Spread -40.5 | 3550.0% | — | 3550¢ | -3450¢ |
| 184 | Spread -41.5 | 3500.0% | $4.4K | 3500¢ | -3400¢ |
| 185 | O/U 53.5 | 3450.0% | $548 | 3450¢ | -3350¢ |
| 186 | O/U 59.5 | 3050.0% | — | 3050¢ | -2950¢ |
| 187 | O/U 55.5 | 2600.0% | $10.0K | 2600¢ | -2500¢ |
| 188 | O/U 57.5 | 2050.0% | $45.8K | 2050¢ | -1950¢ |
| 189 | Rutgers O/U 23.5 | 2050.0% | — | 2050¢ | -1950¢ |
| 190 | O/U 61.5 | 1300.0% | — | 1300¢ | -1200¢ |
| 191 | O/U 67.5 | 600.0% | — | 600¢ | -500¢ |
| 192 | O/U 73.5 | 345.0% | $11 | 345¢ | -245¢ |
Abrechnungsregeln
In the upcoming college football game between Indiana and Rutgers, scheduled for October 3 at 8:00PM ET:
This market will resolve to "Indiana" if Indiana win the game.
This market will resolve to "Rutgers" if Rutgers win the game.
Overtime is included if played.
If the game ends in a tie, this market will resolve 50-50.
If the game is postponed, this market will remain open until the game has been completed.
If the game is canceled entirely, with no make-up game, this market will resolve 50-50.
Handelsaktivitäten
Hier sind die Handelsaktivitäten für dieses Event.
Oct 3, 2026
- 11:59 PMHIHighIQDegens$42.59
Bought 90.61 Indiana for 1H Spread: Indiana (-14.5) at 0.47
- 11:58 PMBABaltzeus41$3.00
Bought 5.084746 Rutgers for Spread: Indiana (-27.5) at 0.59
- 11:58 PMNEneutralwave23$47.50
Bought 84.821429 Rutgers for Spread: Indiana (-26.5) at 0.56
- 11:58 PMNInigiri99$3.68
Bought 8 Rutgers for 1H Spread: Indiana (-13.5) at 0.46
- 11:56 PMTEtexaskid$118.00
Bought 236 Indiana for Spread: Indiana (-24.5) at 0.5
- 11:56 PM——$9.01
Bought 17.666667 Indiana for Spread: Indiana (-24.5) at 0.51
- 11:55 PMJAJarod21$12.43
Bought 27.62 Indiana for Spread: Indiana (-26.5) at 0.45
- 11:55 PMJAJarod21$12.42
Bought 27.6 Indiana for Spread: Indiana (-26.5) at 0.45
- 11:55 PMKEkeinbock$2.76
Bought 6 Rutgers for Spread: Indiana (-23.5) at 0.46
- 11:55 PMFOForAndWithYou$102.22
Bought 222.22 Rutgers for Spread: Indiana (-23.5) at 0.46
- 11:55 PMFOForAndWithYou$101.82
Bought 181.82 Rutgers for Spread: Indiana (-26.5) at 0.56
- 11:55 PMMEMeowtchi$45.06
Bought 97.95 Rutgers for Spread: Indiana (-23.5) at 0.46
Wal-Wallets, die auf dieses Event wetten
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Wie lautet der aktuelle Marktkonsens zu „Indiana vs. Rutgers“?
Zum letzten Stand führt Indiana vs. Rutgers mit einer Gewinnwahrscheinlichkeit von 9.890%, gefolgt von Spread -4.5 mit 9.855% und Spread -2.5 mit 9.805%. Das Gesamthandelsvolumen erreicht $292K, was hohe Liquidität und Beteiligung signalisiert.
