
IPOs before 2027?
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “IPOs before 2027?”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Anthropic is dominating the market with an overwhelming 98% chance of winning. Ledger follows in second place at 6.1%, while Celonis sits in third with 5.7%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $7.7M, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Anthropic (98%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Anthropic is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 98¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $767.6K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Ledger (6.1%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Ledger maintains a 6.1% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 6¢.
- Celonis (5.7%): Sitting in third place with a 5.7% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Celonis, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~0%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes Perplexity (5.4%), Remote (4.6%), and Applied Intuition (3.5%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Rippling are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthropic | 98.0% | $767.6K | 98¢ | 2¢ |
| 2 | Ledger | 6.0% | $515.4K | 6¢ | 94¢ |
| 3 | Celonis | 5.7% | $211.9K | 6¢ | 94¢ |
| 4 | Perplexity | 5.3% | $1.8K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 5 | Remote | 4.6% | $56.7K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 6 | Applied Intuition | 3.5% | $207.0K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 7 | Rippling | 3.3% | $122.8K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 8 | Ripple Labs | 3.1% | $159.0K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 9 | Revolut | 2.9% | $61.9K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 10 | Vanta | 2.9% | $150.1K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 11 | Anysphere (Cursor) | 2.9% | $107.0K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 12 | Canva | 2.9% | $39.6K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 13 | Databricks | 2.8% | $496.3K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 14 | Anduril | 2.6% | $366.4K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 15 | ByteDance | 2.6% | $34.1K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 16 | Discord | 2.5% | $500.5K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 17 | Fannie Mae | 2.4% | $182.9K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 18 | Anduril Industries | 2.3% | $61.8K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 19 | Stripe | 2.1% | $273.4K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 20 | OpenAI | 2.1% | $648.2K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 21 | Mistral AI | 1.9% | $168.7K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 22 | Waymo | 1.9% | $54.8K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 23 | Epic Games | 1.7% | $99.8K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 24 | WHOOP | 1.7% | $9.5K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 25 | Ramp | 1.7% | $158.5K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 26 | Glean | 1.6% | $53.5K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 27 | Freddie Mac | 1.2% | $247.2K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 28 | Deel | 1.1% | $137.1K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 29 | Brex | 0.9% | $222.4K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the listed company completes an Initial Public Offering (IPO) by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET, as confirmed by official company announcements or credible news sources. The IPO refers to the first sale of stock by the listed company to the public on any recognized stock exchange.
If the listed company merges with another entity, is acquired, or ceases to exist before the market resolves, the market will also resolve to "No".
This market will resolve early if the listed company completes an IPO by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.
The resolution source for this market is a consensus of credible reporting.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Anthropic currently trades at 98%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 86.1%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -11.9%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Discord as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 2.5% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 38.7% — yielding an impressive +36.2% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Ledger (EV Gap: +10.8%) and Databricks (EV Gap: +10%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic | 98.0% | 86.1% | -11.9% |
| Ledger | 6.0% | 16.8% | +10.8% |
| Celonis | 5.7% | 12.4% | +6.8% |
| Perplexity | 5.3% | 2.9% | -2.5% |
| Remote | 4.6% | 1.0% | -3.6% |
| Applied Intuition | 3.5% | 8.3% | +4.8% |
| Rippling | 3.3% | 1.0% | -2.3% |
| Ripple Labs | 3.1% | 7.5% | +4.4% |
| Revolut | 2.9% | 6.3% | +3.3% |
| Vanta | 2.9% | 5.9% | +3.0% |
| Anysphere (Cursor) | 2.9% | 3.9% | +1.0% |
| Canva | 2.9% | 1.0% | -1.9% |
| Databricks | 2.8% | 12.7% | +10.0% |
| Anduril | 2.6% | 1.0% | -1.6% |
| ByteDance | 2.6% | 4.9% | +2.3% |
| DiscordBest EV | 2.5% | 38.7% | +36.2% |
| Fannie Mae | 2.4% | 10.3% | +7.9% |
| Anduril Industries | 2.3% | 7.4% | +5.2% |
| Stripe | 2.1% | 5.8% | +3.6% |
| OpenAI | 2.1% | 1.0% | -1.1% |
| Mistral AI | 1.9% | 1.0% | -0.9% |
| Waymo | 1.9% | 8.4% | +6.5% |
| Epic Games | 1.7% | 7.5% | +5.8% |
| WHOOP | 1.7% | 8.6% | +6.9% |
| Ramp | 1.7% | 6.3% | +4.6% |
| Glean | 1.6% | 5.2% | +3.6% |
| Freddie Mac | 1.2% | 10.7% | +9.5% |
| Deel | 1.1% | 1.0% | -0.1% |
| Brex | 0.9% | 5.7% | +4.8% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Nov 13, 2026
- 07:01 AMJCjcsberger$68.60
Bought 70 No for Remote IPO before 2027? at 0.98
- 07:01 AMJCjcsberger$43.00
Bought 44.33 No for Rippling IPO before 2027? at 0.97
- 07:01 AMJCjcsberger$326.34
Bought 333 Yes for Anthropic IPO before 2027? at 0.98
- 07:01 AMJCjcsberger$76.06
Bought 77.61 No for Celonis IPO before 2027? at 0.98
- 07:01 AMJCjcsberger$13.60
Bought 13.88 No for Ledger IPO before 2027? at 0.98
- 07:01 AMJCjcsberger$554.25
Bought 565.56 Yes for Anthropic IPO before 2027? at 0.98
- 07:01 AMJCjcsberger$807.99
Bought 824.48 No for Perplexity IPO before 2027? at 0.98
- 05:39 AMKNknoww$1.00
Sold 1.02 No for OpenAI IPO before 2027? at 0.98
- 05:38 AMKNknoww$0.12
Sold 5.88 No for Anthropic IPO before 2027? at 0.02
- 05:27 AMJCjcsberger$346.93
Sold 354.01 No for Anduril IPO before 2027? at 0.98
- 04:44 AMFAFaucetWiki$1.18
Sold 58.8 Yes for OpenAI IPO before 2027? at 0.02
- 12:48 AM0X0x8b6202045195aDFbF19ca0Fed6af361541DC8434-1771906728466$78.16
Sold 80.58 Yes for Anthropic IPO before 2027? at 0.97
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "IPOs before 2027?"?
As of the latest update, Anthropic leads the field as the frontrunner with a 98% win probability, followed by Ledger at 6.1% and Celonis at 5.7%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $7.7M, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Discord as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 2.5% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 38.7% — an Expected Value gap of +36.2%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Anthropic. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 98%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 86.1%, a negative EV Gap of -11.9% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Ledger holds a positive EV Gap of +10.8%, and Databricks shows +10%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
