
Who will announce Presidential run before 2027?
Core Summary
According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Who will announce Presidential run before 2027?”, traders have formed a strong consensus.
Currently, Pete Buttigieg is dominating the market with an overwhelming 28.2% chance of winning. Rahm Emanuel follows in second place at 19%, while Phil Murphy sits in third with 16.5%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $1.2M, reflecting intense industry interest.
Breakdown of Competitive Tiers
To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:
🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader
- Pete Buttigieg (28.2%): Currently commanding the highest probability, Pete Buttigieg is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 28¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $23.0K in volume.
🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers
- Rahm Emanuel (19%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Rahm Emanuel maintains a 19% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 19¢.
- Phil Murphy (16.5%): Sitting in third place with a 16.5% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Phil Murphy, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.
🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~36.4%)
Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:
- Alternative Options: This includes Ron DeSantis (15.9%), Gavin Newsom (14%), and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (12.5%).
- Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Mark Kelly are still attracting notable interest.
Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard
The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:
| Rank | Predicted Outcome | Win Probability | Trading Volume | Buy Yes (Cost) | Buy No (Cost) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pete Buttigieg | 28.1% | $23.0K | 28¢ | 72¢ |
| 2 | Rahm Emanuel | 19.0% | $20.2K | 19¢ | 81¢ |
| 3 | Phil Murphy | 16.4% | $4.6K | 16¢ | 84¢ |
| 4 | Ron DeSantis | 15.9% | $3.4K | 16¢ | 84¢ |
| 5 | Gavin Newsom | 14.0% | $88.8K | 14¢ | 86¢ |
| 6 | Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez | 12.5% | $57.3K | 13¢ | 88¢ |
| 7 | Mark Kelly | 11.1% | $13.3K | 11¢ | 89¢ |
| 8 | Raphael Warnock | 9.5% | $4.0K | 10¢ | 91¢ |
| 9 | Andy Beshear | 8.6% | $26.8K | 9¢ | 91¢ |
| 10 | Gina Raimondo | 8.6% | $4.3K | 9¢ | 91¢ |
| 11 | Glenn Youngkin | 7.4% | $6.8K | 7¢ | 93¢ |
| 12 | Ted Cruz | 7.3% | $16.9K | 7¢ | 93¢ |
| 13 | Kamala Harris | 7.1% | $68.5K | 7¢ | 93¢ |
| 14 | Cory Booker | 7.0% | $17.4K | 7¢ | 93¢ |
| 15 | Don Lemon | 6.7% | $2.8K | 7¢ | 93¢ |
| 16 | Beto O’Rourke | 6.6% | $11.6K | 7¢ | 93¢ |
| 17 | J.B. Pritzker | 6.5% | $3.8K | 7¢ | 94¢ |
| 18 | Rand Paul | 6.5% | $20.4K | 7¢ | 94¢ |
| 19 | J.D. Vance | 5.8% | $39.4K | 6¢ | 94¢ |
| 20 | Brian Kemp | 5.5% | $4.6K | 6¢ | 95¢ |
| 21 | Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | 5.5% | $17.2K | 6¢ | 95¢ |
| 22 | Josh Shapiro | 5.5% | $13.8K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 23 | Nikki Haley | 5.3% | $4.7K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 24 | Josh Hawley | 5.3% | $9.1K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 25 | Vivek Ramaswamy | 5.0% | $9.7K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 26 | Jon Stewart | 4.8% | $4.6K | 5¢ | 95¢ |
| 27 | George Clooney | 4.5% | $5.4K | 5¢ | 96¢ |
| 28 | Donald Trump | 4.4% | $70.8K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 29 | Tucker Carlson | 4.3% | $30.5K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 30 | Jon Ossoff | 4.3% | $27.1K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 31 | Hunter Biden | 4.3% | $58.5K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 32 | Marco Rubio | 4.3% | $12.4K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 33 | Greg Abbott | 4.3% | $4.1K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 34 | Tom Brady | 4.1% | $9.7K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 35 | Andrew Yang | 4.0% | $16.3K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 36 | Donald Trump Jr. | 3.7% | $9.5K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 37 | John Fetterman | 3.6% | $7.2K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 38 | Erika Kirk | 3.6% | $26.8K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 39 | Marjorie Taylor Greene | 3.6% | $22.3K | 4¢ | 96¢ |
| 40 | Gretchen Whitmer | 3.5% | $5.0K | 4¢ | 97¢ |
| 41 | Elon Musk | 3.5% | $9.8K | 4¢ | 97¢ |
