
Republican Presidential Nominee 2028
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Republican Presidential Nominee 2028”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, J.D. Vance is dominating the market with an overwhelming 37.8% chance of winning. Marco Rubio follows in second place at 21.5%, while Tucker Carlson sits in third with 4.6%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $666M, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- J.D. Vance (37.8%): Currently commanding the highest probability, J.D. Vance is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 38¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $14.1M in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Marco Rubio (21.5%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Marco Rubio maintains a 21.5% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 21¢.
- Tucker Carlson (4.6%): Sitting in third place with a 4.6% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Tucker Carlson, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~36.3%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes Donald Trump Jr. (2.6%), Ron DeSantis (2.2%), and Donald Trump (2%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Vivek Ramaswamy are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | J.D. Vance | 37.8% | $14.1M | 38¢ | 62¢ |
| 2 | Marco Rubio | 21.4% | $9.5M | 21¢ | 79¢ |
| 3 | Tucker Carlson | 4.5% | $11.6M | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 4 | Donald Trump Jr. | 2.5% | $9.0M | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 5 | Ron DeSantis | 2.1% | $14.4M | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 6 | Donald Trump | 1.9% | $8.9M | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 7 | Vivek Ramaswamy | 1.3% | $15.8M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 8 | Glenn Youngkin | 1.1% | $8.2M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 9 | Greg Abbott | 1.1% | $20.6M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 10 | Tulsi Gabbard | 1.1% | $13.4M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 11 | Ivanka Trump | 1.1% | $8.0M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 12 | Ted Cruz | 0.9% | $18.5M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 13 | Elon Musk | 0.9% | $28.4M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 14 | Rand Paul | 0.9% | $19.0M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 15 | Marjorie Taylor Greene | 0.9% | $6.4M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 16 | Thomas Massie | 0.9% | $5.7M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 17 | Nikki Haley | 0.9% | $10.0M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 18 | Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | 0.9% | $16.5M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 19 | Brian Kemp | 0.9% | $17.3M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 20 | Josh Hawley | 0.9% | $19.9M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 21 | Katie Britt | 0.9% | $28.5M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 22 | Tom Brady | 0.9% | $32.7M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 23 | Steve Bannon | 0.9% | $22.4M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 24 | Kim Kardashian | 0.9% | $28.0M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 25 | Sarah Huckabee Sanders | 0.8% | $31.9M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 26 | Byron Donalds | 0.8% | $44.1M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 27 | Elise Stefanik | 0.8% | $27.5M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 28 | Matt Gaetz | 0.8% | $19.7M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 29 | Erika Kirk | 0.8% | $18.3M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 30 | Eric Trump | 0.8% | $9.6M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 31 | Joe Kent | 0.8% | $7.9M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 32 | Pete Hegseth | 0.8% | $8.3M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 33 | John Thune | 0.7% | $35.3M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 34 | Kristi Noem | 0.7% | $34.7M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 35 | Mike Pence | 0.7% | $41.8M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the named individual wins and accepts the 2028 nomination of the Republican Party for U.S. president. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of official Republican Party sources.
