
Nobel Peace Prize Winner 2026
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Nobel Peace Prize Winner 2026”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms is dominating the market with an overwhelming 16.2% chance of winning. Save the Children follows in second place at 7.4%, while Yulia Navalnaya sits in third with 5.5%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $25.1M, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms (16.2%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 16¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $37.1K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Save the Children (7.4%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Save the Children maintains a 7.4% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 7¢.
- Yulia Navalnaya (5.5%): Sitting in third place with a 5.5% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Yulia Navalnaya, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~71%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes Sara Al-Saqqa (5.3%), Committee to Protect Journalists (4.9%), and International Court of Justice (4.9%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like UNRWA are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms | 16.2% | $37.1K | 16¢ | 84¢ |
| 2 | Save the Children | 7.3% | $18.6K | 7¢ | 93¢ |
| 3 | Yulia Navalnaya | 5.5% | $315.4K | 6¢ | 95¢ |
| 4 | Sara Al-Saqqa | 5.3% | $8.5K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 5 | Committee to Protect Journalists | 4.9% | $7.4K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 6 | International Court of Justice | 4.9% | $918.8K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 7 | UNRWA | 4.6% | $2.1M | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 8 | Hussam Abu Safiya | 2.4% | $9.5K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 9 | Donald Trump | 1.8% | $5.3M | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 10 | Pope Leo XIV | 1.8% | $843.2K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 11 | Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani | 1.5% | $804.7K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 12 | Volodymyr Zelenskyy | 1.3% | $859.3K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 13 | Greta Thunberg | 1.1% | $1.5M | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 14 | World Central Kitchen | 0.9% | $5.0K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 15 | António Guterres | 0.9% | $643.8K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 16 | Chow Hang-tung | 0.9% | $14.7K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 17 | UNHCR | 0.7% | $6.2K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 18 | Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya | 0.6% | $3.6K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 19 | Reporters Without Borders | 0.6% | $7.3K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 20 | ICRC | 0.5% | $4.6K | 1¢ | 100¢ |
| 21 | Julian Assange | 0.4% | $859.1K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 22 | Ahmed al-Sharaa | 0.3% | $1.3M | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 23 | Xi Jinping | 0.1% | $1.5M | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 24 | Narendra Modi | 0.1% | $692.8K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 25 | Elon Musk | 0.1% | $1.2M | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 26 | Vladimir Putin | 0.1% | $956.0K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 27 | Khaled Mashal | 0.1% | $909.6K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 28 | Benjamin Netanyahu | 0.1% | $753.7K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 29 | Recep Tayyip Erdoğan | 0.1% | $1.1M | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 30 | Charlie Kirk | 0.1% | $1.3M | 0¢ | 100¢ |
| 31 | Mohammed bin Salman | 0.1% | $1.2M | 0¢ | 100¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve according to the winner of the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, as announced by the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
If multiple listed individuals or entities jointly receive the prize, the market will resolve to a single winner. If Donald Trump, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Benjamin Netanyahu, Vladimir Putin, or Elon Musk are among the recipients, the market will resolve to the highest-ranked among them in that exact order of precedence. If none of those five are among the winners and the prize is awarded jointly to at least one listed individual and at least one listed organization, the market will resolve in favor of the individual. If no prioritized individuals are among the winners and all listed recipients are of the same type (all individuals or all organizations), the market will resolve to the person whose last name, or the entity’s name, comes first in alphabetical order as listed in this market.
If no official announcement regarding the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize has been made by March 31, 2027, 11:59 PM ET, this market will resolve to "Other."
