
Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027?
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027?”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, No is dominating the market with an overwhelming 90.5% chance of winning. Yes follows in second place at 9.5%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $20.9M, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- No (90.5%): Currently commanding the highest probability, No is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 91¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Yes (9.5%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Yes maintains a 9.5% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 10¢.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No | 90.5% | — | 91¢ | 10¢ |
| 2 | Yes | 9.5% | — | 10¢ | 91¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the Islamic Republic of Iran’s current ruling regime is overthrown, collapsed, or otherwise ceases to govern by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
This requires a broad consensus of reporting indicating that core structures of the Islamic Republic (e.g. the office of the Supreme Leader, the Guardian Council, IRGC control under clerical authority) have been dissolved, incapacitated, or replaced by a fundamentally different governing system or otherwise lost de facto power over a majority of the population of Iran. This could occur via revolution, civil war, military coup, or voluntary abdication, but only qualifies if the Islamic Republic no longer exercises sovereign power.
Routine political events such as elections, reforms, or leadership succession do not qualify. Internal coups or power shifts that preserve the Islamic Republic’s core structures also do not qualify. Only a clear break in continuity—such as a new provisional government, revolutionary council, or constitution replacing the Islamic Republic will qualify.
Partial loss of territory or challenges from rebel or exile groups will not qualify unless the Islamic Republic no longer administers the majority of the Iranian population within Iran.
The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome No currently trades at 90.5%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 80.6%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -9.9%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | 90.5% | 80.6% | -9.9% |
| Yes | 9.5% | 1.0% | -8.5% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Jun 30, 2026
- 07:17 AMGEGeorgegu$310.31
Bought 341 No for Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027? at 0.91
- 07:15 AMAUAudreyan$275.73
Bought 303 No for Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027? at 0.91
- 07:06 AMHUhuwd$9.88
Sold 10.98 No for Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027? at 0.9
- 06:58 AMSOSourbreadfan$32.00
Bought 35.164834 No for Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027? at 0.91
- 06:31 AM0X0x6879f9887D9e2972322B582376a9A1A9d95C7406-1768245737937$0.47
Sold 5.21 Yes for Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027? at 0.09
- 05:07 AMHOHoldenaintFolden$39.60
Sold 440 Yes for Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027? at 0.09
- 03:53 AMWAwalnutpeanut$41.59
Sold 462.1 Yes for Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027? at 0.09
- 03:41 AMWAwalnutpeanut$46.21
Bought 462.1 Yes for Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027? at 0.1
- 03:41 AM7N7n193glg3$1.46
Bought 14.6 Yes for Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027? at 0.1
- 02:15 AM0X0x2b47DE3FB9F2F0F1DBDA7BF202A638e4fCC027fE-1768948903813$1.55
Sold 17.24 Yes for Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027? at 0.09
- 01:38 AMENengineers$316.68
Bought 348 No for Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027? at 0.91
- 01:34 AMBLBlakeban$276.64
Bought 304 No for Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027? at 0.91
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "Will the Iranian regime fall before 2027?"?
As of the latest update, No leads the field as the frontrunner with a 90.5% win probability, followed by Yes at 9.5%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $20.9M, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around No. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 90.5%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 80.6%, a negative EV Gap of -9.9% that signals the contract is overpriced.
