
Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier
核心摘要
根據「Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier」的最新預測市場資料,交易者已形成強烈共識。
目前,Map Handicap: MOUZ (-1.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+1.5) 以壓倒性的 5,750% 獲勝機率主導市場;Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 以 4,950% 位居第二,Map 2 Rounds Handicap: MOUZ (-3.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+3.5) 以 4,950% 排名第三。該市場的下注量已達 $6.8K,反映出市場的高度關注。
競爭梯隊拆解
為了更好地評估各潛在結果的位置,可依據隱含機率與合約定價將市場劃分為三個明顯的交易梯隊:
🥇 第一梯隊:絕對領跑者
- Map Handicap: MOUZ (-1.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+1.5) (5,750%):Map Handicap: MOUZ (-1.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+1.5) 目前擁有最高機率,深受訂單簿青睞。看好該結果的交易者面對的「Buy Yes」合約價為 5,750¢,顯示出市場的高度確信。僅該合約就已產生 $55 的成交量。
🥈 第二梯隊:主要挑戰者
- Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 (4,950%):作為最可行的替代選項,Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 保持著 4,950% 的成真機率,其「Buy Yes」份額目前成交價為 4,950¢。
- Map 2 Rounds Handicap: MOUZ (-3.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+3.5) (4,950%):以 4,950% 的機率位列第三,市場對 Map 2 Rounds Handicap: MOUZ (-3.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+3.5) 持謹慎懷疑態度,除非勢頭轉變,否則視其為外圍黑馬。
🥉 第三梯隊:長尾選項(合計約 0%)
在前三名之外,還有大量宏觀變數與冷門結果被持續追蹤。儘管單個機率偏低,但它們是投機交易者的重要對沖:
- 替代選項:包括 Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 (4,900%)、Map 1 Rounds Handicap: MOUZ (-3.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+3.5) (4,850%),以及 Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 (4,850%)。
- 投機成交:儘管統計機率偏低,像 Map 3 Rounds Handicap: MOUZ (-3.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+3.5) 這類長尾合約仍吸引著可觀的關注。
完整訂單簿與定價面板
下表列出了該預測池中所有結果的合約價格、機率與市場深度的完整拆解:
| 排名 | 預測結果 | 獲勝機率 | 成交量 | 買入 Yes(成本) | 買入 No(成本) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Map Handicap: MOUZ (-1.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+1.5) | 5750.0% | $55 | 5750¢ | -5650¢ |
| 2 | Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 3 | Map 2 Rounds Handicap: MOUZ (-3.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+3.5) | 4950.0% | — | 4950¢ | -4850¢ |
| 4 | Map 2 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 4900.0% | — | 4900¢ | -4800¢ |
| 5 | Map 1 Rounds Handicap: MOUZ (-3.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+3.5) | 4850.0% | — | 4850¢ | -4750¢ |
| 6 | Map 3 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5 | 4850.0% | — | 4850¢ | -4750¢ |
| 7 | Map 3 Rounds Handicap: MOUZ (-3.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+3.5) | 4800.0% | — | 4800¢ | -4700¢ |
| 8 | O/U 2.5 Games | 3500.0% | $50 | 3500¢ | -3400¢ |
| 9 | Map 1 Winner | 2800.0% | $2 | 2800¢ | -2700¢ |
| 10 | Map 2 Winner | 2400.0% | — | 2400¢ | -2300¢ |
| 11 | Match Winner | 1650.0% | $6.7K | 1650¢ | -1550¢ |
裁決規則
This market refers to the Counter-Strike Round of 32 match between Nuclear TigeRES and MOUZ in the BLAST Bounty Qualifier, initially scheduled for July 21 at 11:00AM ET.
This market will resolve to "Nuclear TigeRES" if Nuclear TigeRES win the match against MOUZ.
This market will resolve to "MOUZ" if MOUZ win the match against Nuclear TigeRES.
If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50.
If the match begins but is not completed, and one team wins due to the opponent's forfeiture, disqualification, or walkover, this market will resolve to the team who wins.
If the match ends in a forfeit, disqualification, or walkover (team withdraws before the start and the other wins automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50.
The resolution source for this market will be official information from https://hltv.org. However, if https://hltv.org has not published final results within 2 hours after the event’s conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead including video evidence.
In cases where a team’s listed name includes minor discrepancies from the resolution source, this market will resolve based on the underlying real-world match rather than exact name matching. Recognizable abbreviations, alternate or erroneous spellings, sponsor tags, affiliate or academy designations, regional identifiers, and minor formatting differences will be treated as referring to the same team, provided the intended team can be clearly and uniquely identified within the relevant competition. If a listed team name has no reasonable connection to any participating team, or if it matches or could reasonably refer to another team in the same competition such that the intended team cannot be unambiguously determined, this market will resolve 50-50.
交易動態
以下是該事件的交易動態。
Jul 19, 2026
- 06:51 PMSSsssssmm$16.60
Bought 20 MOUZ for Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier at 0.83
- 06:40 PMWAWanfeng123$1.00
Bought 1.190475 MOUZ for Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier at 0.84
- 05:59 PMSHshisushi$15.12
Bought 18 MOUZ for Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier at 0.84
- 05:30 PMSIsignalso$2.52
Bought 3 MOUZ for Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier at 0.84
- 04:13 PMMRmrpeanutbutter21322$9.50
Bought 55.882351 Nuclear TigeRES for Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier at 0.17
- 04:05 PMWEweathergonnagiveyouup$7.00
Bought 41.176469 Nuclear TigeRES for Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier at 0.17
- 04:05 PM——$7.00
Bought 41.176469 Nuclear TigeRES for Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier at 0.17
- 04:04 PMSKskyman44$38.56
Bought 241 Nuclear TigeRES for Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier at 0.16
- 03:48 PMFHfhj414$10.00
Bought 11.7647 MOUZ for Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier at 0.85
- 03:18 PM0X0xFC095c3deCA$11.90
Bought 14 MOUZ for Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier at 0.85
- 03:16 PMSIsignalso$1.70
Bought 2 MOUZ for Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier at 0.85
- 03:16 PMSIsignalso$4.25
Bought 5 MOUZ for Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier at 0.85
正在押注該事件的鯨魚錢包
常見問題
目前市場對「Counter-Strike: Nuclear TigeRES vs MOUZ (BO3) - BLAST Bounty Qualifier」的共識是什麼?
截至最新更新,Map Handicap: MOUZ (-1.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+1.5) 以 5,750% 的獲勝機率領跑,其次是 Map 1 Total Rounds: Over/Under 21.5(4,950%),以及 Map 2 Rounds Handicap: MOUZ (-3.5) vs Nuclear TigeRES (+3.5)(4,950%)。該市場總成交量已達 $6.8K,顯示出充足的流動性與高交易參與度。