| 42 | Zohran Mamdani | 3.4% | $36.3K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 43 | Wes Moore | 3.3% | $6.9K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 44 | Kristi Noem | 3.3% | $20.2K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 45 | Ivanka Trump | 3.1% | $39.5K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 46 | Steve Bannon | 3.0% | $20.5K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 47 | Elise Stefanik | 2.9% | $4.4K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 48 | Candace Owens | 2.9% | $12.2K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 49 | John Thune | 2.9% | $5.0K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 50 | Michelle Obama | 2.7% | $14.7K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 51 | Barack Obama | 2.7% | $11.3K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 52 | Matt Gaetz | 2.6% | $3.3K | 3¢ | 97¢ |
| 53 | Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson | 2.5% | $11.1K | 3¢ | 98¢ |
| 54 | Katie Britt | 2.5% | $26.4K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 55 | Jared Polis | 2.4% | $6.2K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 56 | Bernie Sanders | 2.4% | $4.3K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 57 | LeBron James | 2.3% | $16.1K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 58 | Mike Pence | 2.2% | $15.6K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 59 | Kim Kardashian | 2.1% | $6.6K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 60 | Tulsi Gabbard | 2.1% | $6.5K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 61 | Liz Cheney | 2.1% | $3.0K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 62 | Oprah Winfrey | 1.9% | $17.6K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 63 | MrBeast | 1.8% | $29.6K | 2¢ | 98¢ |
| 64 | Sarah Huckabee Sanders | 1.5% | $8.3K | 2¢ | 99¢ |
| 65 | Roy Cooper | 1.4% | $7.0K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 66 | Tim Walz | 1.4% | $6.8K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 67 | Hillary Clinton | 1.4% | $15.9K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 68 | Mark Cuban | 1.3% | $14.7K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 69 | Chelsea Clinton | 1.1% | $13.5K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 70 | Stephen A. Smith | 0.6% | $19.9K | 1¢ | 99¢ |
| 71 | Byron Donalds | 0.4% | $10.2K | 0¢ | 100¢ |
Result Rules
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the listed individual officially announces that they are running for U.S. President in the 2028 United States presidential election by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.
An announcement by the listed individual will be sufficient to trigger a "Yes" resolution, regardless of whether they actually filed a nomination to run, or whether they actually file a nomination to run in the future.
The primary resolution source for this market will be official statements by the listed individual (ex: via speech, social media, etc.), however a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps
While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.
Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.
Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities
Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:
- The Most Overvalued Outcome Pete Buttigieg currently trades at 28.2%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 13.3%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -14.8%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
- The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies Marjorie Taylor Greene as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 3.6% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 24.3% — yielding an impressive +20.7% EV Gap.
- Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Byron Donalds (EV Gap: +19.8%) and Chelsea Clinton (EV Gap: +19.1%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
| Market | Trade Value | Fair Value | EV Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Buttigieg | 28.1% | 13.3% | -14.8% |
| Rahm Emanuel | 19.0% | 11.2% | -7.8% |
| Phil Murphy | 16.4% | 15.8% | -0.6% |
| Ron DeSantis | 15.9% | 16.5% | +0.6% |
| Gavin Newsom | 14.0% | 18.6% | +4.6% |
| Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez | 12.5% | 11.7% | -0.8% |
| Mark Kelly | 11.1% | 9.7% | -1.4% |
| Raphael Warnock | 9.5% | 8.0% | -1.5% |
| Andy Beshear | 8.6% | 11.0% | +2.4% |
| Gina Raimondo | 8.6% | 7.5% | -1.2% |
| Glenn Youngkin | 7.4% | 8.0% | +0.6% |
| Ted Cruz | 7.3% | 16.7% | +9.4% |
| Kamala Harris | 7.1% | 13.2% | +6.1% |
| Cory Booker | 7.0% | 9.8% | +2.8% |
| Don Lemon | 6.7% | 12.8% | +6.2% |
| Beto O’Rourke | 6.6% | 4.7% | -1.9% |
| J.B. Pritzker | 6.5% | 19.4% | +12.9% |
| Rand Paul | 6.5% | 13.9% | +7.4% |
| J.D. Vance | 5.8% | 7.4% | +1.6% |
| Brian Kemp | 5.5% | 13.5% | +8.0% |
| Robert F. Kennedy Jr. | 5.5% | 9.5% | +4.0% |
| Josh Shapiro | 5.5% | 7.8% | +2.4% |
| Nikki Haley | 5.3% | 7.3% | +2.0% |
| Josh Hawley | 5.3% | 5.1% | -0.2% |
| Vivek Ramaswamy | 5.0% | 7.2% | +2.2% |
