Which states will use new congressional maps in the midterms?

$311K Vol
Nov 3, 2026
Active
Probability Trend
California 98.2%
Ohio 97.5%
Texas 96.8%
North Carolina 96.4%
Utah 94.5%

Core Summary

According to the latest prediction market data for the query “Which states will use new congressional maps in the midterms?”, traders have formed a strong consensus.

Currently, North Carolina is dominating the market with an overwhelming 96.5% chance of winning. Ohio follows in second place at 94.5%, while Texas sits in third with 93%. The betting volume for this specific market has already reached $311K, reflecting intense industry interest.

Breakdown of Competitive Tiers

To better assess where each potential outcome stands, the market can be segmented into three distinct trading tiers based on implied probability and contract pricing:

🥇 Tier 1: The Dominant Leader

  • North Carolina (96.5%): Currently commanding the highest probability, North Carolina is heavily favored by the order book. Traders looking to back this outcome face a “Buy Yes” contract price of 96¢, signaling a high degree of market conviction. This contract alone has generated $11.6K in volume.

🥈 Tier 2: The Primary Challengers

  • Ohio (94.5%): Positioned as the most viable alternative, Ohio maintains a 94.5% chance of resolving true. Its “Buy Yes” shares currently trade at 95¢.
  • Texas (93%): Sitting in third place with a 93% probability, the market shows measured skepticism toward Texas, treating it as an outside wildcard unless momentum shifts.

🥉 Tier 3: The Long-Tail Options (Combining for ~0%)

Beyond the top three choices, a wide field of macro variables and long-shot outcomes are being tracked. While their individual probabilities hover low, they represent crucial hedges for speculative traders:

  • Alternative Options: This includes California (92.5%), Louisiana (92%), and Utah (89.5%).
  • Speculative Volume: Despite low statistical likelihood, certain long-tail contracts like Missouri are still attracting notable interest.

Comprehensive Order Book & Pricing Dashboard

The table below outlines the full breakdown of contract prices, probabilities, and market depth for all listed outcomes in this prediction pool:

RankPredicted OutcomeWin ProbabilityTrading VolumeBuy Yes (Cost)Buy No (Cost)
1North Carolina96.5%$11.6K96¢
2Ohio94.5%$6.6K95¢
3Texas93.0%$7.2K93¢
4California92.5%$12.2K92¢
5Louisiana92.0%$16.0K92¢
6Utah89.5%$70.4K90¢11¢
7Missouri86.5%$4.0K87¢14¢
8Alabama86.0%$16.1K86¢14¢
9Florida85.0%$2.1K85¢15¢
10Maryland9.8%$13.0K10¢90¢
11South Carolina8.0%$27.1K92¢
12Kansas7.5%$6.3K93¢
13Washington7.0%$6.1K93¢
14New Jersey6.4%$5.0K94¢
15Wisconsin6.0%$18.8K94¢
16Indiana6.0%$31.0K94¢
17Virginia5.5%$7.1K95¢
18Georgia5.1%$7.3K95¢
19Nebraska4.5%$6.9K95¢
20Illinois3.6%$11.1K96¢
21New York2.8%$15.2K97¢
22Minnesota2.2%$9.7K98¢

Result Rules

This market will resolve to “Yes” if the listed US state uses a new congressional district map for the 2026 United States midterm elections. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”.

To qualify, after the 2024 United States congressional elections, the listed state must have adopted a new congressional district map that is:

- Formally adopted and enacted into law by the appropriate legislative or redistricting authority;

- Not enjoined, vacated or otherwise fully struck down prior to the 2026 United States Midterm elections; and

- In effect for use in the 2026 United States midterm elections.

Maps that are temporarily stayed pending appeal but later upheld will qualify if they are in effect for use in the 2026 United States midterm elections.

Maps that are completely redrawn by a court, special master, or legislature before implementation will not qualify, unless the redrawn map is itself a new map used in the 2026 United States midterm elections.

If the 2026 United States midterm elections occur and no new qualifying map is in use, this market will resolve to “No”.

The primary resolution sources for this market will be official information from the listed state and a consensus of credible reporting.

AI Valuation Analysis: Finding Market Mispricings & EV Gaps

While human consensus and speculative volume shape the broader prediction market, our quantitative algorithms offer a data-driven counter-perspective. By analyzing fundamental signals, underlying trends and historical distributions, our AI Valuation model calculates an independent “Fair Value” probability for each outcome.

Comparing this Fair Value against the current Trade Value uncovers major disparities — known as the Expected Value (EV) Gap. Contracts with a positive EV Gap represent statistically underpriced outcomes, whereas a negative EV Gap flags a potential market overreaction.

Top AI Alpha & Mispriced Arbitrage Opportunities

Based on the latest data model run, several key contracts stand out with significant deviations:

