
Greater Manchester Mayoral Election: Most 1st Preference Votes
核心摘要
根据「Greater Manchester Mayoral Election: Most 1st Preference Votes」的最新预测市场数据,交易者已形成强烈共识。
目前,Bev Craig 以压倒性的 84.5% 获胜概率主导市场;Dan Barker 以 6.8% 位居第二,Hannah Spencer 以 2.9% 排名第三。该市场的下注量已达 $65.9K,反映出市场的高度关注。
竞争梯队拆解
为了更好地评估各潜在结果的位置,可依据隐含概率与合约定价将市场划分为三个明显的交易梯队:
🥇 第一梯队:绝对领跑者
- Bev Craig (84.5%):Bev Craig 目前拥有最高概率,深受订单簿青睐。看好该结果的交易者面对的「Buy Yes」合约价为 85¢,显示出市场的高度确信。仅该合约就已产生 $24.5K 的成交量。
🥈 第二梯队:主要挑战者
- Dan Barker (6.8%):作为最可行的替代选项,Dan Barker 保持着 6.8% 的成真概率,其「Buy Yes」份额目前成交价为 7¢。
- Hannah Spencer (2.9%):以 2.9% 的概率位列第三,市场对 Hannah Spencer 持谨慎怀疑态度,除非势头转变,否则视其为外围黑马。
🥉 第三梯队:长尾选项(合计约 5.8%)
在前三名之外,还有大量宏观变量与冷门结果被持续追踪。尽管单个概率偏低,但它们是投机交易者的重要对冲:
- 替代选项:包括 Jake Austin (2.7%)、Paul Dennett (2.2%),以及 Arooj Shah (1.6%)。
- 投机成交:尽管统计概率偏低,像 Kate Green 这类长尾合约仍吸引着可观的关注。
完整订单簿与定价面板
下表列出了该预测池中所有结果的合约价格、概率与市场深度的完整拆解:
| 排名 | 预测结果 | 获胜概率 | 成交量 | 买入 Yes(成本) | 买入 No(成本) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bev Craig | 84.5% | $24.5K | 85¢ | 16¢ |
| 2 | Dan Barker | 6.8% | $21.8K | 7¢ | 93¢ |
| 3 | Hannah Spencer | 2.9% | $2.4K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 4 | Jake Austin | 2.7% | $1.1K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 5 | Paul Dennett | 2.2% | $1.1K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 6 | Arooj Shah | 1.6% | $1.8K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 7 | Kate Green | 1.4% | $1.5K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 8 | Nick Buckley | 1.3% | $1.1K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 9 | Geraldine Coggins | 0.5% | $2.8K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 10 | Marlon Scott West | 0.5% | $1.1K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 11 | Laura Evans | 0.5% | $1.1K | 1¢ | 100¢ |
裁决规则
The 2026 Greater Manchester mayoral election is currently scheduled to be held on July 30, 2026.
This market will resolve according to the candidate who wins the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the specified election.
If two candidates tie for receiving the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the specified election, this market will resolve according to the candidate who wins the specified election.
If the result of this election isn't known by June 30, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, the market will resolve to "Other".
The primary resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting; however, if there is any ambiguity in the results, this market will resolve according to official information from Greater Manchester Combined Authority (https://www.gmelects.org.uk/).