The resolution source for this market will be the first official announcement from the Norwegian Nobel Committee.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Reporters Without Borders currently trades at 0.6%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 0.1%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -0.5%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Hussam Abu Safiya as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 2.4% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 12.1% — yielding an impressive +9.8% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani (EV Gap: +8.6%) and Volodymyr Zelenskyy (EV Gap: +7.3%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms | 16.2% | 19.0% | +2.8% |
| Save the Children | 7.3% | 12.5% | +5.2% |
| Yulia Navalnaya | 5.5% | 10.3% | +4.8% |
| Sara Al-Saqqa | 5.3% | 10.8% | +5.5% |
| Committee to Protect Journalists | 4.9% | 11.1% | +6.2% |
| International Court of Justice | 4.9% | 10.7% | +5.9% |
| UNRWA | 4.6% | 9.4% | +4.8% |
| Hussam Abu SafiyaBest EV | 2.4% | 12.1% | +9.8% |
| Donald Trump | 1.8% | 5.5% | +3.7% |
| Pope Leo XIV | 1.8% | 5.4% | +3.6% |
| Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani | 1.5% | 10.1% | +8.6% |
| Volodymyr Zelenskyy | 1.3% | 8.6% | +7.3% |
| Greta Thunberg | 1.1% | 5.2% | +4.1% |
| World Central Kitchen | 0.9% | 2.9% | +2.0% |
| António Guterres | 0.9% | 0.9% | +0.1% |
| Chow Hang-tung | 0.9% | 2.0% | +1.1% |
| UNHCR | 0.7% | 0.6% | -0.1% |
| Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya | 0.6% | 0.8% | +0.1% |
| Reporters Without Borders | 0.6% | 0.1% | -0.5% |
| ICRC | 0.5% | 0.3% | -0.2% |
| Julian Assange | 0.4% | 0.6% | +0.3% |
| Ahmed al-Sharaa | 0.3% | 1.0% | +0.8% |
| Xi Jinping | 0.1% | 2.2% | +2.0% |
| Narendra Modi | 0.1% | 1.8% | +1.6% |
| Elon Musk | 0.1% | 1.0% | +0.9% |
| Vladimir Putin | 0.1% | 1.0% | +0.9% |
| Khaled Mashal | 0.1% | 1.0% | +0.9% |
| Benjamin Netanyahu | 0.1% | 1.0% | +0.9% |
| Recep Tayyip Erdoğan | 0.1% | 1.0% | +0.9% |
| Charlie Kirk | 0.1% | 1.0% | +0.9% |
| Mohammed bin Salman | 0.1% | 1.0% | +0.9% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Sep 28, 2026
- 07:27 PMCOCoinJester99$13.55
Sold 84.7 Yes for Will Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026? at 0.16
- 07:25 PMDUDuneMentat$12.63
Bought 15.035715 No for Will Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026? at 0.84
- 07:25 PMTHthor666$21.55
Sold 134.7 Yes for Will Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026? at 0.16
- 07:25 PMMAmarksman$9.52
Bought 11.33 No for Will Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026? at 0.84
- 07:25 PMMAmarksman$120.96
Bought 144 No for Will Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026? at 0.84
- 07:25 PMNEneutralwave23$4.74
Sold 4.79 No for Will Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026? at 0.99
- 07:24 PMNEneutralwave23$4.75
Bought 4.797142 No for Will Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026? at 0.99
- 07:06 PMLOLomrore$10.28
Sold 10.38 No for Will Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026? at 0.99
- 06:57 PM——$0.06
Sold 0.37 Yes for Will Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026? at 0.16
- 06:43 PM-F-FROMTHEFUTURE-$2.21
Bought 110.25 Yes for Will Donald Trump win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026? at 0.02
- 06:43 PM-F-FROMTHEFUTURE-$3.74
Bought 187 Yes for Will Donald Trump win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026? at 0.02
- 06:43 PM-F-FROMTHEFUTURE-$4.07
Bought 203.46 Yes for Will Donald Trump win the Nobel Peace Prize in 2026? at 0.02
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "Nobel Peace Prize Winner 2026"?
As of the latest update, Sudan's Emergency Response Rooms leads the field as the frontrunner with a 16.2% win probability, followed by Save the Children at 7.4% and Yulia Navalnaya at 5.5%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $25.1M, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Hussam Abu Safiya as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 2.4% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 12.1% — an Expected Value gap of +9.8%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Reporters Without Borders. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 0.6%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 0.1%, a negative EV Gap of -0.5% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani holds a positive EV Gap of +8.6%, and Volodymyr Zelenskyy shows +7.3%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
