Back to Skill Marketplace

Earnings Analysis

Post-Earnings Delta Calculation

Quantify earnings surprise versus expectations using z-score, basis-point bridge, and post-earnings delta analysis. Use when analyzing earnings reactions, post-print moves, estimate revisions, or surprise decomposition.

Reviewed by AlphioUpdated 26 days ago<1 min setup

Overview

Quantify earnings surprise versus expectations using z-score, basis-point bridge, and post-earnings delta analysis.

Quantify earnings surprise versus expectations using z-score, basis-point bridge, and post-earnings delta analysis.

Skill.md

How this skill works

Quantify earnings surprise versus expectations using z-score, basis-point bridge, and post-earnings delta analysis. Use when analyzing earnings reactions, post-print moves, estimate revisions, or surprise decomposition.

SKILL.mdALPHIO / VERIFIED

Post-Earnings Delta Calculation

Use This Skill When

  • The user wants to explain why a stock moved after an earnings release.
  • The task requires comparing reported results or guidance against consensus, prior guide, or buy-side expectations.
  • The work needs a surprise bridge, revision read-through, or a view on whether the reaction was proportional.
  • The user needs a reusable post-print framework rather than a loose narrative recap.

Required Inputs

  • company and, if available, ticker
  • reporting period or earnings event date
  • reported results: revenue, gross margin, operating income or margin, EPS, free cash flow, and segment results when relevant
  • expectation baseline: sell-side consensus, company guidance midpoint, whisper number, or prior quarter implied trajectory
  • guidance changes: next-quarter and full-year revenue, margin, EPS, or capex guidance
  • market reaction window: after-hours, next day close, 3-day move, or another explicitly defined period
  • supporting commentary: earnings call, shareholder letter, prepared remarks, or management Q&A
  • If some inputs are missing, proceed with the highest-quality available baseline, explicitly label missing fields, reduce the precision of the conclusion, and do not fabricate surprise magnitudes or driver bridges.

Workflow

  1. Define the event scope: company, quarter, benchmark expectation set, and exact reaction window.
  2. Build a compact reported-versus-expected table for the metrics that actually moved the stock.
  3. Quantify each surprise using absolute difference, percent difference, and basis-point or dollar contribution where possible.
  4. Separate the read into:
    • print quality: revenue, margin, EPS, cash conversion
    • guidance delta: next quarter, full year, and implied exit rate
    • mix and quality: segment mix, pricing, volume, customer concentration, one-time items
    • narrative delta: tone, demand commentary, backlog, competitive remarks, capital allocation signals
  5. Compare the reaction with what was already priced in:
    • prior stock performance into the print
    • consensus versus whisper gap
    • whether the beat was low quality or high quality
    • whether the reaction was driven by forward guide more than the reported quarter
  6. If enough historical data exists, add context:
    • historical beat or miss distribution
    • reaction versus prior earnings events
    • simple z-score or percentile framing
  7. Conclude with the main causal drivers of the move, what remains uncertain, and what to monitor into the next print.

Output Requirements

  • Start with a one-paragraph headline read that answers: what happened, versus what baseline, and why the stock moved.
  • Use explicit labels for Fact, Assumption, and Inference whenever the distinction could be ambiguous.
  • Keep units visible in every quantified statement: %, bps, $, x, or std dev.
  • State the comparison baseline for every surprise metric.
  • Identify whether the move was driven mainly by reported results, forward guidance, mix or quality, management commentary, or expectations positioning.
  • If any important metric is unavailable, add a Missing Data note instead of estimating a number.

Output Template

Post-Earnings Delta

Event Scope

  • Company:
  • Reporting period:
  • Reaction window:
  • Baseline used:

Headline Read

[2-4 sentences on the reported quarter, guidance delta, and principal reason for the stock move.]

Surprise Snapshot

  • Revenue:
  • Gross margin:
  • Operating margin or operating income:
  • EPS:
  • FCF / cash flow:
  • Key segment metrics:

Driver Decomposition

  • Reported-quarter delta:
  • Guidance delta:
  • Mix / quality delta:
  • Commentary delta:
  • Expectations / positioning delta:

Reaction Interpretation

  • What was better than expected:
  • What was worse than expected:
  • Why the reaction appears proportional or disproportional:

Evidence Classification

  • Facts:
  • Assumptions:
  • Inferences:

Missing Data

  • [List any unavailable metrics, baselines, or source limitations.]

What To Monitor Next

  • [3-5 concrete indicators for the next quarter.]

Quality Checks

  • Confirm every surprise figure reconciles to a stated baseline.
  • Check that the narrative explains both the print and the guide, not only one of them.
  • Verify that one-time items are identified before calling a beat "high quality."
  • Ensure the stock-move explanation ranks drivers instead of listing them as equal.
  • Re-read the final output and remove any claim that lacks a source or a clearly marked inference tag.

Guardrails

  • Separate reported facts from inferred drivers at all times.
  • Do not mix consensus, company guidance, and whisper expectations without naming the baseline.
  • Do not invent estimates for missing segment metrics, historical z-scores, or buy-side expectations.
  • Do not claim causality from correlation alone; if the driver is plausible but unproven, mark it as an inference.
  • Avoid false precision when the source data only supports a directional conclusion.

Example Prompts

  • Calculate the post-earnings delta for NVDA and decompose the move into revenue, margin, and guidance drivers.
  • Quantify the earnings surprise for this quarter using z-score and explain whether the stock reaction was proportional.
  • Compare the reported results and updated guide against consensus, then explain the next-day move with a ranked driver bridge.

Best used for

When to use it

Quantify earnings surprise versus expectations using z-score, basis-point bridge, and post-earnings delta analysis. Use when analyzing earnings reactions, post-print moves, estimate revisions, or surprise decomposition.

01 · PRE-MEETING

Prepare a decision brief

The user wants to explain why a stock moved after an earnings release. The task requires comparing reported results or guidance against consensus, prior guide, or buy-side expectations. The work needs a surprise bridge, revision read-through, or a view on whether the reaction was proportional. The user needs a reusable post-print framework rather than a loose narrative recap.

02 · TEAM WORKFLOW

Standardize handoffs

Create consistent research outputs across analysts, portfolio managers, and agents.

03 · LIVE UPDATE

Refresh the thesis

Update scenarios after a new catalyst, KPI release, or earnings result.

Community notes

Built to improve with use.

Feedback will appear here as this skill is used and reviewed.

Leave feedback

Discover more

Related skills

View all
Get Started