AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027?
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027?”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Yes is dominating the market with an overwhelming 89.5% chance of winning. No follows in second place at 10.5%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $103.8K, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Yes (89.5%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Yes is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 90¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- No (10.5%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, No maintains a 10.5% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 11¢.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yes | 89.5% | — | 90¢ | 11¢ |
| 2 | No | 10.5% | — | 11¢ | 90¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve to "Yes" if a state-of-the-art (SOTA) AI model achieves a score of 90% or greater on the FrontierMath Exam by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, the market will resolve to "No".
The primary resolution source will be information from EpochAI however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Yes currently trades at 89.5%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 74.9%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -14.6%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies No as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 10.5% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 25.1% — yielding an impressive +14.6% EV Gap.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 89.5% | 74.9% | -14.6% |
| NoBest EV | 10.5% | 25.1% | +14.6% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Jun 30, 2026
- 05:33 AM0X0x514E7d5f6C92548Fbf3966bbb41591690B8f0f64-1779381305821$1.75
Sold 17.49 No for AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027? at 0.1
- 05:25 AM0X0x514E7d5f6C92548Fbf3966bbb41591690B8f0f64-1779381305821$1.01
Bought 8.408332 No for AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027? at 0.12
- 05:05 AM0X0x514E7d5f6C92548Fbf3966bbb41591690B8f0f64-1779381305821$1.00
Bought 9.090908 No for AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027? at 0.11
Jun 29, 2026
- 06:02 PMKIKisher$89.00
Bought 100 Yes for AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027? at 0.89
- 04:06 PM0X0x87E7FCEE78E26DcE7d9604d73a1c24110641d0B5-1770804565016$44.00
Sold 50 Yes for AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027? at 0.88
Jun 27, 2026
- 02:32 PMOKokc35$12.00
Bought 100 No for AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027? at 0.12
Jun 26, 2026
- 11:36 AM0X0x87E7FCEE78E26DcE7d9604d73a1c24110641d0B5-1770804565016$57.84
Sold 64.27 Yes for AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027? at 0.9
- 07:46 AMARarleclec$5.05
Bought 50.5 No for AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027? at 0.1
- 07:15 AM0X0xD2cba0c6464F96d2567eCC81D5F708d9670e7729-1776513816323$298.53
Bought 317.58062 Yes for AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027? at 0.94
Jun 25, 2026
- 10:47 PMOLOlma$1.80
Bought 2 Yes for AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027? at 0.9
- 10:42 PMDUDualDelta$2,164.44
Bought 2431.95 Yes for AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027? at 0.89
Jun 24, 2026
- 10:31 PM0X0xe70b8e0b2C2C0819F9c9E66718FF06F0D29DDE12-1771872894369$52.93
Sold 61.55 Yes for AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027? at 0.86
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "AI model scores ≥ 90% on FrontierMath Benchmark before 2027?"?
As of the latest update, Yes leads the field as the frontrunner with a 89.5% win probability, followed by No at 10.5%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $103.8K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags No as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 10.5% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 25.1% — an Expected Value gap of +14.6%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Yes. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 89.5%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 74.9%, a negative EV Gap of -14.6% that signals the contract is overpriced.