AI 估值分析:发现市场错误定价与 EV 差
人群共识与投机成交塑造了更宏观的预测市场,而我们的量化算法提供了数据驱动的反向视角。通过分析基本面信号、底层趋势与历史分布,我们的 AI 估值模型为每个结果独立测算出一个「公允价值」概率。
将该公允价值与当前交易价值对比,可揭示出重大背离——即期望值(EV)差。正 EV 差代表统计上被低估的结果,而负 EV 差则提示市场可能存在反应过度。
顶级 AI Alpha 与错误定价套利机会
根据最新一轮数据模型测算,以下几个关键合约存在显著偏离:
- 最被高估的结果:Bev Craig 当前交易价为 84.5%,但我们的 AI 测算其公允价值仅为 59.2%,形成 -25.3% 的较大负 EV 差,表明人群可能过度炒作该结果、把溢价推得过高。
- 最佳价值标的(最高 EV):我们的模型将 Marlon Scott West 识别为盘面上最具价值的机会。市场仅给予其 0.5% 的交易概率,而我们 AI 的公允价值评估为 34.7%——形成可观的 +34.1% EV 差。
- 被忽视的黑马:其他值得注意的偏离包括 Laura Evans(EV 差:+31.4%)以及 Jake Austin(EV 差:+29.6%)。尽管我们的预测模型给予更强的统计支撑,这些长尾机会仍被实时订单簿大幅低估。
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bev Craig | 84.5% | 59.2% | -25.3% |
| Dan Barker | 6.8% | 15.4% | +8.7% |
| Hannah Spencer | 2.9% | 6.4% | +3.5% |
| Jake Austin | 2.7% | 32.3% | +29.6% |
| Paul Dennett | 2.2% | 31.7% | +29.5% |
| Arooj Shah | 1.6% | 26.4% | +24.8% |
| Kate Green | 1.4% | 28.6% | +27.2% |
| Nick Buckley | 1.3% | 29.3% | +28.1% |
| Geraldine Coggins | 0.5% | 0.1% | -0.5% |
| Marlon Scott WestBest EV | 0.5% | 34.7% | +34.1% |
| Laura Evans | 0.5% | 31.9% | +31.4% |
交易动态
以下是该事件的交易动态。
Jul 29, 2026
- 06:49 PMELElias.Thornwell$0.80
Bought 40 No for Will Bev Craig win the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the 2026 Greater Manchester Mayoral Election? at 0.02
- 04:36 AMLIliuruijin$9.80
Sold 10 Yes for Will Bev Craig win the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the 2026 Greater Manchester Mayoral Election? at 0.98
- 12:05 AMFXFxnEdge$9.41
Bought 9.6 Yes for Will Bev Craig win the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the 2026 Greater Manchester Mayoral Election? at 0.98
Jul 28, 2026
- 09:56 PMELElias.Thornwell$1.04
Bought 52.16 No for Will Bev Craig win the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the 2026 Greater Manchester Mayoral Election? at 0.02
- 06:12 PMTZtzquantalpha001$54.90
Sold 55.45 No for Will Dan Barker win the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the 2026 Greater Manchester Mayoral Election? at 0.99
- 05:16 PMFXFxnEdge$103.68
Bought 103.68 No for Will Laura Evans win the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the 2026 Greater Manchester Mayoral Election? at 1
- 05:15 PMFXFxnEdge$33.90
Bought 33.9 No for Will Paul Dennett win the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the 2026 Greater Manchester Mayoral Election? at 1
- 05:15 PMFXFxnEdge$571.00
Bought 571 No for Will Dan Barker win the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the 2026 Greater Manchester Mayoral Election? at 1
- 05:15 PMFXFxnEdge$1,782.61
Bought 1782.61 No for Will Dan Barker win the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the 2026 Greater Manchester Mayoral Election? at 1
- 05:14 PMFXFxnEdge$27.21
Bought 27.21 No for Will Dan Barker win the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the 2026 Greater Manchester Mayoral Election? at 1
- 05:13 PMJAjast24$1.45
Bought 1.454333 No for Will Dan Barker win the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the 2026 Greater Manchester Mayoral Election? at 1
- 05:04 PMHEhealingNina9$2.43
Bought 2.427 No for Will Dan Barker win the greatest number of valid first preference votes in the 2026 Greater Manchester Mayoral Election? at 1
正在押注该事件的鲸鱼钱包
常见问题
当前市场对「Greater Manchester Mayoral Election: Most 1st Preference Votes」的共识是什么?
截至最新更新,Bev Craig 以 84.5% 的获胜概率领跑,其次是 Dan Barker(6.8%),以及 Hannah Spencer(2.9%)。该市场总成交量已达 $65.9K,显示出充足的流动性与高交易参与度。
AI 公允价值与实时市场交易价值有何不同?
实时市场交易价值反映的是公众情绪、订单簿动能与投机资金。我们的 AI 公允价值则由量化模型独立计算,剔除情绪炒作、专注底层数据。两者出现显著背离时即形成 EV 差,提示市场对某个结果可能存在错误定价。
当前哪个结果的期望值(EV)最高?
最新一轮测算显示,Marlon Scott West 是最显著的错误定价。市场对其隐含概率仅给到 0.5%,而我们的 AI 测算其公允价值为 34.7%——形成 +34.1% 的期望值差,是该市场中最具价值的标的。
市场共识是否对某个结果反应过度?
是的——数据显示市场对 Bev Craig 存在明显的反应过度。人群把其实时交易价值推高至 84.5%,但我们的公允价值评估认为其真实概率仅为 59.2%,形成 -25.3% 的负 EV 差,表明该合约被高估。
长尾数据中是否藏有高价值的黑马选项?
当然有。除了头部结果之外,我们的模型在排名靠后的选项中发现了被低估的潜力。Laura Evans 拥有 +31.4% 的正 EV 差,Jake Austin 则为 +29.6%。尽管量化层面更有支撑,这些合约仍被实时订单簿低估。