Any replacement of the Republican nominee before election day will not change the resolution of the market.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Marco Rubio currently trades at 21.5%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 17.5%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -4%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Tucker Carlson as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 4.6% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 17.4% — yielding an impressive +12.9% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Pete Hegseth (EV Gap: +10.2%) and Tulsi Gabbard (EV Gap: +7.1%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| J.D. Vance | 37.8% | 38.8% | +1.0% |
| Marco Rubio | 21.4% | 17.5% | -4.0% |
| Tucker CarlsonBest EV | 4.5% | 17.4% | +12.9% |
| Donald Trump Jr. | 2.5% | 2.7% | +0.1% |
| Ron DeSantis | 2.1% | 2.8% | +0.6% |
| Donald Trump | 1.9% | 3.7% | +1.8% |
| Vivek Ramaswamy | 1.3% | 1.1% | -0.1% |
| Glenn Youngkin | 1.1% | 1.1% | 0.0% |
| Greg Abbott | 1.1% | 0.7% | -0.5% |
| Tulsi Gabbard | 1.1% | 8.1% | +7.1% |
| Ivanka Trump | 1.1% | 0.7% | -0.3% |
| Ted Cruz | 0.9% | 0.6% | -0.3% |
| Elon Musk | 0.9% | 0.9% | -0.0% |
| Rand Paul | 0.9% | 0.9% | -0.0% |
| Marjorie Taylor Greene | 0.9% | 1.1% | +0.2% |
| Thomas Massie | 0.9% | 1.1% | +0.2% |
| Nikki Haley | 0.9% | 0.7% | -0.2% |
| Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | 0.9% | 5.2% | +4.3% |
| Brian Kemp | 0.9% | 0.7% | -0.2% |
| Josh Hawley | 0.9% | 0.7% | -0.1% |
| Katie Britt | 0.9% | 0.7% | -0.1% |
| Tom Brady | 0.9% | 1.0% | +0.1% |
| Steve Bannon | 0.9% | 0.6% | -0.3% |
| Kim Kardashian | 0.9% | 0.8% | -0.1% |
| Sarah Huckabee Sanders | 0.8% | 0.7% | -0.0% |
| Byron Donalds | 0.8% | 1.0% | +0.3% |
| Elise Stefanik | 0.8% | 0.4% | -0.3% |
| Matt Gaetz | 0.8% | 0.6% | -0.1% |
| Erika Kirk | 0.8% | 0.5% | -0.3% |
| Eric Trump | 0.8% | 0.7% | -0.0% |
| Joe Kent | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.0% |
| Pete Hegseth | 0.8% | 10.9% | +10.2% |
| John Thune | 0.7% | 0.7% | +0.0% |
| Kristi Noem | 0.7% | 0.6% | -0.1% |
| Mike Pence | 0.7% | 0.6% | -0.0% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Jun 29, 2026
- 08:03 PMHKhklcrypt$2.03
Bought 2.04625 No for Will Steve Bannon win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination? at 0.99
- 08:02 PMHKhklcrypt$2.03
Bought 2.04625 No for Will Steve Bannon win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination? at 0.99
- 08:00 PMHKhklcrypt$2.03
Bought 2.04625 No for Will Steve Bannon win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination? at 0.99
- 07:58 PMJEjessecastillo$0.90
Sold 90 Yes for Will John Thune win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination? at 0.01
- 07:55 PM0X0xA3af760e15e6B6bd3C43d8cf2AE6952F0a9bB7a6-1720875307802$23.18
Bought 61 Yes for Will J.D. Vance win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination? at 0.38
- 07:53 PMKAkarenpeterson$0.71
Sold 71 Yes for Will Erika Kirk win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination? at 0.01
- 07:51 PM——$2.35
Bought 2.376571 No for Will Pete Hegseth win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination? at 0.99
- 07:43 PM0X0xA3af760e15e6B6bd3C43d8cf2AE6952F0a9bB7a6-1720875307802$19.76
Sold 52 Yes for Will J.D. Vance win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination? at 0.38
- 07:42 PM——$0.13
Sold 0.13 No for Will John Thune win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination? at 0.99
- 07:41 PM——$1.30
Bought 1.311777 No for Will Rand Paul win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination? at 0.99
- 07:41 PM——$2.17
Bought 2.1875 No for Will Brian Kemp win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination? at 0.99
- 07:38 PMHKhklcrypt$1.74
Bought 1.754 No for Will Tom Brady win the 2028 Republican presidential nomination? at 0.99
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "Republican Presidential Nominee 2028"?
As of the latest update, J.D. Vance leads the field as the frontrunner with a 37.8% win probability, followed by Marco Rubio at 21.5% and Tucker Carlson at 4.6%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $666M, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Tucker Carlson as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 4.6% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 17.4% — an Expected Value gap of +12.9%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Marco Rubio. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 21.5%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 17.5%, a negative EV Gap of -4% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Pete Hegseth holds a positive EV Gap of +10.2%, and Tulsi Gabbard shows +7.1%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