  • The Most Overvalued Outcome Texas currently trades at 93%, but our AI places its Fair Value at just 63.4%. This creates a large negative EV Gap of -29.6%, suggesting the crowd may be overhyping this outcome and driving the premium too high.
  • The Best Value Play (Highest EV) Our model identifies South Carolina as the premium value opportunity on the board. While the market only assigns it a 8% trading probability, our AI’s Fair Value assessment sits at 55.1% — yielding an impressive +47.1% EV Gap.
  • Under-the-Radar Dark Horses Other notable discrepancies include Wisconsin (EV Gap: +9.9%) and Minnesota (EV Gap: +4.4%). These long-tail opportunities are heavily discounted by the live order books despite stronger statistical backing from our predictive model.
MarketTrade ValueFair ValueEV Gap
North Carolina96.5%94.1%-2.4%
Ohio94.5%92.1%-2.4%
Texas93.0%63.4%-29.6%
California92.5%88.0%-4.4%
Louisiana92.0%86.7%-5.3%
Utah89.5%68.9%-20.6%
Missouri86.5%85.6%-0.9%
Alabama86.0%80.0%-6.0%
Florida85.0%72.8%-12.2%
Maryland9.8%5.3%-4.4%
South CarolinaBest EV8.0%55.1%+47.1%
Kansas7.5%10.3%+2.8%
Washington7.0%8.8%+1.8%
New Jersey6.4%10.8%+4.4%
Wisconsin6.0%16.0%+9.9%
Indiana6.0%1.0%-5.0%
Virginia5.5%1.0%-4.5%
Georgia5.1%7.9%+2.9%
Nebraska4.5%7.2%+2.6%
Illinois3.6%2.7%-0.9%
New York2.8%7.2%+4.4%
Minnesota2.2%6.6%+4.4%

Trade Activities

Here is the trade activities for this event.

Jun 30, 2026

  • 08:02 AM
    COColala
    $0.30

    Sold 10.01 Yes for Will Illinois use a new congressional map for the 2026 United States midterm elections? at 0.03

  • 06:12 AM
    ROrocky42001
    $17.34

    Sold 289 Yes for Will Wisconsin use a new congressional map for the 2026 United States midterm elections? at 0.06

Jun 29, 2026

  • 04:57 PM
    DRDr.PNL
    $40.33

    Sold 41.58 Yes for Will Texas use a new congressional map for the 2026 United States midterm elections? at 0.97

  • 03:26 PM
    COcorsur4
    $5.44

    Sold 5.61 Yes for Will Texas use a new congressional map for the 2026 United States midterm elections? at 0.97

  • 03:26 PM
    COcorsur4
    $183.71

    Sold 189.39 Yes for Will Texas use a new congressional map for the 2026 United States midterm elections? at 0.97

  • 03:26 PM
    COcorsur4
    $24.25

    Sold 25 Yes for Will Texas use a new congressional map for the 2026 United States midterm elections? at 0.97

  • 03:25 PM
    SISitsToPee
    $23.97

    Bought 799.12 No for Will Texas use a new congressional map for the 2026 United States midterm elections? at 0.03

  • 03:15 PM
    CEcedriss
    $5.02

    Sold 62.79 No for Will Florida use a new congressional map for the 2026 United States midterm elections? at 0.08

  • 03:15 PM
    SISitsToPee
    $34.11

    Sold 379 No for Will Florida use a new congressional map for the 2026 United States midterm elections? at 0.09

  • 02:46 PM
    SCScottsRoad
    $52.79

    Sold 58.65 Yes for Will Florida use a new congressional map for the 2026 United States midterm elections? at 0.9

  • 10:28 AM
    DRDr.PNL
    $32.66

    Sold 33.33 Yes for Will Ohio use a new congressional map for the 2026 United States midterm elections? at 0.98

  • 09:44 AM
    PRpredictdogepepewif
    $1.00

    Sold 50 No for Will California use a new congressional map for the 2026 United States midterm elections? at 0.02

Whales Wallets That Are Betting on This Event

WI1
willsom
Event PnL
+$879.80
Volume
$10,411.62
Positions
NoYesNo+3
NI2
nicoco89
Event PnL
+$401.93
Volume
$5,766.94
Positions
YesNoNo+1
SI3
SitsToPee
Event PnL
+$62.10
Volume
$5,708.47
Positions
YesNoNo+11
BE4
bernardbulletin
Event PnL
+$276.34
Volume
$5,411.75
Positions
YesYesNo+2
AI5
AiBird
Event PnL
-$207.07
Volume
$5,363.88
Positions
YesYesYes+4
FD6
fdg
Event PnL
+$1,880.40
Volume
$4,597.54
Positions
YesNo
UL7
ultralisk
Event PnL
-$144.00
Volume
$2,636.84
Positions
NoYesYes+16
PE8
peepeepooppoop
Event PnL
-$357.29
Volume
$2,623.93
Positions
NoNoNo+5

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the current market consensus on "Which states will use new congressional maps in the midterms?"?

As of the latest update, North Carolina leads the field as the frontrunner with a 96.5% win probability, followed by Ohio at 94.5% and Texas at 93%. Total trading volume for this pool has reached $311K, indicating deep liquidity and high trader engagement.

How does the AI Fair Value differ from the live Market Trade Value?

The live Market Trade Value reflects public sentiment, order-book momentum and speculative capital. Our AI Fair Value is computed independently with quantitative models that strip out hype to focus on underlying data. When the two diverge, it creates an EV Gap, flagging where the market may be mispricing an outcome.

Which outcome represents the highest Expected Value (EV) right now?

Our latest run flags South Carolina as the most significant mispricing. While the market trades it at a 8% implied probability, our AI calculates a Fair Value of 55.1% — an Expected Value gap of +47.1%, making it the premium value play in this pool.

Is the market consensus overreacting to any specific outcome?

Yes — our data suggests a notable overreaction around Texas. The crowd has pushed its live Trade Value up to 93%, yet our Fair Value assessment puts its real likelihood at just 63.4%, a negative EV Gap of -29.6% that signals the contract is overpriced.

Are there any high-value dark horse options hidden in the long-tail data?

Absolutely. Beyond the headline outcomes, our model highlights under-the-radar potential in lower-ranked options. Wisconsin holds a positive EV Gap of +9.9%, and Minnesota shows +4.4%. These contracts are discounted by live order books despite stronger quantitative backing.

Get Started