| Jon Stewart | 4.8% | 6.6% | +1.9% |
| George Clooney | 4.5% | 12.9% | +8.4% |
| Donald Trump | 4.4% | 8.3% | +3.9% |
| Tucker Carlson | 4.3% | 1.0% | -3.3% |
| Jon Ossoff | 4.3% | 4.6% | +0.4% |
| Hunter Biden | 4.3% | 5.5% | +1.3% |
| Marco Rubio | 4.3% | 7.3% | +3.1% |
| Greg Abbott | 4.3% | 5.8% | +1.6% |
| Tom Brady | 4.1% | 7.3% | +3.2% |
| Andrew Yang | 4.0% | 6.4% | +2.3% |
| Donald Trump Jr. | 3.7% | 3.8% | +0.1% |
| John Fetterman | 3.6% | 5.9% | +2.3% |
| Erika Kirk | 3.6% | 4.8% | +1.2% |
| Marjorie Taylor GreeneBest EV | 3.6% | 24.3% | +20.7% |
| Gretchen Whitmer | 3.5% | 11.5% | +8.0% |
| Elon Musk | 3.5% | 4.9% | +1.3% |
| Zohran Mamdani | 3.4% | 3.4% | +0.0% |
| Wes Moore | 3.3% | 9.9% | +6.6% |
| Kristi Noem | 3.3% | 8.1% | +4.8% |
| Ivanka Trump | 3.1% | 6.3% | +3.2% |
| Steve Bannon | 3.0% | 15.6% | +12.5% |
| Elise Stefanik | 2.9% | 10.6% | +7.6% |
| Candace Owens | 2.9% | 10.8% | +7.8% |
| John Thune | 2.9% | 9.7% | +6.8% |
| Michelle Obama | 2.7% | 5.0% | +2.3% |
| Barack Obama | 2.7% | 3.9% | +1.1% |
| Matt Gaetz | 2.6% | 11.1% | +8.5% |
| Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson | 2.5% | 11.4% | +8.9% |
| Katie Britt | 2.5% | 7.2% | +4.7% |
| Jared Polis | 2.4% | 9.6% | +7.2% |
| Bernie Sanders | 2.4% | 4.0% | +1.6% |
| LeBron James | 2.3% | 2.5% | +0.3% |
| Mike Pence | 2.2% | 3.6% | +1.4% |
| Kim Kardashian | 2.1% | 1.0% | -1.1% |
| Tulsi Gabbard | 2.1% | 3.7% | +1.6% |
| Liz Cheney | 2.1% | 5.7% | +3.7% |
| Oprah Winfrey | 1.9% | 6.2% | +4.2% |
| MrBeast | 1.8% | 7.8% | +6.0% |
| Sarah Huckabee Sanders | 1.5% | 12.6% | +11.1% |
| Roy Cooper | 1.4% | 1.9% | +0.5% |
| Tim Walz | 1.4% | 5.2% | +3.9% |
| Hillary Clinton | 1.4% | 8.8% | +7.5% |
| Mark Cuban | 1.3% | 15.7% | +14.4% |
| Chelsea Clinton | 1.1% | 20.2% | +19.1% |
| Stephen A. Smith | 0.6% | 8.2% | +7.6% |
| Byron Donalds | 0.4% | 20.1% | +19.8% |
Trade Activities
Here is the trade activities for this event.
Oct 22, 2026
- 06:43 PMCZCZ667$1.28
Sold 7.5 Yes for Will Rahm Emanuel announce a Presidential run before 2027? at 0.17
- 06:43 PMHFhfv$6.30
Bought 7.5 No for Will Rahm Emanuel announce a Presidential run before 2027? at 0.84
- 06:10 PMFAfastandfudurious$1.28
Sold 7.5 Yes for Will Rahm Emanuel announce a Presidential run before 2027? at 0.17
- 04:48 PMMAmaritime6307$1.26
Bought 42 Yes for Will Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson announce a Presidential run before 2027? at 0.03
- 04:44 PMMAmaritime6307$1.17
Bought 39 Yes for Will Dwayne 'The Rock' Johnson announce a Presidential run before 2027? at 0.03
- 02:21 PMKIkittycat67$3.20
Bought 80 Yes for Will Donald Trump announce a presidential run before 2027? at 0.04
- 01:29 PMMAmaritime6307$321.60
Bought 335 No for Will Josh Shapiro announce a Presidential run before 2027? at 0.96
- 12:58 PMSDsdfsdfsdfsdf2$0.12
Sold 3 Yes for Will Josh Shapiro announce a Presidential run before 2027? at 0.04
- 12:58 PMPOpootytherewardfarmer$0.96
Sold 24 Yes for Will Josh Shapiro announce a Presidential run before 2027? at 0.04
- 12:19 PM0X0xd501DD1C724088c440F9BE43A88Bf242b98a1814-1774573287605$0.01
Sold 0.06 Yes for Will Gavin Newsom announce a Presidential run before 2027? at 0.13
- 12:19 PMTAtacor$42.51
Sold 50.01 No for Will Gavin Newsom announce a Presidential run before 2027? at 0.85
- 12:19 PM0X0x9297B98bcB410BE9E4DEde790c5DC2B16E49358B-1781277074215$0.06
Sold 0.46 Yes for Will Gavin Newsom announce a Presidential run before 2027? at 0.13
Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the current market consensus on "Who will announce Presidential run before 2027?"?
As of the latest update, Pete Buttigieg leads the field as the frontrunner with a 28.2% win probability, followed by Rahm Emanuel at 19% and Phil Murphy at 16.5%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $1.2M, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.
How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?
The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.
Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?
Our latest run flags Marjorie Taylor Greene as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 3.6% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 24.3% — an Expected Value gap of +20.7%, making it the premium value play in this pool.
Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?
Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Pete Buttigieg. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 28.2%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 13.3%, a negative EV Gap of -14.8% that signals the contract is overpriced.
Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?
Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Byron Donalds holds a positive EV Gap of +19.8%, and Chelsea Clinton shows +19.1%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.
